Learning physics through play in an augmented reality environment

The Learning Physics through Play Project (LPP) engaged 6–8 year old students (n = 43) in a series of scientific investigations of Newtonian force and motion including a series of augmented reality activities. We outline the two design principles behind the LPP curriculum: 1) the use of socio-dramatic, embodied play in the form of participatory modeling to support inquiry; and 2) progressive symbolization within rich semiotic ecologies to help students construct meaning. We then present pre- and post-test results to show that young students were able to develop a conceptual understanding of force, net force, friction and two-dimensional motion after participating in the LPP curriculum. Finally, we present two case studies that illustrate the design principles in action. Taken together the cases show some of the strengths and challenges associated with using augmented reality, embodied play, and a student invented semiotic ecology for scientific inquiry.

[1]  A. Nicolopoulou,et al.  Play, Cognitive Development, and the Social World: Piaget, Vygotsky, and Beyond , 1993 .

[2]  D. Klahr.  Exploring Science: The Cognition and Development of Discovery Processes , 2000 .

[3]  Magdalene Lampert,et al.  Using Designed Instructional Activities to Enable Novices to Manage Ambitious Mathematics Teaching , 2010 .

[4]  R. Stevens,et al.  Disrupting Representational Infrastructure in Conversations Across Disciplines , 2002 .

[5]  Curt Acredolo,et al.  On the Understanding of the Relationships between Speed, Duration, and Distance. , 1984 .

[6]  I. Sigel,et al.  HANDBOOK OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY , 2006 .

[7]  E. Hutchins.  Understanding practice: Learning to navigate , 1993 .

[8]  Douglas B. Clark,et al.  Comparison of Students' Knowledge Structure Coherence and Understanding of Force in the Philippines, Turkey, China, Mexico, and the United States , 2011 .

[9]  J. Roschelle.  Learning by Collaborating: Convergent Conceptual Change , 1992 .

[10]  W. Friedman.  The Developmental psychology of time , 1982 .

[11]  Gilles Fauconnier,et al.  Conceptual Integration Networks , 1998, Cogn. Sci..

[12]  A. diSessa.  Toward an Epistemology of Physics , 1993 .

[13]  Eric Klopfer,et al.  Augmented Learning: Research and Design of Mobile Educational Games , 2008 .

[14]  Andra A. DiSessa.  Inventing Graphing: Meta­ Representational Expertise in Children , 1991 .

[15]  Jann Pataray-Ching,et al.  Revisiting “Play”: Analyzing and Articulating Acts of Inquiry , 2003 .

[16]  P. V. H. Weems,et al.  Learning to Navigate , 1943 .

[17]  Ricardo Nemirovsky,et al.  Body Motion and Graphing , 1998 .

[18]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms : perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design , 2000 .

[19]  R. Siegler,et al.  Acquisition of formal scientific reasoning by 10- and 13-year-olds: Designing a factorial experiment. , 1975 .

[20]  Ricardo Nemirovsky,et al.  Experiencing Change: The Mathematics of Change in Multiple Environments , 2001 .

[21]  Vanessa Colella,et al.  Participatory Simulations: Building Collaborative Understanding Through Immersive Dynamic Modeling , 2000 .

[22]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Participating in Classroom Mathematical Practices , 2001 .

[23]  J. Roschelle,et al.  Misconceptions Reconceived: A Constructivist Analysis of Knowledge in Transition , 1994 .

[24]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[25]  Gerry Stahl,et al.  Connecting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning to Policy and Practice: CSCL2011 Conference Proceedings , 2011 .

[26]  L. Schauble,et al.  Inventing Data Structures for Representational Purposes: Elementary Grade Students' Classification Models , 2000 .

[27]  J. Bruner,et al.  Play: Its Role in Development and Evolution , 1976 .

[28]  R. Glaser.  Advances in Instructional Psychology , 1978 .

[29]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Knowledge in pieces : An evolving framework for understanding knowing and learning , 1988 .

[30]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .

[31]  L. Schauble,et al.  Symbolic communication in mathematics and science: Co-constituting inscription and thought. , 2002 .

[32]  D. Kuhn.  The development of causal reasoning. , 2012, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[33]  J. Bransford.  How people learn , 2000 .

[34]  K. McGraw,et al.  Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1996 .

[35]  Patricia M. Cooper.  The Classrooms All Young Children Need: Lessons in Teaching from Vivian Paley , 2009 .

[36]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  The Temporal Development of Representational Practices: Implications for Theory and Analysis of Situated Learning , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[37]  Sandra A. Thompson,et al.  Interaction and grammar: Frontmatter , 1996 .

[38]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Changing Minds: Computers, Learning, and Literacy , 2000 .

[39]  J. Lave,et al.  Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context , 1996 .

[40]  L. Schauble,et al.  Reasoning about Structure and Function: Children's Conceptions of Gears , 1998 .

[41]  Michael Cole,et al.  Current activity for the future: The Zo‐ped , 1984 .

[42]  G. Forman,et al.  Constructivism in the computer age , 1988 .

[43]  Kathleen E. Metz.  Reassessment of Developmental Constraints on Children’s Science Instruction , 1995 .

[44]  Amy M. Masnick,et al.  The Development of Causal Reasoning , 2007 .

[45]  B. White.  ThinkerTools: Causal Models, Conceptual Change, and Science Education , 1993 .

[46]  David Hammer,et al.  Dynaturtle Revisited: Learning Physics Through Collaborative Design of a Computer Model , 1993, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[47]  Elinor Ochs,et al.  Interaction and grammar: “When I come down I'm in the domain state”: grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physicists , 1996 .

[48]  L. Schauble,et al.  The development of scientific reasoning in knowledge-rich contexts. , 1996 .

[49]  Kathleen E. Metz.  On the Complex Relation Between Cognitive Developmental Research and Children’s Science Curricula , 1997 .

[50]  J. Piaget.  Play, dreams and imitation in childhood , 1951 .

[51]  Judy S. DeLoache,et al.  Early understanding of the representational function of pictures , 1994, Cognition.

[52]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  TAKING SCIENCE TO SCHOOL: LEARNING AND TEACHING SCIENCE IN GRADES K-8 , 2007 .

[53]  J. Bruner.  Actual minds, possible worlds , 1985 .

[54]  G. Bateson.  A theory of play and fantasy. , 1955 .

[55]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[56]  B. White,et al.  Metamodeling Knowledge: Developing Students' Understanding of Scientific Modeling , 2005 .

[57]  P. Cobb.  Reasoning With Tools and Inscriptions , 2002 .

[58]  C. Goodwin.  Action and embodiment within situated human interaction , 2000 .

[59]  Noel Enyedy.  Inventing Mapping: Creating Cultural Forms to Solve Collective Problems , 2005 .

[60]  F. Matsuda.  Development of concepts of interrelationships among duration, distance, and speed , 2001 .

[61]  L. Schauble,et al.  Scientific Thinking and Science Literacy , 2007 .

[62]  R. Siegler,et al.  ACROSS THE GREAT DIVIDE : BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN UNDERSTANDING OF TODDLERS ' AND OLDER CHILDREN ' S THINKING Zhe , 2002 .