Formation of Spatial Presence: By Form or Content?

Spatial presence, among the many aspects of presence, is the sense of physical and concrete space, often dubbed as the sense of “being there.” This paper theorizes on how “spatial” presence is formed by various types of artificial cues in a virtual environment, form or content. We believe that spatial presence is a product of an unconscious effort to correctly register oneself into the virtual environment in a consistent manner. We hypothesize that this process is perceptual, and bottomup in nature, and rooted in the reflexive and adaptive behavior to react and resolve the mismatch in the spatial cues between the physical space where the user is and the virtual space where the user looks at, hears from and interacts with. Hinted from the fact that our brain has two major paths for processing sensory input, the “where” path for determining object locations, and “what” path for identifying objects, we categorize the sensory stimulation cues in the virtual environment accordingly and investigate in their relationships as how they affect the user in adaptively registering oneself into the virtual environment, thus creating spatial presence. Based on the results of series of our experiments and other bodies of research, we postulate that while low level and perceptual spatial cues are sufficient for creating spatial presence, they can be affected and modulated by the spatial (whether form or content) factors. These results provide important insights into constructing a model of spatial presence, its measurement, and guidelines for configuring locationbased virtual reality applications.

[1]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Aftereffects and Sense of Presence in Virtual Environments: Formulation of a Research and Development Agenda , 1998, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[2]  C. Grady,et al.  “What” and “where” in the human auditory system , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Carrie Heeter,et al.  Being There: The Subjective Experience of Presence , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[4]  Seungyong Lee,et al.  The dichotomy of presence elements: the where and what , 2003, IEEE Virtual Reality, 2003. Proceedings..

[5]  Allen Allport,et al.  Visual attention , 1989 .

[6]  Gregory M. P. O'Hare,et al.  Presence Equation: An Investigation into Cognitive Factors Underlying Presence , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[7]  Mel Slater,et al.  A note on presence terminology , 2003 .

[8]  M. Eimer Multisensory Integration: How Visual Experience Shapes Spatial Perception , 2004, Current Biology.

[9]  Laurent Itti,et al.  Modelling Primate Visual Attention , 2003 .

[10]  Lawrence W. Stark,et al.  The Effects of Pictorial Realism, Delay of Visual Feedback, and Observer Interactivity on the Subjective Sense of Presence , 1996, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[11]  Mel Slater Do Avatars Dream of Digital Sheep? Virtual People and the Sense of Presence , 2002, VR.

[12]  Dennis Proffitt,et al.  Quantifying immersion in virtual reality , 1997, SIGGRAPH.

[13]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Sensory modalities are not separate modalities: plasticity and interactions , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[14]  G. Riva,et al.  Being There: Concepts, Effects and Measurements of User Presence in Synthetic Environments , 2003 .

[15]  Eva Lindh Waterworth,et al.  Focus, Locus, and Sensus: The Three Dimensions of Virtual Experience , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[16]  Mel Slater,et al.  Using Presence Questionnaires in Reality , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.