The Symbol Trail Making Test: Test Development and Utility as a Measure of Cognitive Impairment

Although the Trail Making Test (TMT) has proven to be an exceptional clinical tool, its applications have been limited by the instrument's use of the Arabic numeral system and Latin alphabet. Clearly an instrument not limited by a specific alphabet or numerical system could fill this void. This study presents the development and validation of an alternative to the TMT that offers modestly similar psychometric properties and can be used with populations that have no familiarity with the Arabic numerical system or a specific alphabet. The Symbol Trail Making Test (STMT), which employs symbols that are not language or numerically based was administered to a normative sample of 210 participants, including 54 individuals whose first language was not English, for the purpose of collecting normative data. Reliability, assessed through an alternate form administration, and convergent validity, assessed through correlation with the TMT in a nonpatient sample, was deemed acceptable. Significant discriminant validity was obtained comparing non-brain-injured patients to brain-injured patients, particularly on time measures. An analysis of variance found no significant difference between native English speakers and individuals speaking English as a second language on performance on the STMT. This preliminary study provides evidence that the STMT is a clinically useful instrument for discriminating brain-injured from non-brain-injured participants without employing a specific culture-bound symbol system.

[1]  D. Stuss,et al.  Traumatic brain injury: A comparison of three clinical tests, and analysis of recovery , 1989 .

[2]  R. W. Jones,et al.  Behaviors analogous to frontal lobe dysfunction in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder , 1989 .

[3]  R. Reitan The relation of the trail making test to organic brain damage. , 1955, Journal of consulting psychology.

[4]  D. Swiercinsky Factorial Pattern Description and Comparison of Functional Abilities in Neuropsychological Assessment , 1979, Perceptual and motor skills.

[5]  H S Levin,et al.  The Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test: A Practical Scale to Assess Cognition after Head Injury , 1979, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[6]  Relation of Acuteness of Organic Brain Dysfunction to Trail Making Test Performances , 1962, Perceptual and motor skills.

[7]  David Shum,et al.  Construct validity of eight tests of attention : comparison of normal and closed head injured samples , 1990 .

[8]  R. Reitan Trail Making Test: Manual for Administration and Scoring , 1992 .

[9]  G. Goldstein,et al.  Similarities and differences between psychological deficit in aging and brain damage. , 1975, Journal of gerontology.

[10]  B. Brown,et al.  The expanded Trail Making Test: rationale, development, and psychometric properties. , 1998, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[11]  R. R. Alvarez Comparison of Depressive and Brain-Injured Subjects on the Trail Making Test , 1962 .

[12]  G. Shute,et al.  Developmental variability in frontal lobe function , 1990 .

[13]  J. Ricker,et al.  Clinical validation of the Oral Trail Making Test , 1996 .

[14]  M. Lezak Neuropsychological assessment, 3rd ed. , 1995 .