Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Nepal

Written history of great earthquakes in excess of magnitude M8 and recently identified 92 small faults around underlying big three fault systems parallel to the Himalayas show a high seismicity in Nepal. However, since faults are so closed that it is difficult to judge which earthquake belongs to which fault and even some of the faults do not hold earthquakes, the usual method of assigning the earthquakes to the nearest fault developing magnitude-frequency relationship is not applicable. Thus, an attempt has been made here to address the problem considering area sources with different densities at each location based upon historical earthquakes and faults which is real evidence of the seismicity of the region. Separate earthquake densities are calculated based upon historical earthquakes and maximum magnitudes of faults using the kernel estimation method which accounts the significance of both the number of earthquakes and size. Since there is no specific attenuation laws developed for the Himalayan region, five attenuation laws developed for seduction zone are selected and used, giving equal weight to all to minimize the uncertainties. Then, the probabilistic spectra for various return periods are calculated, compared with previous estimates and various aspects discussed.

[1]  H. Kanamori,et al.  A moment magnitude scale , 1979 .

[2]  K. Kawashima,et al.  Attenuation of peak ground motions and absolute acceleration response spectra , 1984 .

[3]  C. B. Crouse Ground-Motion Attenuation Equations for Earthquakes on the Cascadia Subduction Zone , 1991 .

[4]  Y. Fukushima,et al.  Reply to T. Masuda and M. Ohtake's “Comment on ‘A new attenuation relation for peak horizontal acceleration of strong earthquake ground motion in Japan’” , 1990, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[5]  D. Wells,et al.  New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[6]  Fumio Yamazaki,et al.  Attenuation of earthquake ground motion in Japan including deep focus events , 1995, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[7]  S. Kramer Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering , 1996 .

[8]  G. Woo Kernel estimation methods for seismic hazard area source modeling , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[9]  W. Silva,et al.  Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Relationships for Subduction Zone Earthquakes , 1997 .

[10]  Yue-Gau Chen,et al.  Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Based on Area Source Model and Seismicity Data , 1998 .

[11]  Ivan G. Wong,et al.  Ground-Motion Attenuation Relationships for Cascadia Subduction Zone Megathrust Earthquakes Based on a Stochastic Finite-Fault Model , 2002 .

[12]  D. Jackson,et al.  A note on early earthquakes in northern India and southern Tibet , 2003 .

[13]  Jean-Philippe Avouac,et al.  Mountain Building, Erosion, and the Seismic Cycle in the Nepal Himalaya , 2003 .

[14]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Empirical Ground-Motion Relations for Subduction-Zone Earthquakes and Their Application to Cascadia and Other Regions , 2003 .

[15]  R. Mcguire Seismic Hazard and Risk Analysis , 2004 .

[16]  John Douglas,et al.  Magnitude calibration of north Indian earthquakes , 2004 .

[17]  S. Sapkota,et al.  Evidence for a Great Medieval Earthquake (~1100 A.D.) in the Central Himalayas, Nepal , 2005, Science.

[18]  R. Bilham,et al.  Apparent Himalayan slip deficit from the summation of seismic moments for Himalayan earthquakes, 1500-2000 , 2005 .

[19]  Hiroyuki Fujiwara,et al.  A New Attenuation Relation for Strong Ground Motion in Japan Based on Recorded Data , 2006 .

[20]  H. Thio,et al.  Attenuation Relations of Strong Ground Motion in Japan Using Site Classification Based on Predominant Period , 2006 .

[21]  Yusuke Ono,et al.  DESIGN EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS FROM PROBABILISTIC RESPONSE SPECTRA: CASE STUDY OF NEPAL , 2008 .