A probabilistic approach to fault diagnosis of industrial systems

A method for fault diagnosis of industrial systems is presented. Plant devices, sensors, actuators and diagnostic tests are described as stochastic finite-state machines. A formal composition rule of these models is given to obtain: 1) the set of admissible fault signatures; 2) their conditional probability given any fault; and 3) the conditional probability of a fault given a prescribed signature. The modularity and flexibility of this method make it suitable to deal with complex systems made by a large number of components. The method is used in an industrial automotive application, specifically the diagnosis of the throttle body and of the angular sensors measuring the throttle plate angle is described in detail.

[1]  Richard D. Braatz,et al.  Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Industrial Systems , 2001 .

[2]  Venkat Venkatasubramanian,et al.  A hybrid framework for large scale process fault diagnosis , 1997 .

[3]  Jian Guan,et al.  Diagnostic reasoning with fault propagation digraph and sequential testing , 1994 .

[4]  Michèle Basseville,et al.  Detection of abrupt changes: theory and application , 1993 .

[5]  Riccardo Scattolini,et al.  A fault detection and isolation method for complex industrial systems , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[6]  Liya Hou,et al.  Diagnosis of multiple simultaneous fault via hierarchical artificial neural networks , 1994 .

[7]  Rolf Isermann,et al.  Integrated fault detection and diagnosis , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Systems Man and Cybernetics Conference - SMC.

[8]  Paul M. Frank,et al.  Fault diagnosis in dynamic systems: theory and application , 1989 .

[9]  Stéphane Lafortune,et al.  Failure diagnosis using discrete event models , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 33rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[10]  Jan Maciej Kóscielny Fault isolation in industrial processes by the dynamic table of states method , 1995, Autom..

[11]  Michèle Basseville,et al.  Detection of Abrupt Changes: Theory and Applications. , 1995 .

[12]  Riccardo Scattolini,et al.  Design methodology for diagnostic strategies for industrial systems , 2002, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[13]  Raymond Reiter,et al.  Characterizing Diagnoses and Systems , 1992, Artif. Intell..

[14]  Richard B. Vilim,et al.  Combining physical modeling, neural processing, and likelihood testing for online process monitoring , 1998, SMC'98 Conference Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Cat. No.98CH36218).

[15]  Christos G. Cassandras,et al.  Introduction to Discrete Event Systems , 1999, The Kluwer International Series on Discrete Event Dynamic Systems.

[16]  M. Iri,et al.  An algorithm for diagnosis of system failures in the chemical process , 1979 .

[17]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  Combined qualitative-quantitative steady-state diagnosis of continuous-valued systems , 1997, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[18]  Janos Gertler,et al.  Fault detection and diagnosis in engineering systems , 1998 .

[19]  Rolf Isermann,et al.  Trends in the Application of Model Based Fault Detection and Diagnosis of Technical Processes , 1996 .