Tumor Growth Prediction with Hyperelastic Biomechanical Model, Physiological Data Fusion, and Nonlinear Optimization

Tumor growth prediction is usually achieved by physiological modeling and model personalization from clinical measurements. Although image-based frameworks have been proposed with promising results, different issues such as infinitesimal strain assumption, complicated optimization procedures, and lack of functional information, may limit the prediction performance. Therefore, we propose a framework which comprises a hyperelastic biomechanical model for better physiological plausibility, gradient-free nonlinear optimization for more flexible choices of models and objective functions, and physiological data fusion of structural and functional images for better subject-specificity. Experiments were performed on synthetic and clinical data to verify parameter estimation capability and prediction performance of the framework. Comparisons of using different biomechanical models and objective functions were also performed. From the experimental results on eight patient data sets, the recall, precision, and relative volume difference (RVD) between predicted and measured tumor volumes are 84.85 ± 6.15%, 87.08 ± 7.83%, and 13.81 ± 6.64% respectively.

[1]  K. Bae,et al.  Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches. , 2010, Radiology.

[2]  Y. Fung,et al.  Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues , 1981 .

[3]  James H. Brown,et al.  A general model for ontogenetic growth , 2001, Nature.

[4]  S. Cowin,et al.  Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues, 2nd ed. , 1994 .

[5]  Gerhard A. Holzapfel,et al.  Nonlinear Solid Mechanics: A Continuum Approach for Engineering Science , 2000 .

[6]  Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos,et al.  Causes, consequences, and remedies for growth-induced solid stress in murine and human tumors , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  T. Rowan Functional stability analysis of numerical algorithms , 1990 .

[8]  K. Bathe Finite Element Procedures , 1995 .

[9]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Realistic simulation of the 3-D growth of brain tumors in MR images coupling diffusion with biomechanical deformation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  An image-driven parameter estimation problem for a reaction–diffusion glioma growth model with mass effects , 2008, Journal of mathematical biology.

[11]  M Kormano,et al.  Extravascular contrast material: the major component of contrast enhancement. , 1976, Radiology.

[12]  Joachim Hornegger,et al.  Self-gated Radial MRI for Respiratory Motion Compensation on Hybrid PET/MR Systems , 2013, MICCAI.

[13]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Kidney Tumor Growth Prediction by Coupling Reaction–Diffusion and Biomechanical Model , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Multimodal Image Driven Patient Specific Tumor Growth Modeling , 2013, MICCAI.