Virtual Viewing Time: The Relationship between Presence and Sexual Interest in Androphilic and Gynephilic Men

Virtual Reality (VR) has successfully been used in the research of human behavior for more than twenty years. The main advantage of VR is its capability to induce a high sense of presence. This results in emotions and behavior which are very close to those shown in real situations. In the context of sex research, only a few studies have used high-immersive VR so far. The ones that did can be found mostly in the field of forensic psychology. Nevertheless, the relationship between presence and sexual interest still remains unclear. The present study is the first to examine the advantages of high-immersive VR in comparison to a conventional standard desktop system regarding their capability to measure sexual interest. 25 gynephilic and 20 androphilic healthy men underwent three experimental conditions, which differed in their ability to induce a sense of presence. In each condition, participants were asked to rate ten male and ten female virtual human characters regarding their sexual attractiveness. Without their knowledge, the subjects’ viewing time was assessed throughout the rating. Subjects were then asked to rate the sense of presence they had experienced as well as their perceived realism of the characters. Results suggested that stereoscopic viewing can significantly enhance the subjective sexual attractiveness of sexually relevant characters. Furthermore, in all three conditions participants looked significantly longer at sexually relevant virtual characters than at sexually non-relevant ones. The high immersion condition provided the best discriminant validity. From a statistical point of view, however, the sense of presence had no significant influence on the discriminant validity of the viewing time task. The study showed that high-immersive virtual environments enhance realism ratings as well as ratings of sexual attractiveness of three-dimensional human stimuli in comparison to standard desktop systems. Results also show that viewing time seems to be influenced neither by sexual attractiveness nor by realism of stimuli. This indicates how important task specific mechanisms of the viewing time effect are.

[1]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  A Solution to the Effect of Sample Size on Outlier Elimination , 1994 .

[2]  Giuseppe Riva,et al.  Being There: Understanding the Feeling of Presence in a Synthetic Environment and its Potential for Clinical Change , 2012 .

[3]  Jari Takatalo,et al.  Components of human experience in virtual environments , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  Punit Shah.  Toward a Neurobiology of Unrealistic Optimism , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[5]  Rosa María Baños,et al.  Changing Induced Moods Via Virtual Reality , 2006, PERSUASIVE.

[6]  W. Youden,et al.  Index for rating diagnostic tests , 1950, Cancer.

[7]  Stéphane Bouchard,et al.  Erratum to: Using immersive virtual reality and anatomically correct computer-generated characters in the forensic assessment of deviant sexual preferences , 2015, Virtual Reality.

[8]  S. Bouchard,et al.  Sexual presence and intentional dynamics: deviant and non-deviant sexual self-regulation from the first person stance , 2012 .

[9]  E. Israel,et al.  Viewing Time as an Objective Measure of Sexual Interest in Heterosexual Men and Women , 2009, Archives of sexual behavior.

[10]  RegenbrechtHolger,et al.  Real and illusory interactions enhance presence in virtual environments , 2002 .

[11]  Stéphane Bouchard,et al.  Sexual Self-Regulation and Cognitive Absorption as Factors of Sexual Response Toward Virtual Characters , 2014, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[12]  Jürgen L. Müller,et al.  Eye movements in pedophiles: automatic and controlled attentional processes while viewing prepubescent stimuli. , 2013, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[13]  A. Young,et al.  Viewing Time Effects Revisited: Prolonged Response Latencies for Sexually Attractive Targets Under Restricted Task Conditions , 2010, Archives of sexual behavior.

[14]  José Gutiérrez-Maldonado,et al.  The role of presence in the level of anxiety experienced in clinical virtual environments , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  A. Rizzo,et al.  The application of virtual reality technology in rehabilitation. , 2001 .

[16]  Corey J. Bohil,et al.  Virtual reality in neuroscience research and therapy , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[17]  P Fromberger,et al.  [Use of virtual reality in forensic psychiatry. A new paradigm?]. , 2014, Der Nervenarzt.

[18]  Martijn J. Schuemie,et al.  Research on Presence in Virtual Reality: A Survey , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[19]  G. Harris,et al.  Viewing time as a measure of sexual interest among child molesters and normal heterosexual men. , 1996, Behaviour research and therapy.

[20]  Stéphane Bouchard,et al.  Virtual characters designed for forensic assessment and rehabilitation of sex offenders: standardized and made-to-measure , 2010, J. Virtual Real. Broadcast..

[21]  P. Fromberger,et al.  Anwendung virtueller Realitäten in der forensischen Psychiatrie , 2014, Der Nervenarzt.

[22]  S. Bouchard,et al.  Sexual affordances, perceptual-motor invariance extraction and intentional nonlinear dynamics: sexually deviant and non-deviant patterns in male subjects. , 2010, Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences.

[23]  Kwanguk Kim,et al.  Effects of virtual environment platforms on emotional responses , 2014, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[24]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[25]  A. Young,et al.  Vicarious Viewing Time: Prolonged Response Latencies for Sexually Attractive Targets as a Function of Task- or Stimulus-Specific Processing , 2012, Archives of sexual behavior.

[26]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  Presence in virtual environments as a function of visual and auditory cues , 1995, Proceedings Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium '95.

[27]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Effects of Sensory Information and Prior Experience on Direct Subjective Ratings of Presence , 1999, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[28]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  Embodied Presence in Virtual Environments , 1999, Visual Representations and Interpretations.

[29]  Giuseppe Riva,et al.  May I experience more presence in doing the same thing in virtual reality than in reality? An answer from a simulated job interview , 2012, Interact. Comput..

[30]  R. Chao,et al.  DSM‐IV‐TR: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , 2013 .

[31]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[32]  Sriram Subramanian,et al.  Talking about tactile experiences , 2013, CHI.

[33]  Marcus Mehlitz,et al.  Design of a Virtual Reality Laboratory for Interdisciplinary Medical Application , 1998, MedInfo.

[34]  Young Youn Kim,et al.  Characteristic changes in the physiological components of cybersickness. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[35]  Ray Paton,et al.  Visual Representations and Interpretations , 1999, Springer London.

[36]  P. Emmelkamp,et al.  Sense of presence and anxiety during virtual social interactions between a human and virtual humans , 2014, PeerJ.

[37]  S. Rosenzweig.  THE PHOTOSCOPE AS AN OBJECTIVE DEVICE FOR EVALUATING SEXUAL INTEREST* , 1942 .

[38]  Giuseppe Riva,et al.  Virtual Reality in Psychotherapy: Review , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[39]  Maria del Carmen Juan Lizandra,et al.  Comparison of the Levels of Presence and Anxiety in an Acrophobic Environment Viewed via HMD or CAVE , 2009, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[40]  C. Winslow,et al.  Sexual Behavior in the Human Male , 1948 .

[41]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[42]  Stéphane Bouchard,et al.  Measuring Sexual Preferences in Virtual Reality: A Pilot Study , 2002, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[43]  H. S. Zamansky.  A Technique for Assessing Homosexual Tendencies1 , 1956 .

[44]  M. McMurran,et al.  Cognitive Approaches to the Assessment of Sexual Interest in Sexual Offenders , 2009 .

[45]  David V. Glasgow,et al.  An assessment tool for investigating paedophile sexual interest using viewing time: an application of single case methodology , 2003 .

[46]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  From presence to consciousness through virtual reality , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[47]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Effects of Stereoscopic Presentation, Image Motion, and Screen Size on Subjective and Objective Corroborative Measures of Presence , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[48]  W. Jordan.  A New Paradigm , 1991, Restoration & Management Notes.

[49]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Presence: concept, determinants, and measurement , 2000, Electronic Imaging.

[50]  K. Krämer,et al.  [Virtual reality in medicine]. , 1995, Der Radiologe.

[51]  Rosa María Baños,et al.  Immersion and Emotion: Their Impact on the Sense of Presence , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[52]  M. Castelo‐Branco,et al.  Effects of emotional valence and three-dimensionality of visual stimuli on brain activation: an fMRI study. , 2013, NeuroRehabilitation.

[53]  Birgit Kröner-Herwig,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of eye movements in assessing pedophilia. , 2012, The journal of sexual medicine.

[54]  P. Renaud,et al.  Using Eye Tracking to Identify Faking Attempts During Penile Plethysmography Assessment , 2014, Journal of sex research.

[55]  John R. Wilson,et al.  Virtual Reality-Induced Symptoms and Effects (VRISE) , 1999, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[56]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  Real and Illusory Interactions Enhance Presence in Virtual Environments , 2002, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[57]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  Presence as a Function of Update Rate Within Virtual Environments , 1995 .

[58]  D. Bates,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .

[59]  W. Simon.  Commentary on the Status of Sex Research , 1989 .

[60]  M. Press.  Presence : teleoperators and virtual environments. , 2014 .

[61]  Rosa María Baños,et al.  Presence and Emotions in Virtual Environments: The Influence of Stereoscopy , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[62]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  Virtual Reality , 1991 .

[63]  Alfred C. Kinsey,et al.  Sexual Behavior in the Human Male , 1948 .

[64]  Susan Persky,et al.  The Independent and Interactive Effects of Embodied-Agent Appearance and Behavior on Self-Report, Cognitive, and Behavioral Markers of Copresence in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[65]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. , 1993 .

[66]  François Bernier,et al.  Empathy Toward Virtual Humans Depicting a Known or Unknown Person Expressing Pain , 2013, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[67]  Mariano Alcañiz Raya,et al.  Affective Interactions Using Virtual Reality: The Link between Presence and Emotions , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[68]  Mel Slater,et al.  The impact of avatar realism and eye gaze control on perceived quality of communication in a shared immersive virtual environment , 2003, CHI '03.

[69]  Lawrence W. Stark,et al.  The Effects of Pictorial Realism, Delay of Visual Feedback, and Observer Interactivity on the Subjective Sense of Presence , 1996, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[70]  Gene G. Abel,et al.  Visual Reaction Time and Plethysmography as Measures of Sexual Interest in Child Molesters , 1998 .

[71]  Jordan E. Rullo,et al.  Category-Specificity in Sexual Interest in Gay Men and Lesbians , 2010, Archives of sexual behavior.

[72]  N. Frijda.  The laws of emotion. , 1988, The American psychologist.

[73]  Vernon L. Quinsey,et al.  Maximizing the discriminant validity of phallometric assessment data , 1992 .

[74]  Initial Orienting Towards Sexually Relevant Stimuli: Preliminary Evidence from Eye Movement Measures , 2011, Archives of sexual behavior.

[75]  Henrik Singmann,et al.  afex – Analysis of Factorial EXperiments , 2015 .

[76]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  The Experience of Presence: Factor Analytic Insights , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[77]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[78]  D. Barr.  Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[79]  C. Eichenberg,et al.  Virtual Realities in the Treatment of Mental Disorders: A Review of the Current State of Research , 2012 .

[80]  K. Vogeley,et al.  The Use of Virtual Characters to Assess and Train Non-Verbal Communication in High-Functioning Autism , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[81]  Stéphane Bouchard,et al.  Gaze behavior nonlinear dynamics assessed in virtual immersion as a diagnostic index of sexual deviancy: preliminary results , 2009, J. Virtual Real. Broadcast..

[82]  Helmut Hlavacs,et al.  Afraid to Be There? Evaluating the Relation Between Presence, Self-Reported Anxiety, and Heart Rate in a Virtual Public Speaking Task , 2014, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[83]  Thomas W. Schubert.  A New Conception of Spatial Presence: Once Again, with Feeling , 2009 .

[84]  G. Riva,et al.  Assessment of the emotional responses produced by exposure to real food, virtual food and photographs of food in patients affected by eating disorders , 2010, Annals of general psychiatry.

[85]  Russell Lenth,et al.  Least-Squares Means , 2016 .

[86]  Jonathan Steuer,et al.  Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence , 1992 .

[87]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  Presence within Virtual Environments as a Function of Visual Display Parameters , 1996, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[88]  Alexandru Dancu,et al.  The Ultimate Display , 2014 .

[89]  M. Rosa,et al.  Presence and emotions in virtual environments: the influence of stereoscopy. , 2008 .

[90]  R WilsonJohn,et al.  Virtual Reality-Induced Symptoms and Effects (VRISE) , 1999 .