Social functionalist frameworks for judgment and choice: intuitive politicians, theologians, and prosecutors.

Research on judgment and choice has been dominated by functionalist assumptions that depict people as either intuitive scientists animated by epistemic goals or intuitive economists animated by utilitarian ones. This article identifies 3 alternative social functionalist starting points for inquiry: people as pragmatic politicians trying to cope with accountability demands from key constituencies in their lives, principled theologians trying to protect sacred values from secular encroachments, and prudent prosecutors trying to enforce social norms. Each functionalist framework stimulates middle-range theories that specify (a) cognitive-affective-behavioral strategies of coping with adaptive challenges and (b) the implications of these coping strategies for identifying empirical and normative boundary conditions on judgmental tendencies classified as errors or biases within the dominant research programs.

[1]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  Reason-based choice , 1993, Cognition.

[2]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. , 1999 .

[3]  C. Geertz.  Local Knowledge: Further Essays In Interpretive Anthropology , 1983 .

[4]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[5]  Z. Kunda,et al.  Social Cognition: Making Sense of People , 1999 .

[6]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Rage and reason: the psychology of the intuitive prosecutor , 1999 .

[7]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  Accuracy motivation attenuates covert priming: The systematic reprocessing of social information. , 1994 .

[8]  Sister Mechtraud join,et al.  The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life , 1955 .

[9]  Michael A. Becker.  Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles , 1998 .

[10]  R. Zajonc.  SOCIAL FACILITATION. , 1965, Science.

[11]  S. Read,et al.  Explanatory coherence in social explanations : a parallel distributed processing account , 1993 .

[12]  P. Tetlock,et al.  The psychology of the unthinkable: taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Steven Shavell,et al.  Punitive Damages: An Economic Analysis , 1998 .

[14]  I. Simonson,et al.  Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects , 1989 .

[15]  P. Meehl.  Appraising and Amending Theories: The Strategy of Lakatosian Defense and Two Principles that Warrant It , 1990 .

[16]  R. Abrams,et al.  Psychological sources of ambiguity avoidance , 1986 .

[17]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  Impression management versus intrapsychic explanations in social psychology - a useful dichotomy , 1985 .

[18]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  Accountability amplifies the status quo effect when change creates victims , 1994 .

[19]  I. Lakatos.  Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1976 .

[20]  Julie H. Goldberg,et al.  Sober Second Thought: The Effects of Accountability, Anger, and Authoritarianism on Attributions of Responsibility , 1998 .

[21]  Rashed A. Chowdhury.  ACCOUNTS , 1997, Journal of The Royal Naval Medical Service.

[22]  L. Cosmides,et al.  Mapping the mind: Origins of domain specificity: The evolution of functional organization , 1994 .

[23]  F. Eggan,et al.  The savage mind . Structure and function in primitive society , 1999 .

[24]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: conformity, complexity, and bolstering. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  Accountability for Consequential Decisions: Justifying Ethical Judgments to Audiences , 1999 .

[27]  William Samuelson,et al.  Status quo bias in decision making , 1988 .

[28]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choices, Values, and Frames , 2000 .

[29]  J. Frank Yates,et al.  Effects of procedural and outcome accountability on judgment quality , 1996 .

[30]  P. Tetlock.  Cognitive Biases and Organizational Correctives: Do Both Disease and Cure Depend on the Politics of the Beholder? , 2000 .

[31]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Providing public assistance: Cognitive and motivational processes underlying liberal and conservative policy preferences. , 1993 .

[32]  J. Baron,et al.  Intuitions about penalties and compensation in the context of tort law , 1993 .

[33]  M. Lerner,et al.  The Justice motive in social behavior : adapting to times of scarcity and change , 1981 .

[34]  S. Andersen,et al.  Responding to significant others when they are not there: Effects on interpersonal inference, motivation, and affect , 1996 .

[35]  J. Sayers.  Against Method , 2016 .

[36]  S. J. Motowidlo,et al.  Effects of Rater Accountability on the Accuracy and the Favorability of Performance Ratings , 2004 .

[37]  Itamar Simonson,et al.  The effect of accountability on susceptibility to decision errors , 1992 .

[38]  P. Tetlock.  Accountability: A social check on the fundamental attribution error. , 1985 .

[39]  Berndt Brehmer,et al.  Does having to justify one's judgments change the nature of the judgment process? , 1983 .

[40]  Jeannine Bell,et al.  Hate Crimes: Criminal Law and Identity Politics , 2001 .

[41]  Joe Cain,et al.  Progress and its problems , 1999 .

[42]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  Attitudes Toward Managing Hazardous Waste: What Should Be Cleaned Up and Who Should Pay for It? , 1993 .

[43]  A. Greenwald.  The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. , 1980 .

[44]  A. Kruglanski.  Lay epistemics and human knowledge , 1989 .

[45]  Phillip E. Tetlock.  Accountability theory: Mixing properties of human agents with properties of social systems. , 1999 .

[46]  J. Baron,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Choice Rules Favored for High-Stakes Decisions , 1995 .

[47]  Bharat Maldé,et al.  Interpersonal relations — a theory of interdependence , 1979 .

[48]  Efrat Neter,et al.  The effect of motivation of judgment depends on the difficulty of the judgment. , 1995 .

[49]  T. Gilovich,et al.  The spotlight effect in social judgment: an egocentric bias in estimates of the salience of one's own actions and appearance. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[50]  Sandy Lovie.  How the mind works , 1980, Nature.

[51]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  The Self and social life , 1987 .

[52]  Itamar Simonson,et al.  Deescalation Strategies: A Comparison of Techniques for Reducing Commitment to Losing Courses of Action , 1992 .

[53]  Robert H. Ashton,et al.  Effects of justification and a mechanical aid on judgment performance , 1992 .

[54]  B. R. Schlenker.  Translating Actions into Attitudes: An Identity-Analytic Approach to the Explanation of Social Conduct1 , 1982 .

[55]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[56]  H. Kelley.  Attribution in social interaction. , 1987 .

[57]  R. Thaler,et al.  Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle , 1993 .

[58]  S. Glucksberg,et al.  When love is not a journey: What metaphors mean , 1999 .

[59]  R. Provencher.  Ethnic Groups in Conflict , 1988, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[60]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[61]  Melanie C. Green,et al.  Coping with Accountability Cross-Pressures: Low-Effort Evasive Tactics and High-Effort Quests for Complex Compromises , 2000 .

[62]  Donald T. Campbell,et al.  History, psychology, and science : selected papers , 1963 .

[63]  W. Mischel,et al.  A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. , 1995, Psychological review.

[64]  A. Tesser.  On the Confluence of Self-Esteem Maintenance Mechanisms , 2000 .

[65]  P. Tetlock.  Accountability and the perseverance of first impressions. , 1983 .

[66]  John Cohen.  Social Learning and Imitation , 1945, Nature.

[67]  A. Cohen,et al.  The Functional Prerequisites of a Society , 1950, Ethics.

[68]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  The Social Psychology of Punishment Reactions , 1981 .

[69]  William J. McGuire,et al.  A Contextualist Theory of Knowledge: Its Implications for Innovation and Reform in Psychological Research* , 1983 .

[70]  John R. Searle,et al.  The Rediscovery of the Mind , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[71]  J. Haidt.  The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. , 2001, Psychological review.

[72]  W. Edwards.  Subjective probabilities inferred from decisions. , 1962, Psychological review.

[73]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Role of consciousness and accessibility of death-related thoughts in mortality salience effects. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[74]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Flexible correction processes in social judgment: the role of naive theories in corrections for perceived bias. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[75]  J. Forgas.  Mood and judgment: the affect infusion model (AIM). , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[76]  Gün R. Semin,et al.  The accountability of conduct : a social psychological analysis , 1984 .

[77]  L. Thompson,et al.  The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator , 1997 .

[78]  D. Spalding.  The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.

[79]  Cass R. Sunstein,et al.  Assessing Punitive Damages... , 1997 .

[80]  D. Keltner,et al.  Embarrassment: its distinct form and appeasement functions. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[81]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Attribution bias: On the inconclusiveness of the cognition-motivation debate , 1982 .

[82]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  Accountability and complexity of thought. , 1983 .

[83]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring ☆ , 1983 .

[84]  D. Gilbert.  How mental systems believe. , 1991 .

[85]  E. Durkheim.  FROM THE ELEMENTARY FORMS OF THE RELIGIOUS LIFE , 1996, The New Economic Sociology.

[86]  P. Tetlock.  The Impact of Accountability on Judgment and Choice: Toward A Social Contingency Model , 1992 .

[87]  Randall S. Peterson,et al.  Revising the value pluralism model: Incorporating social content and context postulates. , 1996 .

[88]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Social Justice and Social Movements , 1995 .

[89]  Colin S. Brown,et al.  The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations , 1991 .

[90]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Taboo Trade‐offs: Reactions to Transactions That Transgress the Spheres of Justice , 1997 .

[91]  Jane Kennedy,et al.  Debiasing Audit Judgment With Accountability - A Framework And Experimental Results , 1993 .

[92]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Accounting for the effects of accountability. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[93]  Robert B. Edgerton,et al.  Rules, Exceptions and Social Order , 1985 .

[94]  S. Gelman,et al.  Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity In Cognition And Culture , 1994 .

[95]  Robert Liebendorfer.  Mind, self and society , 1960 .

[96]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Accountability: a social magnifier of the dilution effect. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[97]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivated closing of the mind: "seizing" and "freezing". , 1996, Psychological review.

[98]  M. Lerner,et al.  The Justice Motive in Social Behavior , 1981 .

[99]  R. Murphy.  The Effects of Task Characteristics on Covariation Assessment: The Impact of Accountability and Judgment Frame , 1994 .

[100]  M. Watve.  The Red Queen: Sex and the evolution of human nature , 1998 .

[101]  J Friedrich,et al.  Primary error detection and minimization (PEDMIN) strategies in social cognition: a reinterpretation of confirmation bias phenomena. , 1993, Psychological review.