Personality traits and echo chambers on facebook

In online social networks, users tend to select information that adhere to their system of beliefs and to form polarized groups of like minded people. Polarization as well as its effects on online social interactions have been extensively investigated. Still, the relation between group formation and personality traits remains unclear. A better understanding of the cognitive and psychological determinants of online social dynamics might help to design more efficient communication strategies and to challenge the digital misinformation threat. In this work, we focus on users commenting posts published by US Facebook pages supporting scientific and conspiracy-like narratives, and we classify the personality traits of those users according to their online behavior. We show that different and conflicting communities are populated by users showing similar psychological profiles, and that the dominant personality model is the same in both scientific and conspiracy echo chambers. Moreover, we observe that the permanence within echo chambers slightly shapes users' psychological profiles. Our results suggest that the presence of specific personality traits in individuals lead to their considerable involvement in supporting narratives inside virtual echo chambers.

[1]  Harry Eugene Stanley,et al.  Modeling confirmation bias and polarization , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[2]  B. O'Connor,et al.  A quantitative review of the comprehensiveness of the five-factor model in relation to popular personality inventories. , 2002, Assessment.

[3]  Marie-Francine Moens,et al.  Computational personality recognition in social media , 2016, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[4]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Emotional Dynamics in the Age of Misinformation , 2015, PloS one.

[5]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[6]  Alessandro Flammini,et al.  Predicting online extremism, content adopters, and interaction reciprocity , 2016, SocInfo.

[7]  Pushmeet Kohli,et al.  Manifestations of user personality in website choice and behaviour on online social networks , 2013, Machine Learning.

[8]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Science vs Conspiracy: Collective Narratives in the Age of Misinformation , 2014, PloS one.

[9]  Fabio Celli.  Unsupervised Personality Recognition for Social Network Sites , 2012, ICDS 2012.

[10]  W. T. Norman,et al.  Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: replicated factors structure in peer nomination personality ratings. , 1963, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[11]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  Our Twitter Profiles, Our Selves: Predicting Personality with Twitter , 2011, 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing.

[12]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  Fragmented social media: a look into selective exposure to political news , 2013, WWW.

[13]  Nigel Holt,et al.  Comprar Psychology. The Science Of Mind And Behaviour | Nigel Holt | 9780077136406 | MCGRAW HILL , 2012 .

[14]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook , 2015, Science.

[15]  Antonio Scala,et al.  The economy of attention in the age of (mis)information , 2014, Journal of Trust Management.

[16]  Jon Oberlander,et al.  Whose Thumb Is It Anyway? Classifying Author Personality from Weblog Text , 2006, ACL.

[17]  Michela Del Vicario,et al.  Viral Misinformation: The Role of Homophily and Polarization , 2014, WWW.

[18]  Tom Buchanan,et al.  The true self online: Personality correlates of preference for self-expression online, and observer ratings of personality online and offline , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  M. Kosinski,et al.  Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  John A. Johnson,et al.  Handbook of personality psychology. , 1997 .

[21]  Yair Amichai-Hamburger,et al.  Social network use and personality , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  T. Graepel,et al.  Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  B. O'Connor,et al.  A Quantitative Review of the Comprehensiveness of the Five-Factor Model in Relation to Popular Personality Inventories , 2002 .

[24]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Debunking in a world of tribes , 2015, PloS one.

[25]  Martin E. P. Seligman,et al.  The Online Social Self , 2014, Assessment.

[26]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Social Determinants of Content Selection in the Age of (Mis)Information , 2014, SocInfo.

[27]  J. Dewey,et al.  The Public and Its Problems: An Essay in Political Inquiry , 2016 .

[28]  C. Sunstein.  The Law of Group Polarization , 1999, How Change Happens.

[29]  Fabrizio Silvestri,et al.  On the Behaviour of Deviant Communities in Online Social Networks , 2016, ICWSM.

[30]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Trend of Narratives in the Age of Misinformation , 2015, PloS one.

[31]  V. Benet‐Martínez,et al.  Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[32]  Jacob Ratkiewicz,et al.  Political Polarization on Twitter , 2011, ICWSM.

[33]  G. Caldarelli,et al.  The spreading of misinformation online , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Rosanna E. Guadagno,et al.  Make new friends or keep the old: Gender and personality differences in social networking use , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[35]  Minas Michikyan,et al.  Can you tell who I am? Neuroticism, extraversion, and online self-presentation among young adults , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[36]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog , 2005, LinkKDD '05.

[37]  Marilyn A. Walker,et al.  Using Linguistic Cues for the Automatic Recognition of Personality in Conversation and Text , 2007, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[38]  S. Srivastava,et al.  The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. , 1999 .

[39]  Alejandro Bellogín,et al.  Relating Personality Types with User Preferences in Multiple Entertainment Domains , 2013, UMAP Workshops.

[40]  Marti Olsen Laney.  The Introvert Advantage: How to Thrive in an Extrovert World , 2002 .

[41]  Fabio Celli,et al.  Automatic Personality and Interaction Style Recognition from Facebook Profile Pictures , 2014, ACM Multimedia.

[42]  Narnia C. Worth,et al.  Personality and behavior in a massively multiplayer online role-playing game , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[43]  B. Sweetman.  Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy , 1997 .

[44]  Gregory J. Park,et al.  Automatic personality assessment through social media language. , 2015, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Users Polarization on Facebook and Youtube , 2016, PloS one.

[46]  P. Costa,et al.  Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  Jennifer Golbeck,et al.  Predicting personality with social media , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[48]  Stephen Marsh,et al.  Editorial: Journal of Trust Management , 2014, Journal of Trust Management.

[49]  N. Holt,et al.  Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behaviour , 1993 .

[50]  Qian Zhang,et al.  Collective attention in the age of (mis)information , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..