Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems: Technology, Planning, and Operations

ABSTRACT Carsharing systems are an alternative to private transportation whereby a person may use an automobile without having to own the vehicle. The classical systems in Europe are organized in stations scattered around the city where a person may pick-up a vehicle and afterwards return it to the same station (round-trip). Allowing a person to drop-off the vehicle at any station, called one-way system, poses a significant logistics problem because it creates a significant stock imbalance at the stations, which means that there will be times when users will not have a vehicle available for their trip. Previous mathematical programming formulations have tried to overcome this limitation by optimizing trip selection and station location in a city in order to capture the best trips for balancing the system. But there was one main limitation: the users were assumed to be inflexible with respect to their choice of a station, and held to use only the one closest to their origin and destination. If the user is willing to use the second or even the third closest station he could benefit from using real-time information on vehicle stocks at each station and be able to select the one with available capacity. In this paper we extend a previous model for trip selection and station location that takes that aspect into account by considering more vehicle pick-up and drop-off station options and then apply it to a trip Origin-Destination matrix from the Lisbon region in Portugal. Through the extended formulation we were able to conclude that user flexibility allied with having information on vehicle stocks increases the profit of the company as people will go directly to a station with a vehicle available thus making the use of the fleet more efficient. Observing the size of the stations resulting from the model we also concluded that the effect of information is enhanced by large carsharing systems consisting of many small stations.

[1]  Felix Caicedo Real-time parking information management to reduce search time, vehicle displacement and emissions , 2010 .

[2]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Estimation of Carsharing Demand Using an Activity-Based Microsimulation Approach: Model Discussion and Some Results , 2013 .

[3]  Fang Zhao,et al.  A multi-periodic optimization formulation for bike planning and bike utilization , 2012 .

[4]  Randy B Machemehl,et al.  Carsharing: Dynamic Decision-Making Problem for Vehicle Allocation , 2008 .

[5]  E. Molin,et al.  Travel information as an instrument to change car- drivers' travel choices: a literature review , 2006 .

[6]  Ta-Hui Yang,et al.  Strategic design of public bicycle sharing systems with service level constraints , 2011 .

[7]  Qiang Meng,et al.  A decision support system for vehicle relocation operations in carsharing systems , 2009 .

[8]  Marcus P. Enoch,et al.  A worldwide review of support mechanisms for car clubs , 2006 .

[9]  Erik T. Verhoef,et al.  A revealed-preference study of behavioural impacts of real-time traffic information , 2013 .

[10]  Catherine Morency,et al.  How Carsharing Affects the Travel Behavior of Households: A Case Study of Montréal, Canada , 2013 .

[11]  Ueli Haefeli,et al.  Evaluation Car-Sharing , 2006 .

[12]  Robert Cervero,et al.  City CarShare: First-Year Travel Demand Impacts , 2003 .

[13]  Susan Shaheen,et al.  Shared-Use Vehicle Systems: Framework for Classifying Carsharing, Station Cars, and Combined Approaches , 2002 .

[14]  Matthew Barth,et al.  Carsharing and Station Cars in Asia: An Overview of Japan and Singapore , 2005 .

[15]  Adam Millard-Ball,et al.  Who Is Attracted to Carsharing , 2006 .

[16]  Elliot W. Martin,et al.  Impact of Carsharing on Household Vehicle Holdings , 2010 .

[17]  Alan Borning,et al.  Where Is My Bus? Impact of mobile real-time information on the perceived and actual wait time of transit riders , 2011 .

[18]  Clayton Lane,et al.  PhillyCarShare : First-year social and mobility impacts of carsharing in philadelphia, pennsylvania , 2005 .

[19]  Ryuichi Kitamura,et al.  The Impact of Advanced Transit Information on Commuters' mode Changing , 1996, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[20]  John Byrne,et al.  Assessing the Potential Extent of Carsharing: A New Method and Its Implications , 2005 .

[21]  Caspar G. Chorus,et al.  The Value of Travel Information: A Search-Theoretic Approach , 2010, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[22]  Susan Shaheen,et al.  Carsharing and Partnership Management: An International Perspective , 1999 .

[23]  Tomer Toledo,et al.  Evaluation of the Potential Benefits of Advanced Traveler Information Systems , 2006, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[24]  S. Shaheen,et al.  Personal vehicle sharing services in North America , 2012 .

[25]  Todd Litman,et al.  Evaluating Carsharing Benefits , 2000 .

[26]  Susan Shaheen,et al.  Carsharing in North America , 2005 .

[27]  R. Hampshire,et al.  Peer-to-Peer Carsharing , 2011 .

[28]  Lei Tang,et al.  Ridership effects of real-time bus information system: A case study in the City of Chicago , 2012 .

[29]  Glenn Lyons,et al.  The value of integrated multimodal traveller information and its potential contribution to modal change , 2003 .

[30]  Amelia C. Regan,et al.  IMPACTS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ON PERSONAL TRAVEL AND COMMERCIAL VEHICLE OPERATIONS : RESEARCH CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES , 2000 .

[31]  J. Polak,et al.  Effect of parking information on travelers' knowledge and behavior , 1993 .

[32]  Adam Millard-Ball,et al.  Where Does Carsharing Work? , 2007 .

[33]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  The Desired Quality of Integrated Multimodal Travel Information in Public Transport: Customer Needs for Time and Effort Savings , 2007 .

[34]  Susan Shaheen,et al.  Growth in Worldwide Carsharing , 2007 .

[35]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Effects of information in road transport networks with recurrent congestion , 1995 .