Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison

In developing open data policies, governments aim to stimulate and guide the publication of government data and to gain advantages from its use. Currently there is a multiplicity of open data policies at various levels of government, whereas very little systematic and structured research has been done on the issues that are covered by open data policies, their intent and actual impact. Furthermore, no suitable framework for comparing open data policies is available, as open data is a recent phenomenon and is thus in an early stage of development. In order to help bring about a better understanding of the common and differentiating elements in the policies and to identify the factors affecting the variation in policies, this paper develops a framework for comparing open data policies. The framework includes the factors of environment and context, policy content, performance indicators and public values. Using this framework, seven Dutch governmental policies at different government levels are compared. The comparison shows both similarities and differences among open data policies, providing opportunities to learn from each other’s policies. The findings suggest that current policies are rather inward looking, open data policies can be improved by collaborating with other organizations, focusing on the impact of the policy, stimulating the use of open data and looking at the need to create a culture in which publicizing data is incorporated in daily working processes. The findings could contribute to the development of new open data policies and the improvement of existing open data policies.

[1]  Charles E. Lindblom,et al.  The Policy-Making Process , 1968 .

[2]  John W. Kingdon Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[3]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  A comparison of open data policies and their implementation in two Dutch ministries , 2012, dg.o '12.

[4]  J. A. de Bruijn,et al.  Process management , 2002 .

[5]  Anthony M. Cresswell,et al.  Open government and e-government: Democratic challenges from a public value perspective , 2012, Inf. Polity.

[6]  C. Lindblom THE SCIENCE OF MUDDLING THROUGH , 1959 .

[7]  Thomas A. Birkland,et al.  An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts and Models of Public Policy Making , 2001 .

[8]  H. Ono,et al.  Digital inequality: A five country comparison using microdata ☆ , 2007 .

[9]  Nancy Routzouni,et al.  Open Data Policy , 2015 .

[10]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Issues and Guiding Principles for Opening Governmental Judicial Research Data , 2012, International Conference on Electronic Government.

[11]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[12]  Natalie Helbig,et al.  Information Strategies for Open Government: Challenges and Prospects for Deriving Public Value from Government Transparency , 2010, EGOV.

[13]  N. Huijboom,et al.  Open data: An International comparison of strategies , 2011 .

[14]  Sharon S. Dawes,et al.  Stewardship and usefulness: Policy principles for information-based transparency , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[15]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[16]  Maria Teresa Borzacchiello,et al.  The impact on innovation of open access to spatial environmental information: a research strategy , 2012, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[17]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  The potential of metadata for linked open data and its value for users and publishers , 2012 .

[18]  Joseph Stewart,et al.  Public Policy: An Evolutionary Approach , 1996 .

[19]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[20]  Lauri Frank,et al.  Does strategy matter? A comparison of broadband rollout policies in Finland and Sweden , 2008 .

[21]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  From policy implementation to business process management: Principles for creating flexibility and agility , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[22]  Harold C. Relyea,et al.  Federal government information policy and public policy analysis: A brief overview , 2008 .

[23]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government , 2012, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[24]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Access perspectives and design values in government social media usage , 2012, dg.o '12.

[25]  Katleen Janssen,et al.  The influence of the PSI directive on open government data: An overview of recent developments , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[26]  Geert Bouckaert,et al.  Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis , 2004 .

[27]  Anthony M. Cresswell,et al.  Designing electronic government information access programs: a holistic approach , 2004, Gov. Inf. Q..

[28]  K. Guldbrandsson,et al.  An exploration of the theoretical concepts policy windows and policy entrepreneurs at the Swedish public health arena. , 2009, Health promotion international.

[29]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Environment and Policy Factors Shaping Global E-Commerce Diffusion: A Cross-Country Comparison , 2003, Inf. Soc..

[30]  John Carlo Bertot,et al.  Measurement of Open Government: Metrics and Process , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[31]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Information policy, information access, and democratic participation: The national and international implications of the Bush administration's information politics , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[32]  William N. Dunn,et al.  Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction , 1993 .

[33]  Patrice McDermott,et al.  Building open government , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[34]  Kenneth B. Allen Access to Government Information. , 1992 .

[35]  G. Hofstede Culture′s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations , 2001 .

[36]  J. E. Anderson Public Policymaking: An Introduction , 1975 .