Exploring Engineering and Sustainability: Concepts, Practices, Politics, and Consequences

Engineers deliberating over how to incorporate sustainability concerns into their practices should consider three issues. First issue: what is sustainability, anyway? A response can be catalyzed by examining different meanings of this ambiguous term, from which a spectrum of possibilities can be sketched. Second issue: after identifying a range of meanings, it is necessary to consider how each affects engineering practice. Here two difficulties arise. Initially, the perpetual nature of sustainability results in severe, perhaps unreasonable, restrictions on engineering as it is currently practiced. Relaxing these restrictions adds complexity and uncertainty to an engineer's decision-making process. Another difficulty is that static assumptions used to determine the overall landscape of production, consumption, and disposal of materials are contrary to the dynamism present in engineering innovation. Finally, third issue: cognizant of a range of options and of their corresponding difficulties, engineers need to deliberately determine courses of action. One option is to include sustainability, with its ambiguities, in codes of ethics. Another is to add descriptive phrases that express some aspects of sustainability. Importantly, however, engineers can contribute to sustainability in several other ways. Recognizing that sustainability is a political quality expands the range of possible responses and may entail new responsibilities.

[1]  G. Smith ANARCHY, STATE, AND UTOPIA , 1976 .

[2]  K. Soper What Is Nature?: Culture, Politics and the Non-Human , 1995 .

[3]  A. Leopold,et al.  A Sand County Almanac: With Essays on Conservation , 2001 .

[4]  Michael Jacobs,et al.  Sustainable development as a contested concept , 1999 .

[5]  L. Codispoti The limits to growth , 1997, Nature.

[6]  A. Perl,et al.  Code of Ethics , 1963, Science.

[7]  Sharon A. Jones,et al.  Sustaining Engineering Codes of Ethics for the Twenty-First Century , 2013, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[8]  John Stuart Mill,et al.  Principles of Political Economy: With Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy , 2000 .

[9]  Peter Laslett,et al.  Two Treatises of Government , 1948 .

[10]  Lester B. Lave,et al.  Recycling Postconsumer Nylon Carpet , 1998 .

[11]  Michael B. Usher,et al.  Science in action , 1993, Nature.

[12]  R. Ayres,et al.  Strong versus weak sustainability: Economics, natural sciences, and consilience , 2001 .

[13]  U. Svedin,et al.  The Concept of ‘Sustainability’ , 2020, A Handbook for the Sustainable Use of Timber in Construction.

[14]  J. Herkert,et al.  Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: Microethics and macroethics in engineering , 2005, Science and engineering ethics.

[15]  George D. Catalano Engineering in a morally deep world , 2006 .

[16]  Wouter Van Dieren The Concept of Sustainability , 1995 .

[17]  T. Malthus Essay on the Principle of Population , 2001 .

[18]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the PostNormal Age , 2001 .

[19]  A. Leopold,et al.  A Sand county almanac : with other essays on conservation from Round River , 1966 .

[20]  B. Gruzalski Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development , 1999 .

[21]  A. Malhotra,et al.  Alternative Modernity: The Technical Turn in Philosophy and Social Theory , 1995 .

[22]  J. Schnoor,et al.  Sustainability science and engineering: the emergence of a new metadiscipline. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[24]  C. Mitcham The concept of sustainable development: its origins and ambivalence , 1995 .