Abstract The resolution limitations in optical lithography will make the selection of the future lithographic technology the key issue for the future ULSIs. This paper describes several new approaches for overcoming this resolution limit in optical lithography and the potentials for introducing new lithographic technologies such as electron beam and X-ray lithography. The new approaches include the phase shifting technique and modified illumination. The principles and limitations of these new approaches are reviewed. New lithographic technologies are also of keen interest to the semiconductor industry and they may overtake optical lithography. The biggest problem in electron beam lithography is its low throughput. The concept of a cell projection system, which has been proposed to overcome this problem, is discussed. In X-ray lithography, precise mask fabrication is the most important issue for proximity printing. The limitations in 1:1 proximity printing are reviewed and the potentials of a reduction projection system, which is a break-through that eliminates the need to use a 1:1 precise mask, is also discussed.
[1]
H. C. Pfeiffer.
Variable spot shaping for electron‐beam lithography
,
1978
.
[2]
M. Levenson,et al.
Improving resolution in photolithography with a phase-shifting mask
,
1982,
IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.
[3]
Kazuya Kamon,et al.
Photolithography system using annular illumination
,
1991
.
[4]
Akira Imai,et al.
New approach to resolution limit and advanced image formation techniques in optical lithography
,
1991
.
[5]
C. Willson,et al.
Chemical amplification in the design of dry developing resist materials
,
1983
.
[6]
R R Freeman,et al.
Soft-x-ray projection lithography: printing of 0.2-microm features using a 20:1 reduction.
,
1990,
Optics letters.
[7]
Yoshinobu Nakagome,et al.
Electron Beam Direct Writing Technology for 64-Mb DRAM LSIs : Lithography Technology
,
1990
.