AIS Electronic Library (AISeL)

Throughout the social sciences, theorists have grappled with the problem of interdependence; what is the connection between the social world of individuals, groups and their interactions, and that of complex organizations, institutions, and social structures? This problem is still being investigated in sociology, where is it called by some the “micro-macro” problem and by others problem of the relationship between agency and structure. What ever it is called, the problem of interdependence is a serious theoretical challenge. This paper argues that as an unintended consequence of the social turn in information systems research, the problem can be expected to arise and without useful conceptual tools, much intellectual capital will be spent thinking it through. It offers a concept from social informatics Kling et al.’s (2003) “sociotechnical interaction network” (STIN), as a way to resolve the problem by offering a link between the micro order of information and communication technology use and the larger macro order of organizations and institutions. Extended by incorporating insights from Dourish’s (2004) interactional view of context and Scheff’s (2005) interpretation of Goffman’s concept of frames, STIN is useful for providing a connection between the macro and micro orders.

[1]  Andrew Clement,et al.  Collaboration and Conflict in the Development of a Computerized Dispatch Facility , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[2]  Thomas J. Scheff,et al.  The Structure of Context: Deciphering Frame Analysis * , 2005 .

[3]  Jeffrey C. Alexander,et al.  From Reduction to Linkage: The long View of the Micro-Macro Debate , 1987 .

[4]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations , 2011 .

[5]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Review of: Kling, R., Rosenbaum, H. & Sawyer, S. Understanding and communicating social informatics: a framework for studying and teaching the human contexts of information and communication technologies. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc., 2005 , 2006, Information Research.

[6]  Rob Kling,et al.  Scientific Collaboratories as Socio-Technical Interaction Networks: A Theoretical Approach , 2000, ArXiv.

[7]  T. Berard Rethinking Practices and Structures , 2005 .

[8]  Peter Hedström,et al.  Experimental Macro Sociology: Predicting the Next Best Seller , 2006, Science.

[9]  Howard Rosenbaum,et al.  Socio-Technical interaction networks as a tool for understanding digital libraries , 2004, ASIST.

[10]  Rob Kling,et al.  The Web of Computing: Computer Technology as Social Organization , 1982, Adv. Comput..

[11]  R. Kling Computerization and Social Transformations , 1991 .

[12]  H. Rosenbaum Context matters: Towards a concept of the organizational information environment , 1999 .

[13]  Rob Kling,et al.  Reconceptualizing Users as Social Actors in Information Systems Research , 2003, MIS Q..

[14]  Rich Gazan,et al.  Understanding and communicating social informatics: A framework for studying and teaching the human contexts of information and communication technologies , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[15]  Paul Dourish,et al.  What we talk about when we talk about context , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[16]  Jonny Holmström,et al.  Understanding IT’s organizational consequences: An actor network theory approach , 2005 .

[17]  R. Keith Sawyer,et al.  Artificial Societies , 2003 .

[18]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[19]  Walt Scacchi,et al.  Socio-Technical Interaction Networks in Free/Open Source Software Development Processes , 2005 .

[20]  Kristin R. Eschenfelder,et al.  Socio-technical networks of large, post-implementation Web information systems: tracing effects and influences , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[21]  S. Barley Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[22]  Rob Kling,et al.  a Bit More to It: Scholarly Communication Forums as Socio-technical Interaction Networks , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  S. Barab,et al.  Designing and building an on-line community: The struggle to support sociability in the inquiry learning forum , 2001 .

[24]  Rob Kling,et al.  The organizational context of user-centered software designs* , 1977 .

[25]  Research on Social Interaction and the Micro-Macro Issue , 1999 .

[26]  R. Baskerville,et al.  Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology , 2013, IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing.