Travel carbon emission reduction: managing and accounting in a global company

Purpose: This case study explores how a global company does or does not adapt to climate change through changes in managerial action. Specifically, the research concerns a travel project in a global consulting company based in London, the stated aim of which was a 25% reduction of carbon emission generated by air travel in one year. The research explores the actions undertaken to achieve carbon emission reduction. Design: A case study method is employed to follow the travel project over one year to examine its contributions, if any, to carbon emission reduction. Findings: Several solutions were implemented by management aimed at reducing carbon emission by air travel. Travel incentive schemes to reduce flight travel were implemented, with a focus on new communication technology. Despite significant managerial effort, carbon was not reduced. When, at the completion of the analysis, the stated objective of achieving 25% carbon emission reduction had not been met, the company instead changed its targets to adapt to much higher levels of carbon emissions to meet its actual levels, which had increased significantly. Research limitations: This case study is limited to a branch of a global organisation, and the research focus was on air travel reduction over 12 months. Practical implications: The evidence suggests that voluntary corporate actions to reduce carbon emissions may not be workable in practice. Originality: This research examined a branch of a global company and how it tried to manage and account for a voluntary reduction of carbon.

[1]  R. Gray,et al.  It was 20 years ago today: Sgt Pepper,Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, green accounting and the Blue Meanies , 2012 .

[2]  Ki‐Hoon Lee Why and how to adopt green management into business organizations , 2009 .

[3]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[4]  M. Fraser,et al.  “Fleshing out” an engagement with a social accounting technology , 2012 .

[5]  Yen-Chun Jim Wu,et al.  Assessing the greenness effort for European firms , 2009 .

[6]  Michaela Rankin,et al.  An Investigation of Voluntary Corporate Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting in a Market Governance System: Australian Evidence , 2011 .

[7]  Rocky J. Dwyer “Keen to be green” organizations: a focused rules approach to accountability , 2009 .

[8]  J. Guthrie,et al.  Gri Sustainability Reporting Guidelines For Public And Third Sector Organizations , 2010 .

[9]  J. Lane Economic catch‐up and emission reductions , 2010 .

[10]  J. Boston,et al.  Climate change: Explaining and solving the mismatch between scientific urgency and political inertia , 2011 .

[11]  Bettina Wittneben,et al.  Carbon accounting: Negotiating accuracy, consistency and certainty across organisational fields , 2011 .

[12]  Francisco Ascui,et al.  As frames collide: making sense of carbon accounting , 2011 .

[13]  Improving Australian greenhouse gas reporting and financial analysis of carbon risk associated with investments , 2011 .

[14]  C. Windsor Can the fin ancialised atmosphere be effec tively regulated and accounted for , 2011 .

[15]  M. Milne,et al.  Climate change accounting research: keeping it interesting and different , 2011 .

[16]  S. Cooper,et al.  Climate change performance measurement, control and accountability in English local authority areas , 2011 .

[17]  J. Solomon,et al.  Private climate change reporting: an emerging discourse of risk and opportunity? , 2011 .