Life cycle costing for obtaining concrete credits in green star rating system in Australia

Abstract Cement is one of the widely used materials in construction. Due to the adverse impacts towards the environment from cement manufacturing, green building rating tools always give a significant consideration towards concrete usage in green buildings. Irrespective of its significance in green buildings, there is a clear lack of research on life-cycle cost (LCC) impact of using supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) in cement as required by green building rating tools. Therefore, this research analyses the life cycle costs of concrete using SCMs in obtaining concrete credits according to Green Star rating system in Australia. This research used fly ash, slag and silica fume as SCM for concrete. The SCM replacement percentage in concrete ranges from 10% to 60% as higher than 60% substitution is impractical. This research calculated LCC for each replacement percentage and specific building elements in different strength categories. LCC of concrete decreases with higher SCM replacement percentages. Further, there are only slight differences in LCC when comparing the three SCMs. In LCC, the contribution from the initial material cost is approximately 85%–87%, and in an exceptional situation such as in columns, this lowers to 66%. In larger columns, the cost of demolition is greater than that of the initial cost whereas it contributed to 61%–68% of the LCC.

[1]  Bee Hua Goh,et al.  Designing a whole-life building cost index in Singapore , 2016 .

[2]  Luay N. Dwaikat,et al.  Green buildings cost premium: a review of empirical evidence , 2016 .

[3]  David G. Woodward,et al.  Life cycle costing—Theory, information acquisition and application , 1997 .

[4]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  Reliability-Based Service-Life Assessment of Aging Concrete Structures , 1993 .

[5]  Pierre-Claude Aitcin,et al.  Cements of yesterday and today Concrete of tomorrow , 2000 .

[6]  Hikmat H. Ali,et al.  Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries – Case of Jordan , 2009 .

[7]  Long-yuan Li,et al.  Mechanical properties, drying shrinkage, and creep of concrete containing lithium slag , 2017 .

[8]  Yuting Sun,et al.  The development of life-cycle costing for buildings , 2016 .

[9]  Annie R. Pearce.  Sustainable capital projects: leapfrogging the first cost barrier , 2008 .

[10]  Sandy Bond,et al.  Barriers and drivers to green buildings in Australia and New Zealand , 2011 .

[11]  Moshe Schwartz,et al.  Cost-benefit analysis of green buildings: An Israeli office buildings case study , 2014 .

[12]  B. Hwang,et al.  Green building project management: obstacles and solutions for sustainable development , 2012 .

[13]  E. Bartlett,et al.  Informing the decision makers on the cost and value of green building , 2000 .

[14]  Srinath Perera,et al.  Goal directed life cycle costing as a method to evaluate the economic feasibility of office buildings with conventional and TI‐façades , 2010 .

[15]  J. Bai,et al.  Mechanical and microstructural properties of self-compacting concrete blended with metakaolin, ground granulated blast-furnace slag and fly ash , 2017 .

[16]  Choon Wah Yuen,et al.  Overview of supplementary cementitious materials usage in lightweight aggregate concrete , 2017 .

[17]  C. Meyer.  The greening of the concrete industry , 2009 .

[18]  Pernilla Gluch,et al.  The life cycle costing (LCC) approach: a conceptual discussion of its usefulness for environmental decision-making , 2004 .

[19]  Nazirah Zainul Abidin,et al.  Investigating the awareness and application of sustainable construction concept by Malaysian developers , 2010 .

[20]  Xiaoling Zhang,et al.  Green property development practice in China: Costs and barriers , 2011 .

[21]  Koji Sakai,et al.  Concrete technology for a sustainable development in the 21st century , 1999 .

[22]  E. Gartner.  Industrially interesting approaches to “low-CO2” cements ☆ , 2004 .

[23]  Leroy Gardner,et al.  Life-cycle costing of metallic structures , 2007 .

[24]  Guang Ye,et al.  Development of porosity of cement paste blended with supplementary cementitious materials after carbonation , 2017 .

[25]  Sunkuk Kim,et al.  Cost Comparative Analysis of a New Green Building Code for Residential Project Development , 2014 .

[26]  Jian Wen Zhang.  Cost, Efficiency and Hygiene - Three Reflections on Green Building , 2014 .

[27]  George Wang,et al.  Drivers and barriers of sustainable design and construction: The perception of green building experience , 2013 .

[28]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  Cost premium prediction of certified green buildings: A neural network approach , 2011 .