Control model for the alignment of the quality assessment of scientific documents based on the analysis of content-related context

A control method is proposed for the construction of a quality assessment of scientific and technical documents in natural languages based on the formalization of the perceptions of a document’s content-related context. A method is provided for using the models of documents characterizing their subject and content alongside bibliometric and scientometric data and indicators to identify both the objective and subjective (authors’ and readers’) content-related context of the analyzed document. An outlook is given as to how the context analysis of scientific and technical documents, taking into account quantitative measures of quality (information capacity, significance, and independence of content), as well as traditional bibliometric and scientometric indicators (the document’s citation index and the journal’s impact factor) provides for an objective assessment of the document’s quality1.

[1]  Jordan A. Comins,et al.  Compressing multiple scales of impact detection by Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[2]  E. M. Kreines,et al.  The control model for the selection of reference collections providing the impartial assessment of the quality of scientific and technological publications by using bibliometric and scientometric indicators , 2016 .

[3]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Does quality and content matter for citedness? A comparison with para-textual factors and over time , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[4]  Timothy Baldwin,et al.  Automatic Evaluation of Topic Coherence , 2010, NAACL.

[5]  Thomas H. P. Gould.  Do We Still Need Peer Review?: An Argument for Change , 2012 .

[6]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics: Which method best reflects the judgements of experts? , 2014, J. Informetrics.

[7]  Keshra Sangwal,et al.  On the growth dynamics of citations of articles by some Nobel Prize winners , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[8]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  The interest of the scientific community in expert opinions from journal peer review procedures , 2014, Scientometrics.

[9]  Juan-Manuel Torres-Moreno.  Artex is AnotheR TEXt summarizer , 2012, ArXiv.

[10]  M. G. Kreines.  Methods of computational analysis of semantic models for quality assessment of scientific texts , 2013 .

[11]  M. G. Kreines.  Models and technologies for the extraction of aggregated knowledge to control processes of the retrieval of non-structured information , 2009 .

[12]  Peter Taylor,et al.  Citation Statistics , 2009, ArXiv.

[13]  Douglas N. Arnold,et al.  Nefarious Numbers , 2010, ArXiv.