Social Media Messages in an Emerging Health Crisis: Tweeting Bird Flu

Limited research has examined the messages produced about health-related crises on social media platforms and whether these messages contain content that would allow individuals to make sense of a crisis and respond effectively. This study uses the crisis and emergency risk communication (CERC) framework to evaluate the content of messages sent via Twitter during an emerging crisis. Using manual and computer-driven content analysis methods, the study analyzed 25,598 tweets about the H7N9 virus that were produced in April 2013. The study found that a large proportion of messages contained sensemaking information. However, few tweets contained efficacy information that would help individuals respond to the crisis appropriately. Implications and recommendations for practice and future study are discussed.

[1]  Megumi Kano,et al.  Communicating Actionable Risk for Terrorism and Other Hazards⋆ , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  Sandra Crouse Quinn,et al.  Effective Communication During an Influenza Pandemic: The Value of Using a Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication Framework , 2008, Health promotion practice.

[3]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data , 2007 .

[4]  W. T. Coombs,et al.  Conceptualizing Crisis Communication , 2008, Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication.

[5]  Matthew W. Seeger,et al.  CERC as a Theoretical Framework for Research and Practice , 2008, Health promotion practice.

[6]  K. Witte.  Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model , 1992 .

[7]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking , 2005 .

[8]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Want to be Retweeted? Large Scale Analytics on Factors Impacting Retweet in Twitter Network , 2010, 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing.

[9]  Brenda L. Elledge,et al.  Implications of Public Understanding of Avian Influenza for Fostering Effective Risk Communication , 2008, Health promotion practice.

[10]  Barbara J Reynolds,et al.  Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication as an Integrative Model , 2005, Journal of health communication.

[11]  Timothy L. Sellnow,et al.  Terse Messaging and Public Health in the Midst of Natural Disasters: The Case of the Boulder Floods , 2015, Health communication.

[12]  Carter T. Butts,et al.  Warning tweets: serial transmission of messages during the warning phase of a disaster event , 2014 .

[13]  R. Schieber,et al.  Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication , 2005 .

[14]  K. Weick.  ENACTED SENSEMAKING IN CRISIS SITUATIONS[1] , 1988 .

[15]  R. Ulmer,et al.  Effective Crisis Communication: Moving From Crisis to Opportunity , 2006 .

[16]  K. Krippendorff.  Reliability in Content Analysis: Some Common Misconceptions and Recommendations , 2004 .

[17]  Brooke Fisher Liu,et al.  Social media use during disasters: a review of the knowledge base and gaps. , 2012 .

[18]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[19]  G. Eysenbach,et al.  Pandemics in the Age of Twitter: Content Analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 Outbreak , 2010, PloS one.

[20]  Alberto Maria Segre,et al.  The Use of Twitter to Track Levels of Disease Activity and Public Concern in the U.S. during the Influenza A H1N1 Pandemic , 2011, PloS one.

[21]  N. Parrott.  Self-Efficacy and Rural Women's Performance of Breast and Cervical Cancer Detection Practices , 2001, Journal of health communication.