Big Windows and Little Windows: Implementation in the ‘Congested State’

This paper argues for the need to re-assess models of policy implementation in the ‘congested state’. This re-appraisal focuses on two main directions. The first involves locating implementation in the context of wider models of the policy process. We fuse three models, those of Kingdon, Wolman, and Challis et al., to form a new ‘policy streams’ approach. The second examines implementation in multi-level governance. In the UK and elsewhere, much of the focus of traditional implementation studies has been on the link between one central government department and a local agency. However, this vertical (central-local) dimension fails to give sufficient stress to the other horizontal dimensions of ‘central-central’ and ‘local-local’. Paraphrasing Kingdon's terms, implementation models also need to incorporate the ‘little windows’ at local level as well as the ‘big’ windows at national level. Using evidence relating to the implementation of UK policy towards health inequalities, this paper argues successful implementation is more likely when the three policy streams are linked across the three dimensions. The model is thought to be applicable to other areas of the public sectors and complex issues facing all governments.

[1]  C. Skelcher Changing images of the State: overloaded, hollowed-out, congested , 2000 .

[2]  Paul Williams,et al.  The Competent Boundary Spanner , 2002 .

[3]  Mark Exworthy,et al.  'How great expectations in Westminster may be dashed locally' : the local implementation of national policy on health inequalities , 2002 .

[4]  Andrew Grantham,et al.  How Networks Explain Unintended Policy Implementation Outcomes: The Case of UK Rail Privatization , 2001 .

[5]  David Richards,et al.  Departmentalism and joined-up government , 2001 .

[6]  T. Ling Delivering joined–up government in the UK: dimensions, issues and problems , 2002 .

[7]  J. Kendall The mainstreaming of the third sector into public policy in England in the late 1990s: whys and wherefores , 2000 .

[8]  A. Killoran,et al.  Tackling health inequalities through partnership working: Learning from a realistic evaluation , 2000 .

[9]  R. Mannion,et al.  Assessing the performance of NHS hospital trusts: the role of 'hard' and 'soft' information. , 1999, Health policy.

[10]  P. Cairney New Public Management and the Thatcher Healthcare Legacy: Enough of the Theory, What about the Implementation? , 2002 .

[11]  M. Powell,et al.  Joined-Up Solutions to Address Health Inequalities: Analysing Policy, Process and Resource Streams , 2001 .

[12]  R. Mannion,et al.  Enhancing performance in health care: a theoretical perspective on agency and the role of information. , 2000, Health economics.

[13]  Michael Hill Implementation Theory: yesterday's issue? , 1997 .

[14]  G. Wistow,et al.  Inter-agency services in England and The Netherlands. A comparative study of integrated care development and delivery. , 1999, Health policy.

[15]  Paul A. Sabatier,et al.  Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Implementation Research: a Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis , 1986, Journal of Public Policy.

[16]  C. Allen 'They just don't live and breathe the policy like we do…': Policy Intentions and Practice Dilemmas in Modern Social Policy and Implementation Networks , 2001 .

[17]  Geert Teisman,et al.  Models For Research into Decision-MakingProcesses: On Phases, Streams and Decision-Making Rounds , 2000 .

[18]  Glyn Davis,et al.  Rediscovering Implementation: Public Sector Contracting and Human Services , 2001 .

[19]  M. Powell,et al.  Equal Access to Health Care and the British National Health Service , 2003 .

[20]  H. Wolman,et al.  The Determinants of Program Success and Failure , 1981, Journal of Public Policy.

[21]  B. Guy Peters,et al.  Managing Horizontal Government: The Politics of Co-Ordination , 1998 .

[22]  M. Flinders,et al.  Governance in Whitehall , 2002 .

[23]  Mark Evans,et al.  Understanding Policy Transfer: A Multi-Level, Multi-Disciplinary Perspective , 1999 .

[24]  M. Blackmore Mind the Gap: Exploring the Implementation Deficit in the Administration of the Stricter Benefits Regime , 2001 .

[25]  M. Powell,et al.  Markets, Bureaucracy and Public Management: The NHS: Quasi-market, Quasi-hierarchy and Quasi-network? , 1999 .

[26]  Brian Hardy,et al.  In Pursuit of Inter-Agency Collaboration In The Public Sector , 1999 .

[27]  William Plowden,et al.  Joint Approaches to Social Policy: Contents , 1988 .