The use of 'Snoezelen' as multisensory stimulation with people with intellectual disabilities: a review of the research.

The past 15 years have seen a marked increase in the use of Snoezelen with a wide range of groups including people with intellectual disabilities. Research has been undertaken with respect to a variety of behaviors, notably changes in affect, challenging behavior, relaxation and interactions with both other persons and objects. Typically studies have adopted an applied behavior analysis approach, with a small number employing physiological measures. Research designs vary markedly in their technical adequacy and the participants have a wide range of intellectual disability, age, and additional characteristics such as autism. Much of the literature reviewed demonstrates a wide range of positive outcomes when Snoezelen Vs non-Snoezelen environments are contrasted, though there is little evidence of generalisation even to the immediate post-Snoezelen environment. Several studies, however, do yield entirely negative outcomes. It is difficult to attribute these differing outcomes to either participant characteristics or contrasted designs, given the diversity of approaches to evaluation and the relatively small number of studies. The review also addresses the issue of staff and carer attitudes and the place of Snoezelen in facilitating positive interactions, incidental to any specific sensory effects. Attention is drawn to the need to improve research designs in studying Snoezelen and to developing a clearer theoretical basis for use of this approach.

[1]  G. Murphy Understanding challenging behaviour , 1994 .

[2]  Sarah H. Martin,et al.  Making Sense of Multisensory Rooms for People with Learning Disabilities , 1994 .

[3]  E. Gaffan,et al.  Behavioural effects of long-term multi-sensory stimulation. , 1998, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[4]  An explorative study of the function of a multisensory environment , 1998 .

[5]  L. Haig,et al.  How Do Clients Benefit from Snoezelen? An Exploratory Study , 1992 .

[6]  Colin Robson,et al.  Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers , 1993 .

[7]  Chia Swee Hong,et al.  People with learning disabilities and multisensory environments , 1998 .

[8]  Manfred S. Green,et al.  THE EFFICACY OF THE “SNOEZELEN” IN THE MANAGEMENT OF CHILDREN WITH MENTAL RETARDATION WHO EXHIBIT MALADAPTIVE BEHAVIOURS , 1997 .

[9]  W. Lindsay,et al.  A comparison of the effects of four therapy procedures on concentration and responsiveness in people with profound learning disabilities. , 1997, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.

[10]  J. Hogg,et al.  Making leisure provision for people with profound learning and multiple disabilities , 1995 .

[11]  The effects of multisensory environments on older people with dementia. , 1998, Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing.

[12]  S. Ayer Use of multi-sensory rooms for children with profound and multiple learning disabilities , 1998 .

[13]  D M Baer,et al.  An implicit technology of generalization. , 1977, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[14]  Paul Withers,et al.  Successful Treatment of Severe Self Injury Incorporating the Use of DRO, a Snoezelen Room and Orientation Cues , 1995 .

[15]  W. Lindsay,et al.  Snoezelen: Its Effects on Concentration and Responsiveness in People with Profound Multiple Handicaps , 1995 .

[16]  J. Mansell,et al.  Severe Learning Disabilities and Challenging Behaviours: Designing high quality services , 1994 .

[17]  R. Scheerenberger A history of mental retardation , 1983 .