Temporal mechanisms of multimodal binding

The simultaneity of signals from different senses—such as vision and audition—is a useful cue for determining whether those signals arose from one environmental source or from more than one. To understand better the sensory mechanisms for assessing simultaneity, we measured the discrimination thresholds for time intervals marked by auditory, visual or auditory–visual stimuli, as a function of the base interval. For all conditions, both unimodal and cross-modal, the thresholds followed a characteristic ‘dipper function’ in which the lowest thresholds occurred when discriminating against a non-zero interval. The base interval yielding the lowest threshold was roughly equal to the threshold for discriminating asynchronous from synchronous presentations. Those lowest thresholds occurred at approximately 5, 15 and 75 ms for auditory, visual and auditory–visual stimuli, respectively. Thus, the mechanisms mediating performance with cross-modal stimuli are considerably slower than the mechanisms mediating performance within a particular sense. We developed a simple model with temporal filters of different time constants and showed that the model produces discrimination functions similar to the ones we observed in humans. Both for processing within a single sense, and for processing across senses, temporal perception is affected by the properties of temporal filters, the outputs of which are used to estimate time offsets, correlations between signals, and more.

[1]  Cross facilitation of visual and haptic motion , 2010 .

[2]  G. Sandini,et al.  Visual, tactile and visuo-tactile motion discrimination , 2010 .

[3]  G. Sandini,et al.  Cross-modal facilitation of visual and tactile motion , 2008 .

[4]  Justin A. Harris,et al.  Vision Merges With Touch in a Purely Tactile Discrimination , 2008, Psychological science.

[5]  Sidney S. Simon,et al.  Merging of the Senses , 2008, Front. Neurosci..

[6]  E. Doroshenko,et al.  [GABA metabolism and neuroactive amino acids in the rat brain in morphine withdrawal syndrome]. , 2007, Biomeditsinskaia khimiia.

[7]  Shin’ya Nishida,et al.  Feature-based processing of audio-visual synchrony perception revealed by random pulse trains , 2007, Vision Research.

[8]  U. Karmarkar,et al.  Timing in the Absence of Clocks: Encoding Time in Neural Network States , 2007, Neuron.

[9]  P. Montague,et al.  Motor-Sensory Recalibration Leads to an Illusory Reversal of Action and Sensation , 2006, Neuron.

[10]  David Alais,et al.  Perceptual synchrony of audiovisual streams for natural and artificial motion sequences. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[11]  David Burr,et al.  Time Perception: Space–Time in the Brain , 2006, Current Biology.

[12]  Waka Fujisaki,et al.  Temporal frequency characteristics of synchrony–asynchrony discrimination of audio-visual signals , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Simon Carlile,et al.  Synchronizing to real events: subjective audiovisual alignment scales with perceived auditory depth and speed of sound. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  P. Bertelson,et al.  Recalibration of temporal order perception by exposure to audio-visual asynchrony. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[15]  W. Meck,et al.  Cortico-striatal circuits and interval timing: coincidence detection of oscillatory processes. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[16]  L. Harris,et al.  Simultaneity Constancy , 2004, Perception.

[17]  S. Nishida,et al.  Recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  D. Buonomano,et al.  The neural basis of temporal processing. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[19]  M. Landy,et al.  Why Is Spatial Stereoresolution So Low? , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  D. Burr,et al.  The Ventriloquist Effect Results from Near-Optimal Bimodal Integration , 2004, Current Biology.

[21]  C. Spence,et al.  Audiovisual temporal order judgments , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  Tracey D. Berger,et al.  Flicker flutter: is an illusory event as good as the real thing? , 2003, Journal of vision.

[23]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Auditory capture of vision: examining temporal ventriloquism. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[24]  S. Gepshtein,et al.  Viewing Geometry Determines How Vision and Haptics Combine in Size Perception , 2003, Current Biology.

[25]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Visual illusion induced by sound. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[26]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[27]  R Fendrich,et al.  The temporal cross-capture of audition and vision , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Illusions: What you see is what you hear , 2000, Nature.

[29]  J. Staddon,et al.  Time and memory: towards a pacemaker-free theory of interval timing. , 1999, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[30]  D. Heeger,et al.  Neuronal basis of contrast discrimination , 1999, Vision Research.

[31]  M. Morrone,et al.  Motion analysis by feature tracking , 1998, Vision Research.

[32]  W. Simpson,et al.  Pedestal effect in visual motion discrimination. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[33]  B. Moore,et al.  Modeling the additivity of nonsimultaneous masking , 1994, Hearing Research.

[34]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Human luminance pattern-vision mechanisms: masking experiments require a new model. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[35]  M. Morgan,et al.  Motion-deblurring in human vision , 1989, Nature.

[36]  D. Burr,et al.  Feature detection in human vision: a phase-dependent energy model , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[37]  G. Legge,et al.  Contrast discrimination in noise. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[38]  S. Harnad Psychophysical and cognitive aspects of categorical perception: A critical overview , 1987 .

[39]  D G Pelli,et al.  Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[40]  Robert J. Logan,et al.  Categorical perception, category boundary effects, and continuous perception: A reply to Hary and Massaro , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  P. Fraisse Perception and estimation of time. , 1984, Annual review of psychology.

[42]  R. Watt,et al.  The recognition and representation of edge blur: Evidence for spatial primitives in human vision , 1983, Vision Research.

[43]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  D. Massaro,et al.  Categorical results do not imply categorical perception , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  F. J. J. Blommaert,et al.  Temporal impulse and step responses of the human eye obtained psychophysically by means of a drift-correcting perturbation technique , 1981, Vision Research.

[46]  D. Burr Temporal summation of moving images by the human visual system , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[47]  A. K. Myers,et al.  Matching the rate of concurrent tone bursts and light flashes as a function of flash surround luminance , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[48]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Contrast masking in human vision. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[49]  Nathaniel I. Durlach,et al.  Chapter 11 – MODELS OF BINAURAL INTERACTION , 1978 .

[50]  B. Moore An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing , 1977 .

[51]  J Nachmias,et al.  Letter: Grating contrast: discrimination may be better than detection. , 1974, Vision research.

[52]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Theoretical notes. Motor theory of speech perception: a reply to Lane's critical review. , 1970, Psychological review.

[53]  J. Nachmias,et al.  Visual detection and discrimination of luminance increments. , 1970, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[54]  J. Robson Spatial and Temporal Contrast-Sensitivity Functions of the Visual System , 1966 .

[55]  T SHIPLEY,et al.  Auditory Flutter-Driving of Visual Flicker , 1964, Science.

[56]  M. Treisman Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval. Implications for a model of the "internal clock". , 1963, Psychological monographs.

[57]  R. Nichols,et al.  Prediction of the first year college performance of high aptitude students. , 1963, Psychological monographs.

[58]  Michael J. S. Dewar,et al.  The s.p-o. (split-p-orbital) method, II. Further definition and application to acctylene , 1961, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[59]  I. Hirsh,et al.  Perceived order in different sense modalities. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[60]  Mowbray Gh,et al.  On discriminating the rate of visual flicker and auditory flutter. , 1959 .

[61]  G H MOWBRAY,et al.  On discriminating the rate of visual flicker and auditory flutter. , 1959, The American journal of psychology.

[62]  B. C. Griffith,et al.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[63]  H B BARLOW,et al.  Increment thresholds at low intensities considered as signal/noise discriminations , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[64]  H. D. L. Dzn Relationship between Critical Flicker-Frequency and a Set of Low-Frequency Characteristics of the Eye , 1954 .

[65]  H L DE DZN Relationship between critical flicker-frequency and a set of low-frequency characteristics of the eye. , 1954, Journal of the Optical Society of America.