Search task features in work tasks of varying types and complexity

Information searching in practice seldom is an end in itself. In work, work task (WT) performance forms the context, which information searching should serve. Therefore, information retrieval (IR) systems development/evaluation should take the WT context into account. The present paper analyzes how WT features: task complexity and task types, affect information searching in authentic work: the types of information needs, search processes, and search media. We collected data on 22 information professionals in authentic work situations in three organization types: city administration, universities, and companies. The data comprise 286 WTs and 420 search tasks (STs). The data include transaction logs, video recordings, daily questionnaires, interviews. and observation. The data were analyzed quantitatively. Even if the participants used a range of search media, most STs were simple throughout the data, and up to 42% of WTs did not include searching. WT's effects on STs are not straightforward: different WT types react differently to WT complexity. Due to the simplicity of authentic searching, the WT/ST types in interactive IR experiments should be reconsidered.

[1]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Task complexity affects information seeking and use , 1995 .

[2]  Zhizhong Li,et al.  Task complexity: A review and conceptualization framework , 2012 .

[3]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Task-Based Information Interaction Evaluation , 2015, ACM Trans. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Jia Tina Du,et al.  The information journey of marketing professionals: Incorporating work task‐driven information seeking, information judgments, information use, and information sharing , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Task complexity and information searching in administrative tasks revisited , 2012, IIiX.

[6]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  The SST method: a tool for analysing Web information search processes , 2004, Inf. Process. Manag..

[7]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  A faceted approach to conceptualizing tasks in information seeking , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[8]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Task complexity affects information use: a questionnaire study in city administration , 2013, Inf. Res..

[9]  Michael A. Shepherd,et al.  The impact of task on the usage of web browser navigation mechanisms , 2006, Graphics Interface.

[10]  Chirag Shah,et al.  User Activity Patterns During Information Search , 2015, ACM Trans. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Sanna Kumpulainen,et al.  Trails across the heterogeneous information environment: Manual integration patterns of search systems in molecular medicine , 2014, J. Documentation.

[12]  Jacqueline Algon Classifications of tasks, steps, and information-related behaviors of individuals on project terms , 1997 .

[13]  Elaine Toms Task-based information searching and retrieval , 2011, Interactive Information Seeking, Behaviour and Retrieval.

[14]  Jingjing Liu,et al.  Exploring search task difficulty reasons in different task types and user knowledge groups , 2015, Inf. Process. Manag..

[15]  JärvelinKalervo,et al.  Task complexity affects information seeking and use , 1995 .

[16]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Information interaction in molecular medicine: integrated use of multiple channels , 2010, IIiX.

[17]  Maja Zumer,et al.  Interactive Information Seeking, Behaviour and Retrieval , 2012, Program.

[18]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal: A longitudinal case study , 2003, Inf. Process. Manag..

[19]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Task-based information searching , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[20]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface , 1989 .

[21]  Pia Borlund,et al.  The IIR evaluation model: a framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems , 2003, Inf. Res..

[22]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Task Complexity Affects Information Seeking and Use , 1995, Inf. Process. Manag..

[23]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Modeling and analysis of cross-session search tasks , 2011, SIGIR.

[24]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Queries in authentic work tasks: the effects of task type and complexity , 2016, J. Documentation.

[25]  Elaine Toms,et al.  Untangling search task complexity and difficulty in the context of interactive information retrieval studies , 2014, J. Documentation.

[26]  Diane Kelly,et al.  Measuring online information seeking context, Part 2: Findings and discussion , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[27]  Preben Hansen,et al.  Task-based Information Seeking and Retrieval in the Patent Domain: Processes and Relationships , 2011 .

[28]  J. Hackman Effects of task characteristics on group products , 1968 .

[29]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  Researchers’ e-journal use and information seeking behaviour , 2010, J. Inf. Sci..

[30]  Preben Hansen,et al.  Conceptual framework for tasks in information studies , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[31]  Jacek Gwizdka,et al.  What Can Searching Behavior Tell Us About the Difficulty of Information Tasks? A Study of Web Navigation , 2007, ASIST.

[32]  Robert G. Capra,et al.  NSF workshop on task-based information search systems , 2013, SIGIR Forum.

[33]  Yuelin Li,et al.  Exploring the relationships between work task and search task in information search , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[34]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  The Turn - Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context , 2005, The Kluwer International Series on Information Retrieval.

[35]  Nils Pharo,et al.  A new model of information behaviour based on the Search Situation Transition schema , 2004, Inf. Res..

[36]  M. Hakel,et al.  Effects of Objective and Subjective Task Complexity on Performance , 1997 .

[37]  Andrei Broder,et al.  A taxonomy of web search , 2002, SIGF.

[38]  Jonathan Foster,et al.  Collaborative information seeking and retrieval , 2006, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..