Collaborative, Decentralized Engineering Design at the Edge of Rationality

One perspective of a design process in the engineering design community is that it is largely a process marked and defined by a series of decisions. The fundamental assumption in most developed design decision support methodologies is that decision makers make rational choices; that is, choices that maximize the payoff for the predicted outcome. Decisions that do not maximize the predicted payoff are termed as mistakes or irrational choices and discarded. However, research in behavioral economics, psychology, and cognitive science has studied the human mind and suggested the notion of "bounded rationality" to explain decision errors. Bounded rationality refers to the intrinsic inability of human beings to accurately choose "rational" options prescribed by decision models such as expected utility. This paper extends the notion of bounded rationality within engineering design. Specifically, this paper studies the design of complex systems that require interaction among several different subsystems contributing to the overall product design. For convergent decentralized design problems, rational designers converge to equilibrium solutions that lie at the intersection of their individual rational reaction sets. These equilibrium solutions are usually not Pareto optimal and due to the dynamics of the designers' interaction in collaborative design, it is rarely possible for them to converge to Pareto optimal solutions. However, when models for bounded rationality are introduced into individual designer behavior, it is seen that the converged solutions can improve the resulting solution. Bounded rational decisions within decentralized design are modeled, and the effects of propagating such decisions within a design process are studied.

[1]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  Robust multiattribute decision making under risk and uncertainty in engineering design , 2005 .

[2]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  GAME-BASED DESIGN: A GAME THEORETIC EXTENSION TO DECISION-BASED DESIGN , 2000 .

[3]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Decentralized Multi-Echelon Supply Chains: Incentives and Information , 1999 .

[4]  Howard Raiffa,et al.  Games And Decisions , 1958 .

[5]  H. Simon,et al.  Models of Bounded Rationality: Empirically Grounded Economic Reason , 1997 .

[6]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[7]  Deborah L Thurston,et al.  A formal method for subjective design evaluation with multiple attributes , 1991 .

[8]  Patrick Little,et al.  Engineering Design: A Project Based Introduction , 1999 .

[9]  Achille Messac,et al.  Physical programming's ability to generate a well-distributed set of Pareto points , 2000 .

[10]  Enrica Carbone,et al.  A Comparison of the Estimates of EU and non-EU Preference Functionals Using Data from Pairwise Choice and Complete Ranking Experiments , 1995 .

[11]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  The other side of multidisciplinary design optimization: Accomodating a multiobjective, uncertain and non-deterministic world , 1998 .

[12]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Robust Design Simulation: A Probabilistic Approach to Multidisciplinary Design , 1999 .

[13]  Wei Chen,et al.  Quality utility : a Compromise Programming approach to robust design , 1999 .

[14]  Shapour Azarm,et al.  Interactive Product Design Selection With an Implicit Value Function , 2005 .

[15]  Michael J. Scott.  Quantifying uncertainty in multicriteria concept selection methods , 2007 .

[16]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  The design of aircraft using the decision support problem technique , 1988 .

[17]  Charles Gide,et al.  Cours d'économie politique , 1911 .

[18]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  Equilibrium stability in decentralized design systems , 2005, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[19]  Vincent Chanron.  On decentralized design: Rationale, dynamics, and effects on decision-making , 2005 .

[20]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  A NEW FUZZY ANALYSIS METHOD FOR POSSIBILITY-BASED DESIGN OPTIMIZATION , 2004 .

[21]  C. Paredis,et al.  The Value of Using Imprecise Probabilities in Engineering Design , 2006 .

[22]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  Collaborative, sequential, and isolated decisions in design , 1997 .

[23]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  DECISION-BASED DESIGN - A CONTEMPORARY PARADIGM FOR SHIP DESIGN , 1990 .

[24]  Kaushik Basu,et al.  The traveler's dilemma. , 2007, Scientific American.

[25]  C. Dym,et al.  Rank ordering engineering designs: pairwise comparison charts and Borda counts , 2002 .

[26]  J. Hey,et al.  INVESTIGATING GENERALIZATIONS OF EXPECTED UTILITY THEORY USING EXPERIMENTAL DATA , 1994, Experiments in Economics.

[27]  George A. Hazelrigg,et al.  A Framework for Decision-Based Engineering Design , 1998 .

[28]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  A STUDY OF OPTIMAL DESIGN UNDER CONFLICT USING MODELS OF MULTI-PLAYER GAMES , 1997 .

[29]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  A study of convergence in decentralized design processes , 2005 .

[30]  Deborah L Thurston,et al.  Optimization of design utility , 1991 .

[31]  P. K. Kannan,et al.  A decision support system for product design selection: A generalized purchase modeling approach , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[32]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[33]  T. L. Vincent,et al.  Game Theory as a Design Tool , 1983 .

[34]  John D. Hey.  Do Rational People Make Mistakes , 1998 .

[35]  Deborah L Thurston,et al.  Real and Misconceived Limitations to Decision Based Design With Utility Analysis , 2001 .

[36]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  A study of convergence and mapping in multiobjective optimization problems , 2005 .

[37]  Scott Ferguson,et al.  A study of convergence and mapping in preliminary vehicle design , 2005 .

[38]  Wei Chen,et al.  An Approach to Decision-Based Design With Discrete Choice Analysis for Demand Modeling , 2003 .

[39]  D. Ariely.  Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions , 2008 .

[40]  Ashwin P. Gurnani,et al.  A constraint-based approach to feasibility assessment in preliminary design , 2006, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[41]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  AN APPROACH TO IMPROVED DECENTRALIZED DESIGN: THE MODIFIED APPROXIMATION- BASED DECENTRALIZED DESIGN (MADD) FRAMEWORK , 2007, DAC 2007.

[42]  Wei Chen,et al.  Decision Making in Engineering Design , 2006 .