Problem awareness for skilled humanoid robots

This paper describes research work aimed at designing realistic reasoning techniques for humanoid robots provided with advanced skills. Robots operating in real-world environments are expected to exhibit very complex behaviors, such as manipulating everyday objects, moving in crowded environments or interacting with people, both socially and physically. Such — yet to be achieved — capabilities pose the problem of being able to reason upon hundreds or even thousands different objects, places and possible actions to carry out, each one relevant for achieving robot goals or motivations. This article proposes a functional representation of everyday objects, places and actions described in terms of such abstractions as affordances and capabilities. The main contribution is twofold: (i) affordances and capabilities are represented as neural maps grounded in proper metric spaces; (ii) the reasoning process is decomposed into two phases, namely problem awareness (which is the focus of this work) and action selection. Experiments in simulation show that large-scale reasoning problems can be easily managed in the proposed framework.

[1]  E. Rolls The Brain and Emotion , 2000 .

[2]  Yasuo Kuniyoshi,et al.  Early motor development from partially ordered neural-body dynamics: experiments with a cortico-spinal-musculo-skeletal model , 2006, Biological Cybernetics.

[3]  Yasuo Kuniyoshi,et al.  From Humanoid Embodiment to Theory of Mind , 2003, Embodied Artificial Intelligence.

[4]  Pentti O. A. Haikonen QUALIA AND CONSCIOUS MACHINES , 2009 .

[5]  I. Aleksander THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF MACHINE CONSCIOUSNESS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING , 2009 .

[6]  D. Norman The psychology of everyday things , 1990 .

[7]  Stéphane Grandcolas,et al.  Filtering, Decomposition and Search Space Reduction for Optimal Sequential Planning , 2007, AAAI.

[8]  Thomas Martinetz,et al.  Topology representing networks , 1994, Neural Networks.

[9]  David Gamez,et al.  THE POTENTIAL FOR CONSCIOUSNESS OF ARTIFICIAL SYSTEMS , 2009 .

[10]  A. Damasio Descartes' error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. avon books , 1994 .

[11]  P. Maes How to Do the Right Thing , 1989 .

[12]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  Conceptual spaces - the geometry of thought , 2000 .

[13]  Patrik Haslum,et al.  Deterministic planning in the fifth international planning competition: PDDL3 and experimental evaluation of the planners , 2009, Artif. Intell..

[14]  Stan Franklin,et al.  Resilient architectures to facilitate both functional consciousness and phenomenal consciousness in machines , 2009 .

[15]  D. Chalmers The conscious mind: in search of a fundamental theory , 1996 .

[16]  Stevan Harnad,et al.  First, scale up to the robotic Turing test, then worry about feeling , 2008, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[17]  Salvatore Gaglio,et al.  Understanding dynamic scenes , 2000, Artif. Intell..

[18]  Antonio Chella,et al.  Machine consciousness: A manifesto for robotics , 2009 .

[19]  B. Baars A cognitive theory of consciousness , 1988 .

[20]  Bernard J. Baars,et al.  CONSCIOUSNESS IS COMPUTATIONAL: THE LIDA MODEL OF GLOBAL WORKSPACE THEORY , 2009 .

[21]  D. Chalmers Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings , 2021 .

[22]  Stefan Edelkamp Cost-Optimal Symbolic Planning with State Trajectory and Preference Constraints , 2006, ECAI.

[23]  N. Block On a confusion about a function of consciousness , 1995, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[24]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[25]  Lokendra Shastri,et al.  A Connectionist model of Planning via Back-chaining Search , 2019, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

[26]  Steven C.R. Williams,et al.  Implications of synaesthesia for functionalism - Theory and experiments , 2002 .

[27]  Hector Geffner,et al.  Inference and Decomposition in Planning Using Causal Consistent Chains , 2009, ICAPS.

[28]  Krzysztof Janowicz,et al.  Affordance-Based Similarity Measurement for Entity Types , 2007, COSIT.

[29]  Aaron Sloman,et al.  Why Some Machines May Need Qualia and How They Can Have Them: Including a Demanding New Turing Test for Robot Philosophers , 2007, AAAI Fall Symposium: AI and Consciousness.