The Role of Assumptions in Predictions of Habitat Availability and Quality

Abstracting a complex reality into ecological models composed of maps, diagrams, and mathematical equations forces modelers to organize information, distinguish essential from superfluous components, and define relationships among variables. Within this context, an assumption is a premise, stated or unstated, which characterizes model variables and relationships as essential or irrelevant to the model’s ­setting and purpose. For example, assumptions about how species interact with their environment at a specific time and place can be used to justify the thematic, spatial, and temporal extent and grain of the input data, given a model’s intended application. These assumptions also justify the use or rejection of specific model variables, parameters, and mathematical functions describing the relationship between focal species and their environment. Furthermore, models improve over time through incremental steps of testing assumptions as hypotheses to establish empirical knowledge. Hence, the utility of any habitat model is both empowered by and limited by its assumptions. Therefore it is critical that project objectives and ecological theory inform assumptions, rather than allowing these decisions to be driven by data availability and knowledge gaps.

[1]  Richard A. Stillman,et al.  INDIVIDUAL‐BASED MODELS AND THE MANAGEMENT OF SHOREBIRD POPULATIONS , 2008 .

[2]  A. Starfield A pragmatic approach to modeling for wildlife management , 1997 .

[3]  Wayne E. Thogmartin,et al.  A HIERARCHICAL SPATIAL MODEL OF AVIAN ABUNDANCE WITH APPLICATION TO CERULEAN WARBLERS , 2004 .

[4]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Sources, Sinks, and Population Regulation , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[5]  A. Peterson,et al.  INTERPRETATION OF MODELS OF FUNDAMENTAL ECOLOGICAL NICHES AND SPECIES' DISTRIBUTIONAL AREAS , 2005 .

[6]  Dag Ø. Hjermann,et al.  Analyzing habitat selection in animals without well-defined home ranges , 2000 .

[7]  A. Hirzel,et al.  Evaluating the ability of habitat suitability models to predict species presences , 2006 .

[8]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data , 2006 .

[9]  Terry L Sohl,et al.  Using an Ecoregion Framework to Analyze Land-Cover and Land-Use Dynamics , 2004, Environmental management.

[10]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  HABITAT-SPECIFIC MOVEMENT PARAMETERS ESTIMATED USING MARK–RECAPTURE DATA AND A DIFFUSION MODEL , 2004 .

[11]  Geoffrey J. Hay,et al.  The impact of thematic resolution on the patch-mosaic model of natural landscapes , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[12]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Integrating Landscape Ecology into Natural Resource Management: Integrating landscape structure and scale into natural resource management , 2002 .

[13]  T. Dawson,et al.  Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? , 2003 .

[14]  G. Harris,et al.  Seeking Sustainability in an Age of Complexity by Graham Harris , 2007 .

[15]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Modelling occurrence and abundance of species when detection is imperfect , 2005 .

[16]  W. Steffen,et al.  Landscape fluidity – a unifying perspective for understanding and adapting to global change , 2009 .

[17]  J. Elith,et al.  Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time , 2009 .

[18]  Duccio Rocchini,et al.  Are landscapes as crisp as we may think , 2007 .

[19]  Joshua J. Millspaugh,et al.  Validation of Landscape-Scale Decision Support Models That Predict Vegetation and Wildlife Dynamics , 2009 .

[20]  C. Thomas,et al.  The spatial structure of populations , 1999 .

[21]  K. McGarigal,et al.  Issues and Perspectives in Landscape Ecology: The gradient concept of landscape structure , 2005 .

[22]  Christian T. K.-H. Stadtländer,et al.  Individual-based modelling and ecology , 2012 .

[23]  B. V. Horne,et al.  DENSITY AS A MISLEADING INDICATOR OF HABITAT QUALITY , 1983 .

[24]  Laura Uusitalo,et al.  Advantages and challenges of Bayesian networks in environmental modelling , 2007 .

[25]  D. Fox,et al.  Back to the No-Analog Future? , 2007, Science.

[26]  Pierre Dutilleul,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity against Heteroscedasticity: An Ecological Paradigm versus a Statistical Concept , 1993 .

[27]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[28]  Anthony W. King,et al.  Spatial Uncertainty and Ecological Models , 2004, Ecosystems.

[29]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Beyond fragmentation: the continuum model for fauna research and conservation in human‐modified landscapes , 2006 .

[30]  Nick M. Haddad,et al.  CORRIDOR USE BY DIVERSE TAXA , 2003 .

[31]  P. Camus Populations, metapopulations, and the open‐closed dilemma: the conflict between operational and natural population concepts , 2002 .

[32]  Jake F. Weltzin,et al.  The biogeography of prediction error: why does the introduced range of the fire ant over-predict its native range? , 2006 .

[33]  Bernard De Baets,et al.  Fuzzy rule-based models for decision support in ecosystem management. , 2004, The Science of the total environment.

[34]  Pierre Petitgas,et al.  Geostatistics in fisheries survey design and stock assessment: models, variances and applications , 2001 .

[35]  S. Pacala,et al.  POPULATION REGULATION: HISTORICAL CONTEXT AND CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGES OF OPEN VS. CLOSED SYSTEMS , 2002 .

[36]  Bernard De Baets,et al.  Knowledge-based versus data-driven fuzzy habitat suitability models for river management , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[37]  M. Conroy,et al.  Analysis and Management of Animal Populations , 2002 .

[38]  M. Araújo,et al.  Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling , 2006 .

[39]  Simon Ferrier,et al.  Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression , 2000 .

[40]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[41]  Koenig,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation of ecological phenomena. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[42]  Alisa L. Gallant,et al.  What You Should Know About Land-Cover Data , 2009 .

[43]  S. Amstrup,et al.  Forecasting the range-wide status of polar bears at selected times in the 21st century , 2007 .

[44]  M. Crawley,et al.  Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis , 2002 .

[45]  R. O'Neill,et al.  Assessing ecological risk on a regional scale , 1990 .

[46]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Behavioral tradeoffs when dispersing across a patchy landscape , 2005 .

[47]  T. A. Hanley,et al.  Habitat evaluation: do use/availability data reflect carrying capacity? , 1990 .

[48]  Guthrie S. Zimmerman,et al.  Empirical support for a despotic distribution in a California spotted owl population , 2003 .

[49]  J. Estes,et al.  Strongly Interacting Species: Conservation Policy, Management, and Ethics , 2005 .

[50]  L. Gillson Landscapes in Time and Space , 2009, Landscape Ecology.

[51]  Joshua J. Millspaugh,et al.  Models for planning wildlife conservation in large landscapes , 2009 .

[52]  Sucharita Gopal,et al.  Fuzzy set theory and thematic maps: accuracy assessment and area estimation , 2000, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[53]  S. Jackson,et al.  Novel climates, no‐analog communities, and ecological surprises , 2007 .

[54]  James F. Wittenberger,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Scales in Habitat Selection , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[55]  Mark P. Johnson Is there confusion over what is meant by ‘open population’? , 2005, Hydrobiologia.

[56]  W. Etges,et al.  HABITAT SAMPLING AND HABITAT SELECTION BY FEMALE WILD TURKEYS: ECOLOGICAL CORRELATES AND REPRODUCTIVE CONSEQUENCES , 1996 .

[57]  Timothy H. Keitt,et al.  Landscape connectivity: A conservation application of graph theory , 2000 .

[58]  Jianguo Liu,et al.  Integrating landscape ecology into natural resource management , 2002 .

[59]  J. Rice,et al.  ECOLOGICAL RELEASE AND ECOLOGICAL FLEXIBILITY IN HABITAT USE AND FORAGING OF AN INSULAR AVIFAUNA , 1982 .

[60]  Timothy H. Keitt,et al.  LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: A GRAPH‐THEORETIC PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .

[61]  L. Boitani,et al.  Research Techniques in Animal Ecology: Controversies and Consequences , 2001 .

[62]  M. Austin Species distribution models and ecological theory: A critical assessment and some possible new approaches , 2007 .

[63]  M. Clayton,et al.  Regional land-cover conversion in the U.S. upper Midwest: magnitude of change and limited recovery (1850–1935–1993) , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[64]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  ESTIMATING ABUNDANCE FROM REPEATED PRESENCE–ABSENCE DATA OR POINT COUNTS , 2003 .

[65]  John Harwood,et al.  Risk assessment and decision analysis in conservation , 2000 .

[66]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Sources, Sinks, and Habitat Selection: A Landscape Perspective on Population Dynamics , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[67]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Continua and Umwelt: novel perspectives on viewing landscapes , 2004 .

[68]  Erik Matthysen,et al.  The application of 'least-cost' modelling as a functional landscape model , 2003 .

[69]  C. Graham,et al.  Habitat history improves prediction of biodiversity in rainforest fauna. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[70]  Jacek Malczewski,et al.  GIS‐based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature , 2006, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[71]  B. V. Holle,et al.  Historical land use and environmental determinants of nonnative plant distribution in coastal southern New England. , 2007 .

[72]  Marc Bélisle,et al.  MEASURING LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: THE CHALLENGE OF BEHAVIORAL LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY , 2005 .

[73]  G. Harris,et al.  Seeking Sustainability in an Age of Complexity , 2007 .

[74]  J. Wiens,et al.  Issues and Perspectives in Landscape Ecology , 2005 .

[75]  A. M. Hersperger,et al.  Driving forces of landscape change - current and new directions , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[76]  R. Ricklefs,et al.  Species diversity and ecological release in Caribbean land bird faunas , 1977 .

[77]  N. Stenseth,et al.  Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology , 1993 .

[78]  P. Sullivan,et al.  Using occupancy models of forest breeding birds to prioritize conservation planning , 2009 .

[79]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Key Topics in Landscape Ecology: Frontmatter , 2007 .

[80]  R. Swihart,et al.  Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife-habitat models , 2004 .

[81]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Tradeoffs of different types of species occurrence data for use in systematic conservation planning. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[82]  M. Araújo,et al.  How can a knowledge of the past help to conserve the future? Biodiversity conservation and the relevance of long-term ecological studies , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[83]  John Bell,et al.  A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models , 1997, Environmental Conservation.

[84]  Adam G. Dunn,et al.  In response to the continuum model for fauna research: a hierarchical, patch‐based model of spatial landscape patterns , 2007 .

[85]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  Context-dependent perceptual ranges and their relevance to animal movements in landscapes , 2004 .

[86]  Timothy J. Fox,et al.  A cautionary tale regarding use of the National Land Cover Dataset 1992 , 2004 .

[87]  M. Araújo,et al.  An evaluation of methods for modelling species distributions , 2004 .

[88]  Jack J. Lennon,et al.  Red-shifts and red herrings in geographical ecology , 2000 .

[89]  E. Gustafson,et al.  Perception of scale in forest management planning: Challenges and implications , 1997 .