Theoretical detection threshold of the proton-acoustic range verification technique.

PURPOSE Range verification in proton therapy using the proton-acoustic signal induced in the Bragg peak was investigated for typical clinical scenarios. The signal generation and detection processes were simulated in order to determine the signal-to-noise limits. METHODS An analytical model was used to calculate the dose distribution and local pressure rise (per proton) for beams of different energy (100 and 160 MeV) and spot widths (1, 5, and 10 mm) in a water phantom. In this method, the acoustic waves propagating from the Bragg peak were generated by the general 3D pressure wave equation implemented using a finite element method. Various beam pulse widths (0.1-10 μs) were simulated by convolving the acoustic waves with Gaussian kernels. A realistic PZT ultrasound transducer (5 cm diameter) was simulated with a Butterworth bandpass filter with consideration of random noise based on a model of thermal noise in the transducer. The signal-to-noise ratio on a per-proton basis was calculated, determining the minimum number of protons required to generate a detectable pulse. The maximum spatial resolution of the proton-acoustic imaging modality was also estimated from the signal spectrum. RESULTS The calculated noise in the transducer was 12-28 mPa, depending on the transducer central frequency (70-380 kHz). The minimum number of protons detectable by the technique was on the order of 3-30 × 10(6) per pulse, with 30-800 mGy dose per pulse at the Bragg peak. Wider pulses produced signal with lower acoustic frequencies, with 10 μs pulses producing signals with frequency less than 100 kHz. CONCLUSIONS The proton-acoustic process was simulated using a realistic model and the minimal detection limit was established for proton-acoustic range validation. These limits correspond to a best case scenario with a single large detector with no losses and detector thermal noise as the sensitivity limiting factor. Our study indicated practical proton-acoustic range verification may be feasible with approximately 5 × 10(6) protons/pulse and beam current.

[1]  Lei Xing,et al.  X-ray acoustic computed tomography with pulsed x-ray beam from a medical linear accelerator. , 2012, Medical physics.

[2]  M. J. Garcia-Hernandez,et al.  Designing amplifiers with very low output noise for high impedance piezoelectric transducers , 2005 .

[3]  C. Sehgal,et al.  Proton beam characterization by proton-induced acoustic emission: simulation studies , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Katia Parodi,et al.  In-beam PET measurements of β+ radioactivity induced by proton beams , 2002 .

[5]  V Moskvin,et al.  TH-C-144-01: BEST IN PHYSICS (THERAPY) - Use of Radiation-Induced Ultrasound to Image Proton Dosimetry. , 2013, Medical physics.

[6]  Alexander A. Oraevsky,et al.  Ultimate sensitivity of time-resolved optoacoustic detection , 2000, BiOS.

[7]  K Parodi,et al.  Ionoacoustic characterization of the proton Bragg peak with submillimeter accuracy. , 2015, Medical physics.

[8]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicine , 2006 .

[9]  K. Stantz,et al.  Feasibility of RACT for 3D dose measurement and range verification in a water phantom. , 2015, Medical physics.

[10]  A J Lomax,et al.  Intensity modulated proton therapy and its sensitivity to treatment uncertainties 2: the potential effects of inter-fraction and inter-field motions , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Chan Hyeong Kim,et al.  Prompt gamma measurements for locating the dose falloff region in the proton therapy , 2006 .

[12]  E Pedroni,et al.  Experimental characterization and physical modelling of the dose distribution of scanned proton pencil beams , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  M. Levi,et al.  Experimental Studies of the Acoustic Signature of Proton Beams Traversing Fluid Media , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[14]  Ronald S. Dingus,et al.  Grüneisen-stress-induced ablation of biological tissue , 1991, Photonics West - Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering.

[15]  T Inada,et al.  Time resolved properties of acoustic pulses generated in water and in soft tissue by pulsed proton beam irradiation--a possibility of doses distribution monitoring in proton radiation therapy. , 1991, Medical physics.

[16]  Hirohiko Tsujii,et al.  Acoustic pulse generated in a patient during treatment by pulsed proton radiation beam , 1995 .

[17]  D Robertson,et al.  Optimizing a three-stage Compton camera for measuring prompt gamma rays emitted during proton radiotherapy , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  N A Baily,et al.  A review of the processes by which ultrasound is generated through the interaction of ionizing radiation and irradiated materials: some possible applications. , 1992, Medical physics.

[19]  Lihong V Wang,et al.  Noise-equivalent sensitivity of photoacoustics , 2013, Journal of biomedical optics.

[20]  M. Levi,et al.  Experimental Studies of the Acoustic Signature of Proton Beams Traversing Fluid Media , 1979 .

[21]  B. Dolgoshein,et al.  ACOUSTIC DETECTION OF HIGH-ENERGY PARTICLE SHOWERS IN WATER , 1979 .

[22]  B T Cox,et al.  k-Wave: MATLAB toolbox for the simulation and reconstruction of photoacoustic wave fields. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.