Fetal growth assessment at 11-14 wks of gestation based on a population anomaly screening program in central-eastern Poland

Objective: Correct assessment of gestational age and fetal growth is essential for optimal obstetric management. The objectives of this study were, first, to develop charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy based on sonographic biometry and, second, to derive reference curves for normal fetal growth assessed from 11 weeks 0 days to 13 weeks 6 days of gestational age. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study included a cohort of consecutive 648 pregnancies who underwent routine first-trimester aneuploidy screening between 2009 and 2013. Sonographic measurements included crown-rump length (CRL), biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL). For each measurement regression models were fitted to estimate the mean and SD. The 3 rd , 5 th , 10 th , 25 th , 50 th 75 th , 90 th , 95 th , and 97 th percentiles were estimated at each day of studied gestational age (GA) by least squares regression for the mean and SD of the CRL, BPD, AC’s functions of GA. R(2) and associated P values for the relationships between the CRL, BPD, AC, FL and birth weight at delivery and perinatal complications were calculated. Results: Final group consisted of 321 singleton pregnancies with known perinatal outcomes. Data characterizing maternal and newborns outcomes are presented. We were able to measure CRL, BPD and NT in all 321 fetuses, whereas AC was measured in only 113 cases and FL in 317 cases. We have noted that even in women with regular cycles and certain dating of LMP, there was a discrepancy in the gestation calculated from the LMP and CRL of more than 7 days in almost 20% of the cases. These results indicate that pregnancy dating should be rather based on CRL than LMP. Scatterplots of individual measurements and fitted centiles indicated good agreement with the calculated medians. The plots indicating 3 rd , 10 th , 90 th and 97 th centiles for CRL, BPD, AC and FL against gestational age are presented. Both the CRL and FL correlated significantly and strongly with biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference. Conclusions: This pilot study provides new charts for ultrasound fetal growth assessment in a singleton pregnancy based on screened population of Polish women. Our results indicate the necessity to modify and adjust the standard growth charts for ultrasound parameters existing from the last 30 years with newer fetal biometric measurements.

[1]  F. Malone,et al.  Fetal growth in early pregnancy and risk of delivering low birth weight infant: prospective cohort study , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  D. Kanon,et al.  Fetal crown-rump length: reevaluation of relation to menstrual age (5-18 weeks) with high-resolution real-time US. , 1992, Radiology.

[3]  D Timmerman,et al.  New crown–rump length curve based on over 3500 pregnancies , 2010, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[4]  D. Altman,et al.  Design and analysis of studies to derive charts of fetal size , 1993, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[5]  H. Robinson Sonar Measurement of Fetal Crown-Rump Length as Means of Assessing Maturity in First Trimester of Pregnancy , 1973 .

[6]  L. Valentin,et al.  Ultrasound dating at 12–14 or 15–20 weeks of gestation? A prospective cross‐validation of established dating formulae in a population of in‐vitro fertilized pregnancies randomized to early or late dating scan , 2004, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[7]  Polskiego Towarzystwa Ginekologicznego [Polish Gynecological Society--Ultrasound section guidelines on ultrasound screening in uncomplicated pregnancy - 2012 - guide]. , 2012, Ginekologia polska.

[8]  B. Czuba,et al.  [Evaluation of pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) and free beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (beta hCG) levels and sonographic assesement of fetal nuchal translucency (NT) in singleton pregnancies between 11 and 14 weeks of gestation--Polish multi-centre research]. , 2007, Ginekologia polska.

[9]  I. Staboulidou,et al.  Individualized growth charts for ultrasound measurements can significantly improve fetal monitoring , 2007, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[10]  R. Wegner,et al.  Detailed screening for fetal anomalies and cardiac defects at the 11–13‐week scan , 2006, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[11]  Stuart Campbell,et al.  Charts of fetal size: 2. Head measurements * , 1994, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[12]  S. Chasen,et al.  Can early ultrasound reduce the gestational age at abortion for fetal anomalies? , 2013, Contraception.

[13]  P. Royston,et al.  How to construct ‘normal ranges’ for fetal variables , 1998, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[14]  B. Czuba,et al.  Ultrasonographic assessment of fetal nuchal translucency (NT) at 11th and 14th week of gestation--Polish multicentre study. , 2007, Neuro endocrinology letters.

[15]  R. Chaoui,et al.  Small biparietal diameter in fetuses with spina bifida on 11–13‐week and mid‐gestation ultrasound , 2012, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[16]  J. B. Bremnes,et al.  The growth of the human embryo. A longitudinal biometric assessment from 7 to 12 weeks of gestation , 1998, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[17]  Y. Jacquemyn,et al.  Fetal biometry in different ethnic groups. , 2000, Early human development.

[18]  A. Hofman,et al.  Intra‐ and interobserver reproducibility study of early fetal growth parameters , 2008, Prenatal diagnosis.

[19]  F. Malone,et al.  Fetal growth in early pregnancy and risk of delivering low birth weight infant: prospective cohort study , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  Dirk Timmerman,et al.  Assessing first trimester growth: the influence of ethnic background and maternal age. , 2009, Human reproduction.

[21]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[22]  Andrzej Tretyn,et al.  Fetal biometry between 20-42 weeks of gestation for Polish population. , 2008, Ginekologia polska.

[23]  D. Altman,et al.  Charts of fetal size: 4. Femur length , 1994, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.