Scalable protocol for identification of correctable codes

The task of finding a correctable encoding that protects against some physical quantum process is in general hard. Two main obstacles are that an exponential number of experiments are needed to gain complete information about the quantum process, and known algorithmic methods for finding correctable encodings involve operations on exponentially large matrices. However, we show that in some cases it is possible to find such encodings with only partial information about the quantum process. Such useful partial information can be systematically extracted by averaging the channel under the action of a set of unitaries in a process known as "twirling". In this paper we prove that correctable encodings for a twirled channel are also correctable for the original channel. We investigate the particular case of twirling over the set of Pauli operators and qubit permutations, and show that the resulting quantum operation can be characterized experimentally in a scalable manner. We also provide a postprocessing scheme for finding unitarily correctable codes for these twirled channels which does not involve exponentially large matrices.

[1]  R F Werner,et al.  Iterative optimization of quantum error correcting codes. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[2]  Jonathan P. Marangos Journal of Modern Optics celebrates 50 years of the laser , 2010 .

[3]  Daniel A Lidar,et al.  Robust quantum error correction via convex optimization. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[4]  Isaac L. Chuang,et al.  Prescription for experimental determination of the dynamics of a quantum black box , 1997 .

[5]  Hoi Fung Chau,et al.  Unconditionally secure key distribution in higher dimensions by depolarization , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[6]  Raymond Laflamme,et al.  Noiseless Subsystems and the Structure of the Commutant in Quantum Error Correction , 2003, Quantum Inf. Process..

[7]  Man-Duen Choi Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices , 1975 .

[8]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction. , 1996, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[9]  D. Leung,et al.  Choi’s proof as a recipe for quantum process tomography , 2003 .

[10]  Moe Z. Win,et al.  Optimum quantum error recovery using semidefinite programming , 2007 .

[11]  Raymond Laflamme,et al.  Symmetrized Characterization of Noisy Quantum Processes , 2007, Science.

[12]  M. Mohseni,et al.  Direct characterization of quantum dynamics: General theory , 2006, quant-ph/0601034.

[13]  R. Spekkens,et al.  Quantum Error Correcting Subsystems are Unitarily Recoverable Subsystems , 2006, quant-ph/0608045.

[14]  D. Kribs QUANTUM CHANNELS, WAVELETS, DILATIONS AND REPRESENTATIONS OF $\mathcal{O}_{n}$ , 2003, Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society.

[15]  K. Kraus,et al.  States, effects, and operations : fundamental notions of quantum theory : lectures in mathematical physics at the University of Texas at Austin , 1983 .

[16]  Debbie W. Leung,et al.  Quantum data hiding , 2002, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[17]  R. Klesse Approximate quantum error correction, random codes, and quantum channel capacity , 2007, quant-ph/0701102.

[18]  Audra E. Kosh,et al.  Linear Algebra and its Applications , 1992 .

[19]  David Poulin,et al.  Unified and generalized approach to quantum error correction. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[20]  Scott Aaronson,et al.  Improved Simulation of Stabilizer Circuits , 2004, ArXiv.