Supershape Recovery From Electrical Impedance Tomography Data

The idea of accounting for a priori shape information is gaining increasing levels of interest and traction in the electrical impedance tomography (EIT) reconstruction. A supershape-based reconstruction approach is proposed for EIT. We begin by assuming that the conductivity profile to be reconstructed in the measured domain is piecewise constant distributed. Using this formulation, the image reconstruction problem is transformed into a shape reconstruction problem. The inclusion boundary (e.g., interface between the inclusion and the background) to be estimated is treated as a supershape and expressed through a single equation—the so-called super formula. We illustrate the performance of the proposed approach using synthetic and experimental water tank data. In addition, robustness studies considering different regularization types ( $L_{1}$ and $L_{2}$ norms), varying noise levels and different initial settings are tested of the proposed approach. Four evaluation matrices relative size coverage ratio (RCR), structural similarity index (SSIM), relative contrast (RCo), and correlation coefficient (CC) are used to quantitatively evaluate the performance of the proposed method. Both the simulation and experimental results show that the supershape-based method leads to reliable and robust reconstructions and improves the ability to simultaneously reconstruct objects with smooth boundaries and/or sharp features. The proposed approach provides an excellent opportunity for the shape reconstruction framework to express a wide variety of shapes, including geometric primitives. Supershapes can simply represent regular polygons and natural shapes with various symmetries while maintaining a parametric representation.

[1]  Frédéric Truchetet,et al.  Boolean operations with implicit and parametric representation of primitives using R-functions , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[2]  Jiansong Deng,et al.  Shape-Driven EIT Reconstruction Using Fourier Representations , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Jari P. Kaipio,et al.  Tikhonov regularization and prior information in electrical impedance tomography , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Julián A. Norato,et al.  Topology optimization with supershapes , 2018, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[5]  Johan Gielis,et al.  Superquadrics with rational and irrational symmetry , 2003, SM '03.

[6]  S. Osher,et al.  Algorithms Based on Hamilton-Jacobi Formulations , 1988 .

[7]  J. Gielis A generic geometric transformation that unifies a wide range of natural and abstract shapes. , 2003, American journal of botany.

[8]  Jiansong Deng,et al.  Shape Reconstruction Using Boolean Operations in Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Dong Liu,et al.  A Parametric Level set Method for Imaging Multiphase Conductivity Using Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging.

[10]  Josselin Garnier,et al.  Generalized polarization tensors for shape description , 2014, Numerische Mathematik.

[11]  L. Vetrugno,et al.  Electrical Impedance Tomography and Prone Position During Ventilation in COVID-19 Pneumonia: Case Reports and a Brief Literature Review , 2020, Seminars in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[12]  Taufiquar Khan,et al.  Comparison of statistical inversion with iteratively regularized Gauss Newton method for image reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography , 2019, Appl. Math. Comput..

[13]  Dong Liu,et al.  Multiphase Conductivity Imaging With Electrical Impedance Tomography and B-Spline Level Set Method , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[14]  Kyung Youn Kim,et al.  Bladder Boundary Estimation by Gravitational Search Algorithm Using Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[15]  E. Somersalo,et al.  Existence and uniqueness for electrode models for electric current computed tomography , 1992 .

[16]  Sergei Turovets,et al.  Skull Modeling Effects in Conductivity Estimates Using Parametric Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Bastian Harrach,et al.  Monotonicity-based regularization for phantom experiment data in Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2016, 1610.05718.

[18]  Marko Vauhkonen,et al.  Suitability of a PXI platform for an electrical impedance tomography system , 2008 .

[19]  Dong Liu,et al.  Shape-Driven Difference Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[21]  Masahiro Takei,et al.  Image Reconstruction Based on Convolutional Neural Network for Electrical Resistance Tomography , 2019, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[22]  Danny Smyl,et al.  Nonstationary Shape Estimation in Electrical Impedance Tomography Using a Parametric Level Set-Based Extended Kalman Filter Approach , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[23]  Daniel Watzenig,et al.  A particle filter approach for tomographic imaging based on different state-space representations , 2006 .

[24]  S. Siltanen,et al.  The D-bar method for electrical impedance tomography—demystified , 2020, Inverse problems.

[25]  Dong Liu,et al.  Nonlinear Difference Imaging Approach to Three-Dimensional Electrical Impedance Tomography in the Presence of Geometric Modeling Errors , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  Didier Vray,et al.  Multigrid-based reconstruction algorithm for quantitative photoacoustic tomography. , 2015, Biomedical optics express.

[27]  Dong Liu,et al.  A Parametric Level Set Method for Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[28]  Dong Liu,et al.  Estimation of conductivity changes in a region of interest with electrical impedance tomography , 2014, 1403.6587.

[29]  Johan Gielis,et al.  The Geometrical Beauty of Plants , 2017, Atlantis Press.

[30]  Jari P. Kaipio,et al.  Compensation of Modelling Errors Due to Unknown Domain Boundary in Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[31]  Dong Liu,et al.  A Parametric Level Set-Based Approach to Difference Imaging in Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[32]  David Isaacson,et al.  NOSER: An algorithm for solving the inverse conductivity problem , 1990, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[33]  K. Maute,et al.  A parametric level-set approach for topology optimization of flow domains , 2010 .

[34]  T. Tallman,et al.  Structural health and condition monitoring via electrical impedance tomography in self-sensing materials: a review , 2020, Smart Materials and Structures.

[35]  Jiansong Deng,et al.  B-Spline Level Set Method for Shape Reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[36]  Jiansong Deng,et al.  B-Spline-Based Sharp Feature Preserving Shape Reconstruction Approach for Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[37]  Ville Kolehmainen,et al.  Experimental evaluation of 3D electrical impedance tomography with total variation prior , 2016 .

[38]  Guanghui Liang,et al.  A Point Constrained Boundary Reconstruction Framework for Ultrasound Guided Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging.

[39]  S. J. Hamilton,et al.  Deep D-Bar: Real-Time Electrical Impedance Tomography Imaging With Deep Neural Networks , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[40]  Bangti Jin,et al.  A reconstruction algorithm for electrical impedance tomography based on sparsity regularization , 2012 .

[41]  Jiangfeng Du,et al.  A Moving Morphable Components Based Shape Reconstruction Framework for Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[42]  Sin Kim,et al.  Estimation of void boundaries in flow field using expectation–maximization algorithm , 2011 .

[43]  William R B Lionheart,et al.  GREIT: a unified approach to 2D linear EIT reconstruction of lung images , 2009, Physiological measurement.

[44]  D. Ratkowsky,et al.  A General Leaf Area Geometric Formula Exists for Plants—Evidence from the Simplified Gielis Equation , 2018, Forests.

[45]  Bastian von Harrach,et al.  Recent Progress on the Factorization Method for Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2013, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[46]  Roberto Guerrieri,et al.  Parametric Detection and Classification of Compact Conductivity Contrasts With Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[47]  Jiabin Jia,et al.  An Image Reconstruction Algorithm for Electrical Impedance Tomography Using Adaptive Group Sparsity Constraint , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.