Robust self-testing of steerable quantum assemblages and its applications on device-independent quantum certification

Given a Bell inequality, if its maximal quantum violation can be achieved only by a single set of measurements for each party or a single quantum state, up to local unitaries, one refers to such a phenomenon as "self-testing". For instance, the maximal quantum violation of the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality certifies that the underlying state contains the two-qubit maximally entangled state and the measurements of one party (say, Alice) contains a pair of anti-commuting qubit observables. As a consequence, the other party (say, Bob) automatically verifies his set of states remotely steered by Alice, namely the "assemblage", is in the eigenstates of a pair of anti-commuting observables. It is natural to ask if the quantum violation of the Bell inequality is not maximally achieved, are we capable of estimating how close the underlying assemblage is to the reference one? In this work, we provide a systematic device-independent estimation by proposing a framework called "robust self-testing of steerable quantum assemblages". In particular, we consider assemblages violating several paradigmatic Bell inequalities and obtain the robust self-testing statement for each scenario. Our result is device-independent (DI), i.e., no assumption is made on the shared state and the measurement devices involved. Our work thus not only paves a way for exploring the connection between the boundary of quantum set of correlations and steerable assemblages, but also provides a useful tool in the areas of DI quantum certification. As two explicit applications, we show 1) that it can be used for an alternative proof of the protocol of DI certification of all entangled states proposed by Bowles et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 180503 (2018)], and 2) that it can be used to verify all non-entanglement-breaking channels with fewer assumptions compared with the work of Rosset et al. [Phys. Rev. X 8, 021033 (2018)].

[1]  Armin Tavakoli,et al.  Self-testing quantum states and measurements in the prepare-and-measure scenario , 2018, Physical Review A.

[2]  A. Acín,et al.  Bounding the set of quantum correlations. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[3]  V. Scarani,et al.  One-sided device-independent quantum key distribution: Security, feasibility, and the connection with steering , 2011, 1109.1435.

[4]  G. H. Aguilar,et al.  Detection of entanglement in asymmetric quantum networks and multipartite quantum steering , 2014, Nature Communications.

[5]  A. Jamiołkowski An effective method of investigation of positive maps on the set of positive definite operators , 1974 .

[6]  Pavel Sekatski,et al.  Noise-Resistant Device-Independent Certification of Bell State Measurements. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[7]  J. S. BELLt Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox , 2018 .

[8]  A. Acín,et al.  A convergent hierarchy of semidefinite programs characterizing the set of quantum correlations , 2008, 0803.4290.

[9]  Armin Tavakoli,et al.  Self-testing nonprojective quantum measurements in prepare-and-measure experiments , 2018, Science Advances.

[10]  A. Cabello,et al.  Self-testing properties of Gisin's elegant Bell inequality , 2017, 1706.02130.

[11]  Stefano Pironio,et al.  Convergent Relaxations of Polynomial Optimization Problems with Noncommuting Variables , 2009, SIAM J. Optim..

[12]  Werner,et al.  Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[13]  Paul Skrzypczyk,et al.  Maximal Randomness Generation from Steering Inequality Violations Using Qudits. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[14]  Miguel Navascues,et al.  Robust Self Testing of Unknown Quantum Systems into Any Entangled Two-Qubit States , 2013 .

[15]  Shuangshuang Fu,et al.  Channel-state duality , 2013 .

[16]  Shin-Liang Chen,et al.  Exploring the framework of assemblage moment matrices and its applications in device-independent characterizations , 2018, Physical Review A.

[17]  Nicolas Gisin,et al.  Exploring the Limits of Quantum Nonlocality with Entangled Photons , 2015, 1506.01649.

[18]  S. Wehner,et al.  Bell Nonlocality , 2013, 1303.2849.

[19]  Leandro Aolita,et al.  The Resource Theory of Steering , 2015, TQC.

[20]  Otfried Gühne,et al.  Quantum steering , 2019, Reviews of Modern Physics.

[21]  Miguel Navascués,et al.  Robust and versatile black-box certification of quantum devices. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[22]  T. H. Yang,et al.  Robust self-testing of the singlet , 2012, 1203.2976.

[23]  E. Schrödinger Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems , 1935, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[24]  Randall C. Thompson,et al.  Experimental Test of Local Hidden-Variable Theories , 1976 .

[25]  A C Doherty,et al.  Steering, entanglement, nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[26]  Otfried Gühne,et al.  One-to-One Mapping between Steering and Joint Measurability Problems. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[27]  Tamás Vértesi,et al.  Joint measurability, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering, and Bell nonlocality. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[28]  Jędrzej Kaniewski,et al.  Analytic and Nearly Optimal Self-Testing Bounds for the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt and Mermin Inequalities. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[29]  Daniel Cavalcanti,et al.  Inequivalence of entanglement, steering, and Bell nonlocality for general measurements , 2015, 1501.03332.

[30]  M. Wolf,et al.  Measurements incompatible in quantum theory cannot be measured jointly in any other no-signaling theory. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[31]  Valerio Scarani,et al.  THE DEVICE-INDEPENDENT OUTLOOK ON QUANTUM PHYSICS , 2013 .

[32]  Nicolas Brunner,et al.  Self-Testing Entangled Measurements in Quantum Networks. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[33]  J. Kaniewski,et al.  Robust self-testing of two-qubit states , 2019, Physical Review A.

[34]  Matthew F. Pusey,et al.  Negativity and steering: A stronger Peres conjecture , 2013, 1305.1767.

[35]  Shin-Liang Chen,et al.  Natural Framework for Device-Independent Quantification of Quantum Steerability, Measurement Incompatibility, and Self-Testing. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[36]  Yeong-Cherng Liang,et al.  A resource theory of quantum memories and their faithful verification with minimal assumptions , 2017, 1710.04710.

[37]  Antonio Acín,et al.  Device-Independent Entanglement Certification of All Entangled States. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[38]  V. Scarani,et al.  Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[39]  Stefano Pironio,et al.  Randomness versus nonlocality and entanglement. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[40]  Man-Duen Choi Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices , 1975 .

[41]  Joseph Bowles,et al.  Self-testing of Pauli observables for device-independent entanglement certification , 2018, Physical Review A.

[42]  A. Shimony,et al.  Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden Variable Theories. , 1969 .

[43]  Paul Skrzypczyk,et al.  Quantitative relations between measurement incompatibility, quantum steering, and nonlocality , 2016, 1601.07450.

[44]  Otfried Gühne,et al.  Joint measurability of generalized measurements implies classicality. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[45]  J. Watrous,et al.  Necessary and sufficient quantum information characterization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[46]  Miguel Navascués,et al.  Quantifying Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[47]  Yeong-Cherng Liang,et al.  Quantum fidelity measures for mixed states , 2018, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[48]  Stefano Pironio,et al.  Sum-of-squares decompositions for a family of Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt-like inequalities and their application to self-testing , 2015, 1504.06960.

[49]  Stefano Pironio,et al.  Optimal randomness certification from one entangled bit , 2015, 1505.03837.

[50]  Nicolas Gisin,et al.  Measurement-device-independent entanglement witnesses for all entangled quantum states. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[51]  Andrew Chi-Chih Yao,et al.  Quantum cryptography with imperfect apparatus , 1998, Proceedings 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No.98CB36280).

[52]  B. S. Cirel'son Quantum generalizations of Bell's inequality , 1980 .

[53]  D Cavalcanti,et al.  Quantum steering: a review with focus on semidefinite programming , 2016, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[54]  Francesco Buscemi,et al.  All entangled quantum states are nonlocal. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[55]  A. Uhlmann The "transition probability" in the state space of a ∗-algebra , 1976 .

[56]  Stephanie Wehner,et al.  The Quantum Moment Problem and Bounds on Entangled Multi-prover Games , 2008, 2008 23rd Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity.

[57]  Andrew Chi-Chih Yao,et al.  Self testing quantum apparatus , 2004, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[58]  Paul Skrzypczyk,et al.  Optimal randomness certification in the quantum steering and prepare-and-measure scenarios , 2015, 1504.08302.

[59]  R. Jozsa Fidelity for Mixed Quantum States , 1994 .