THE MAYAK WORKER DOSIMETRY SYSTEM (MWDS-2013) FOR INTERNALLY DEPOSITED PLUTONIUM: AN OVERVIEW.

The Mayak Worker Dosimetry System (MWDS-2013) is a system for interpreting measurement data from Mayak workers from both internal and external sources. This paper is concerned with the calculation of annual organ doses for Mayak workers exposed to plutonium aerosols, where the measurement data consists mainly of activity of plutonium in urine samples. The system utilises the latest biokinetic and dosimetric models, and unlike its predecessors, takes explicit account of uncertainties in both the measurement data and model parameters. The aim of this paper is to describe the complete MWDS-2013 system (including model parameter values and their uncertainties) and the methodology used (including all the relevant equations) and the assumptions made. Where necessary, Supplementary papers which justify speci fi c assumptions are cited. The calculation of organ doses from measurements of activity in urine (and occasionally from autopsy samples for Mayak workers) involves four distinct steps. The value air measurements. The lognormal distribution variable median M GSD of six based on one derived Puncher (16) from an analysis of historical personal air sampler data relat-ing to plutonium and uranium concentrations in for- mer workplaces of the UK Atomic Energy Authority. That paper also includes a sensitivity ana- lysis on M to lung dose; it was found a 10-fold change in M gave a 2-fold change in lung dose, indicating that dose estimates are not overly sensitive to the choice of the value of M. This is also likely to be A full description of the re-analysis of the beagle dog data is given in this special edition (27) . The analysis was performed using two different representations of particle transport from deep lungs: one based on a dog model similar to the ICRP Publication 66 model, and one based on the MWDS-2013 model. The results yielded best estimates of 0.2% and 0.8% for f b , respect-ively. For the model based on the ICRP Publication 66 structure, the model could not be explained without the presence of a bound state. For the model based on the MWDS-2013 structure, the model could be made to fi t the data, but only by reducing particle transport rates to an implausible level. Taken together, the results give very strong evidence to support the presence of a bound fraction.

[1]  A. Birchall,et al.  The Mayak Worker Dosimetry System-2013: Treatment of Organ Masses in the Calculation of Organ Doses , 2017, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[2]  J. Marsh,et al.  The Mayak Worker Dosimetry System (MWDS-2013): How to Weight the Absorbed Dose to Different Lung Regions in the Calculation of Lung Dose , 2016, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[3]  M. Puncher,et al.  The Mayak Worker Dosimetry System (MWDS-2013): Internal Dosimetry Results , 2016, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[4]  D. Gregoratto,et al.  The Mayak Worker Dosimetry System (MWDS-2013): Uncertainty in the Measurement of Pu Activity in a 24-Hour Urine Sample of a Typical Mayak PA Worker , 2016, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[5]  M. Puncher,et al.  The Mayak Worker Dosimetry System (MWDS-2013): How to Reduce Hyper-Realisations to Realisations , 2016, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[6]  M. Puncher,et al.  The Mayak Worker Dosimetry System (MWDS-2013): Plutonium Binding in the Lungs—An Analysis of Mayak Workers , 2016, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[7]  Alan Birchall,et al.  THE MAYAK WORKER DOSIMETRY SYSTEM (MWDS-2013): TREATMENT OF UNCERTAINTY IN MODEL PARAMETERS. , 2016, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[8]  M. Puncher,et al.  The Mayak Worker Dosimetry System (MWDS-2013): A Bayesian Analysis to Quantify Pulmonary Binding of Plutonium in Lungs Using Historic Beagle Dog Data , 2016, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[9]  S. Miller,et al.  The MAYAK WORKER DOSIMETRY SYSTEM (MWDS-2013): ESTIMATION OF PLUTONIUM SKELETAL BURDEN FROM LIMITED AUTOPSY BONE SAMPLES FROM MAYAK PA WORKERS , 2016, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[10]  V. Vostrotin,et al.  THE MAYAK WORKER DOSIMETRY SYTEM (MWDS-2013): DETERMINATION OF THE INDIVIDUAL SCENARIO OF INHALED PLUTONIUM INTAKE IN THE MAYAK WORKERS , 2016, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[11]  A. Birchall,et al.  The Mayak Worker Dosimetry System (MWDS-2013): A Comparison of Intakes Based on Urine Versus Autopsy Data From Mayak Workers Using the Leggett Systemic Model for Plutonium , 2016, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[12]  M. Puncher,et al.  THE MAYAK WORKER DOSIMETRY SYSTEM (MWDS 2013): A RE-ANALYSIS OF USTUR CASE 0269 TO DETERMINE WHETHER PLUTONIUM BINDS TO THE LUNGS , 2016, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[13]  M. Puncher,et al.  An intake prior for the Bayesian analysis of plutonium and uranium exposures in an epidemiology study. , 2014, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[14]  M. Puncher,et al.  A method for calculating Bayesian uncertainties on internal doses resulting from complex occupational exposures. , 2012, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[15]  J. Harrison,et al.  Uncertainty analysis of doses from ingestion of plutonium and americium. , 2012, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[16]  M. Puncher,et al.  Uncertainties on Lung Doses from Inhaled Plutonium , 2011, Radiation research.

[17]  D. Gregoratto,et al.  Modelling particle retention in the alveolar–interstitial region of the human lungs , 2010, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[18]  É. Blanchardon,et al.  Absorption of plutonium compounds in the respiratory tract , 2010, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[19]  J. Harrison,et al.  Plutonium worker dosimetry , 2010, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[20]  M. Puncher,et al.  A Monte Carlo method for calculating Bayesian uncertainties in internal dosimetry. , 2008, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[21]  Alexander Crispin,et al.  Grip strength in healthy caucasian adults: reference values. , 2008, The Journal of hand surgery.

[22]  E. H. Carbaugh,et al.  Ustur whole body case 0269: demonstrating effectiveness of i.v. CA-DTPA for Pu. , 2007, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[23]  M. Bailey,et al.  IMBA Professional Plus: a flexible approach to internal dosimetry. , 2006, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[24]  R. Leggett,et al.  Mayak Worker Study: An Improved Biokinetic Model for Reconstructing Doses from Internally Deposited Plutonium , 2005, Radiation research.

[25]  L. K. Fifield,et al.  Anomalously high excretion of Pu in urine following inhalation of plutonium nitrate? , 2003, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[26]  J. Valentin Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection: reference values , 2002, Annals of the ICRP.

[27]  章 遠藤,et al.  Dose coefficients for intakes of radionuclides by workers; Coefficients for radionuclides not listed in ICRP Publication 68 , 1999 .

[28]  M. Svartengren,et al.  Clearance of particles from small ciliated airways. , 1997, Experimental lung research.

[29]  David J. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Introducing Markov chain Monte Carlo , 1995 .

[30]  J. Vennart Limits for intakes of radionuclides by workers: ICRP Publication 30. , 1981, Health physics.

[31]  N. Hamada,et al.  Occupational intakes of radionuclides , 2015 .

[32]  M. Bailey,et al.  A revised model for the deposition and clearance of inhaled particles in human extra-thoracic airways. , 2014, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[33]  M. Svartengren,et al.  Assessment of long-term bronchiolar clearance of particles from measurements of lung retention and theoretical estimates of regional deposition. , 1999, Experimental lung research.

[34]  В. Н. Дощенко,et al.  Влияние пентацина и тетоксацина на ускорение выведения плутония из организма человека , 1995 .

[35]  Icrp Human Respiratory Tract Model for Radiological Protection , 1994 .