Economic modeling in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Calculating the cost-effectiveness of interventions is an important step in accurately assessing the health and financial burdens of a disease. Although clinical trials that include cost data can be used to compare the cost-effectiveness of specific interventions, they only deal with outcomes within the time frame of the trial. Health economic models can synthesize epidemiologic, clinical, economic, and quality-of-life data from many different sources and extrapolate results to a point many years in the future. The models generally compare interventions with respect to the costs per life-year gained or per quality-adjusted life-year gained. The use of health economic models to assess the economic burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and the value of interventions is growing, and will continue to do so as the burden of the disease is better appreciated. Several COPD disease-state models have been described; each uses a consistent definition of COPD severity that is based on FEV(1)% predicted, but the models differ in the allowed transitions, disease progression estimates, utility weights, and costs. This article reviews COPD health economic models and discusses the importance of survival benefits and utilities (health state valuations) for COPD in economic models.

[1]  M P Rutten-van Mölken,et al.  The impact of aging and smoking on the future burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a model analysis in the Netherlands. , 2001, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[2]  Philip Jacobs,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease according to disease severity. , 2004, The American journal of medicine.

[3]  Cesar G Victora,et al.  Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in five Latin American cities (the PLATINO study): a prevalence study , 2005, The Lancet.

[4]  C. Victora,et al.  The Platino project: methodology of a multicenter prevalence survey of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in major Latin American cities , 2004, BMC medical research methodology.

[5]  Jan B Oostenbrink,et al.  Probabilistic Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness of bronchodilator therapy in COPD patients in different countries. , 2005, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[6]  W. Bailey,et al.  Effects of Smoking Intervention and the Use of an Inhaled Anticholinergic Bronchodilator on the Rate of Decline of FEV1 , 1994 .

[7]  D. Postma,et al.  Inhaled corticosteroids and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease , 2005, Thorax.

[8]  R. Pauwels,et al.  Combined salmeterol and fluticasone in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial , 2003, The Lancet.

[9]  D. Nowak,et al.  Epidemiology and Health Economics of COPD Across Europe , 2005, Treatments in respiratory medicine.

[10]  Sean D Sullivan,et al.  A computer simulation model of the natural history and economic impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. , 2004, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[11]  E F M Wouters,et al.  A dynamic population model of disease progression in COPD , 2005, European Respiratory Journal.

[12]  J C Jager,et al.  Current and future medical costs of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in The Netherlands. , 1999, Respiratory Medicine.