Lateral spike conduction velocity in the visual cortex affects spatial range of synchronization and receptive field size without visual experience: a learning model with spiking neurons

Abstract. Classical receptive fields (cRF) increase in size from the retina to higher visual centers. The present work shows how temporal properties, in particular lateral spike velocity and spike input correlation, can affect cRF size and position without visual experience. We demonstrate how these properties are related to the spatial range of cortical synchronization if Hebbian learning dominates early development. For this, a largely reduced model of two successive levels of the visual cortex is developed (e.g., areas V1 and V2). It consists of retinotopic networks of spiking neurons with constant spike velocity in lateral connections. Feedforward connections between level 1 and 2 are additive and determine cRF size and shape, while lateral connections within level 1 are modulatory and affect the cortical range of synchronization. Input during development is mimicked by spike trains with spatially homogeneous properties and a confined temporal correlation width. During learning, the homogeneous lateral coupling shrinks to limited coupling structures defining synchronization and related association fields (AF). The size of level-1 synchronization fields determines the lateral coupling range of developing level-1-to-2 connections and, thus, the size of level-2 cRFs, even if the feedforward connections have distance-independent delays. AFs and cRFs increase with spike velocity in the lateral network and temporal correlation width of the input. Our results suggest that AF size of V1 and cRF size of V2 neurons are confined during learning by the temporal width of input correlations and the spike velocity in lateral connections without the need of visual experience. During learning from visual experience, a similar influence of AF size on the cRF size may be operative at successive levels of processing, including other parts of the visual system.

[1]  Reinhard Eckhorn,et al.  Feature Linking via Synchronization among Distributed Assemblies: Simulations of Results from Cat Visual Cortex , 1990, Neural Computation.

[2]  C. Gray.  The Temporal Correlation Hypothesis of Visual Feature Integration Still Alive and Well , 1999, Neuron.

[3]  Reinhard Eckhorn,et al.  Parallel processing by a homogeneous group of coupled model neurons can enhance, reduce and generate signal correlations , 1997, Biological Cybernetics.

[4]  Jean Bullier,et al.  The Timing of Information Transfer in the Visual System , 1997 .

[5]  H. Markram,et al.  Redistribution of synaptic efficacy between neocortical pyramidal neurons , 1996, Nature.

[6]  Kevin Fox,et al.  A Model for the Action of NMDA Conductances in the Visual Cortex , 1992, Neural Computation.

[7]  KD Miller.  A model for the development of simple cell receptive fields and the ordered arrangement of orientation columns through activity-dependent competition between ON- and OFF-center inputs , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  D. S. Kim,et al.  Cortical direction selectivity without directional experience , 1997, Neuroreport.

[9]  D. Baylor,et al.  Synchronous bursts of action potentials in ganglion cells of the developing mammalian retina. , 1991, Science.

[10]  I Segev,et al.  Signal delay and input synchronization in passive dendritic structures. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Klaus Obermayer,et al.  Synapse Clustering Can Drive Simultaneous ON-OFF and Ocular-Dominance Segregation in a Model of Area 17 , 1997, ICANN.

[12]  W. Singer,et al.  In search of common foundations for cortical computation , 1997, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[13]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  A neuronal learning rule for sub-millisecond temporal coding , 1996, Nature.

[14]  T. Poggio,et al.  Are Cortical Models Really Bound by the “Binding Problem”? , 1999, Neuron.

[15]  M. Weliky,et al.  Correlational structure of spontaneous neuronal activity in the developing lateral geniculate nucleus in vivo. , 1999, Science.

[16]  Frank Joublin,et al.  Learning cortical topography from spatiotemporal stimuli , 2000, Biological Cybernetics.

[17]  Reinhard Eckhorn,et al.  Neural mechanisms of scene segmentation: recordings from the visual cortex suggest basic circuits for linking field models , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[18]  R. Kempter,et al.  Hebbian learning and spiking neurons , 1999 .

[19]  M. Stryker,et al.  The role of visual experience in the development of columns in cat visual cortex. , 1998, Science.

[20]  H B Barlow,et al.  Single units and sensation: a neuron doctrine for perceptual psychology? , 1972, Perception.

[21]  Günther Palm,et al.  Synaptic Delay Learning in Pulse-Coupled Neurons , 1998, Neural Computation.

[22]  R. Wong,et al.  Neuronal coupling in the developing mammalian retina , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[23]  D. Hubel,et al.  The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  N. Daw,et al.  The location and function of NMDA receptors in cat and kitten visual cortex , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[25]  D. Johnston,et al.  Regulation of Synaptic Efficacy by Coincidence of Postsynaptic APs and EPSPs , 1997 .

[26]  T. Bonhoeffer,et al.  Development of orientation preference in the mammalian visual cortex. , 1999, Journal of neurobiology.

[27]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  Jack D. Cowan,et al.  DYNAMICS OF SELF-ORGANIZED DELAY ADAPTATION , 1999 .

[29]  R. Eckhorn,et al.  Functional coupling shows stronger stimulus dependency for fast oscillations than for low‐frequency components in striate cortex of awake monkey , 2000, The European journal of neuroscience.