E-Government and Public Financial Reporting

Technology has changed the way public organizations relate to the public. Government's use of the Internet and other associated technologies, known as e-government, could become the instrument that makes regular timely information on public finances more forthcoming. New technologies can improve government responsiveness and empower individual citizens. By making government financial information available, the public could continuously assess a government agency through everyday interaction. The financial accountability of government and its response to public demands for information and services are thus a contribution to government openness. It is therefore relevant to determine whether public organizations are also becoming more aware of the importance of placing financial information on their Web sites to help in decision-making processes. This article focuses on the e-democracy process, specifically the transparency of government information, by analyzing governmental financial disclosures on the Web as a tool for the public to assess its financial accountability. To this end, an empirical study was carried out on regional governments in Spain.

[1]  Chaomeng James Huang,et al.  Managing WWW in public administration: Uses and misuses☆ , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[2]  Mohamed Charih,et al.  Government On-Line in the Federal Government of Canada: the Organizational Issues , 2004 .

[3]  L. Torres,et al.  E-Governance Developments in European Union Cities: Reshaping Government’s Relationship with Citizens , 2006 .

[4]  Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar,et al.  Citizens' access to on-line governmental financial information: Practices in the European Union countries , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[5]  Richard W. Davis The Web of Politics: The Internet's Impact on the American Political System , 1999 .

[6]  Xiaohu Wang,et al.  Assessing Administrative Accountability , 2002 .

[7]  Anne Daly,et al.  Accessing e-government: challenges for citizens and organizations , 2005 .

[8]  C. Weber,et al.  A survey on the use of the Internet for investor relations in the USA, the UK and Germany , 1999 .

[9]  H. Wang,et al.  Embedding e-finance in e-government: a new e-government framework , 2004, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[10]  David C. G. Brown,et al.  Electronic government and public administration , 2005 .

[11]  Kelly D. Edmiston State And Local E-Government , 2003 .

[12]  Terry D. Warfield,et al.  Corporate Reporting on the Internet , 1999 .

[13]  Julie King,et al.  Democracy in the Information Age , 2006 .

[14]  Christopher Weare,et al.  Electronic Democracy and the Diffusion of Municipal Web Pages in California , 1999 .

[15]  Whasun Jho,et al.  Challenges for e-governance: protests from civil society on the protection of privacy in e-government in Korea , 2005 .

[16]  Robbin Lee Zeff,et al.  Advertising on the Internet , 1997 .

[17]  H. Miser The Environment for Effective Operations and Systems Research , 1963 .

[18]  Genie N. L. Stowers,et al.  Becoming cyberactive: State and local governments on the World Wide Web , 1999, Gov. Inf. Q..

[19]  H. Rainey,et al.  Goal Ambiguity in U.S. Federal Agencies , 2005 .

[20]  Kartik Raman,et al.  The housing value-relevance of governmental accounting information 1 Authors' names are in alphabeti , 1998 .

[21]  Bruce Bimber Information and Political Engagement in America: The Search for Effects of Information Technology at the Individual Level , 2001 .

[22]  J. C. Thomas,et al.  E-Democracy, E-Commerce, and E-Research , 2005 .

[23]  Kristin R. Eschenfelder,et al.  Assessing U.S. federal government websites , 1997 .

[24]  M. J. Moon,et al.  Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government , 2004 .

[25]  Pontus Hedlin,et al.  The Internet as a vehicle for investor relations: the Swedish case , 1999 .

[26]  Ignace Snellen,et al.  Electronic Governance: Implications for Citizens, Politicians and Public Servants , 2002 .

[27]  J. C. Thomas,et al.  The New Face of Government: Citizen-Initiated Contacts in the Era of E-Government , 2003 .

[28]  C. May,et al.  Interaction between States and Citizens in the Age of the Internet: “e-Government” in the United States, Britain, and the European Union , 2003 .

[29]  Priscilla M. Regan,et al.  Learning to Govern Online , 2002 .

[30]  C. Weare,et al.  Designing Web Technologies for Local Governance Reform: Good Management or Good Democracy? , 2000 .

[31]  S. Borins,et al.  On the Frontiers of Electronic Governance: A Report on the United States and Canada , 2002 .

[32]  Michael R. Ward The Effect of the Internet on Political Institutions , 1996 .

[33]  F. Christopher Arterton,et al.  Teledemocracy: Can Technology Protect Democracy? F. Christopher Arterton. 1987. Sage, Newbury Park, CA. 222 pages. Index. ISBN: 0-8039-2872-6 , 1988 .

[34]  Oriol Amat,et al.  External reporting of accounting and financial information via the Internet in Spain , 1999 .

[35]  C. Demchak,et al.  Democracy and Bureaucracy in the Age of the Web , 2002 .

[36]  Jamal Ameen,et al.  Financial reporting by Malaysian local authorities , 1999 .

[37]  The future of e-Democracy. The 50 year plan , 2004 .

[38]  Camilla Stivers,et al.  Government Is Us: Public Administration in an Anti-Government Era , 1998 .

[39]  Vernon J. Richardson,et al.  The presentation of financial information at corporate Web sites , 2001, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[40]  M. J. Moon The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? , 2002 .

[41]  Shibahashi Masaaki Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information , 1986 .