From paper to practice : Asking and responding to a standardized question item in performance appraisal interviews

This paper examines how a standardized question is launched and received in a corpus of performance appraisal interviews, with a focus on how pre-­formulated questions are translated into interaction. Using conversation analysis, we demonstrate that the same question becomes many different actions in practice. Prefaces as well as prosodic and lexical alterations make relevant different responses, and as such, the question can be recruited to initiate diverse interactional projects such as assessments and other socially delicate activities. As a consequence, goals of uniformity and standardization may be subverted. The interactional adaptations further evidence the strength of recipient design as reformulations also result in more fitted and personalized answers. Our study contributes to the understanding of standardization versus interactionalization, and points to the strong interrelationship between question design and the fitting of response options.

[1]  Steven E. Clayman,et al.  Talk in Action , 2010 .

[2]  Birte Asmuß.  Performance Appraisal Interviews , 2008 .

[3]  C. Antaki.  Applied Conversation Analysis , 2011 .

[4]  Maurice Nevile,et al.  Making sequentiality salient: and-prefacing in the talk of airline pilots , 2006 .

[5]  T. Rapley,et al.  The art(fulness) of open-ended interviewing: some considerations on analysing interviews , 2001 .

[6]  Personalised revision of `failed' questions , 2002 .

[7]  J. Potter,et al.  Qualitative interviews in psychology: problems and possibilities , 2005 .

[8]  Kazuko Matsumoto.  And-prefaced questions in institutional discourse , 1999 .

[9]  L. Suchman,et al.  Interactional Troubles in Face-to-Face Survey Interviews , 1990 .

[10]  Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra,et al.  Creating Happy People by Asking Yes-No Questions , 1997 .

[11]  K. Roulston.  Close encounters of the ‘CA’ kind: a review of literature analysing talk in research interviews , 2006 .

[12]  Alexa Hepburn,et al.  Life is out there , 2007 .

[13]  Emanuel A. Schegloff,et al.  Getting serious : Joke → serious 'no' , 2001 .

[14]  A. Peräkylä,et al.  Conversation Analysis and the Professional Stocks of Interactional Knowledge , 2003 .

[15]  Anita M. Pomerantz,et al.  Telling My Side: “Limited Access’ as a “Fishing” Device , 1980 .

[16]  J. Potter.  Review EssayStudying the Standardized Survey as Interaction , 2003 .

[17]  Harvey Sacks,et al.  Lectures on Conversation: Sacks/Lectures on Conversation , 1995 .

[18]  M. Sorjonen.  Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of question design , 1994, Language in Society.

[19]  K. Adams.  Question/answer adjacency pairs in a performance appraisal interview , 1981 .

[20]  D. Maynard,et al.  Standardized Testing as an Interactional Phenomenon. , 1990 .

[21]  Toward a Sociology of Social Scientific Knowledge , 2000 .

[22]  C. Olin-Scheller,et al.  The Performance Appraisal Interview – An Arena for the Reinforcement of Norms for Employeeship , 2011 .

[23]  N. C. Schaeffer,et al.  The Science of Asking Questions , 2003 .

[24]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[25]  Anita M. Pomerantz.  Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes , 1984 .

[26]  Probing behaviour of interviewers in the standardised semi-open research interview , 1996 .

[27]  T. Stivers,et al.  Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction , 2011 .

[28]  M. Gordon,et al.  Conversing About Performance , 2009 .