Anthropometry of the Normal Human Auricle: A Study of Adult Indian Men

To treat auricular deformities or to perform facial rejuvenation, a plastic surgeon requires normative data for auricular dimensions. The metric standards vary in various ethnic groups, and such data are especially scarce from in India. This study aimed to provide anthropometric information about the normal dimensions of the adult male auricle in central India. A cross-sectional study was undertaken in central India with 415 males categorized in five age groups. Six linear dimensions including the length and width of the auricle, lobule, and concha and the heights of the auricular protrusion at the superaurale and tragal levels were measured. Auricular, lobular, and conchal indices were calculated. The inclination of the auricle relative to its vertical axis was measured. Descriptions of various auricle parts including its shape, preauricular area, form of the helical fold, lobular shape, size, and type of attachment to the cheek were recorded. Almost all the linear measurements showed a steady increase in size with age. The dimensions of the lobule were dependent on its shape and attachment to the cheek. The mean lobular and auricular indices were found to decrease with increasing age, indicating more elongation than widening of the structures. On the average, bilateral asymmetry was observed in all measurements, although only auricular length, width, and conchal length in a few age groups were found to be statistically significant. The frequency distribution of forms of various auricular features is presented. The human ear continues to grow throughout life. The lobule contributes the most to the overall elongation of the auricle. This study furnishes the first set of metric data of auricular dimensions for normal Indian males 18 to 70 years of age. In comparison with other ethnic groups, Indian males seem to have the smallest auricular and lobular lengths, although their respective widths are comparable with those of others.

[1]  L. Rubin,et al.  AN ANATOMIC APPROACH TO THE OBTRUSIVE EAR , 1962, Plastic and reconstructive surgery and the transplantation bulletin.

[2]  E. Zook,et al.  Incidence of Earlobe Ptosis and Pseudoptosis in Patients Seeking Facial Rejuvenation Surgery and Effects of Aging , 2004, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[3]  Jagruti Patel,et al.  A morphometric study of the external ear: age- and sex-related differences. , 2003, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  Orhan Ozturan,et al.  Anthropometric growth study of normal human auricle. , 2003, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[5]  J. Davis Prominent ears. , 1978, Clinics in Plastic Surgery.

[6]  L. Farkas Ear morphology in treacher collins', apert's, and crouzon's syndromes , 1978, Archives of oto-rhino-laryngology.

[7]  C Sforza,et al.  Morphometry of the normal human ear: a cross-sectional study from adolescence to mid-adulthood. , 1999, Journal of craniofacial genetics and developmental biology.

[8]  L. Farkas,et al.  Anthropometry of normal and anomalous ears , 1979, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[9]  A. Kida,et al.  A Morphological Study of Age Changes in Adult Human Auricular Cartilage With Special Emphasis on Elastic Fibers , 2001, The Laryngoscope.

[10]  E. Beahm,et al.  Auricular reconstruction for microtia: part I. Anatomy, embryology, and clinical evaluation. , 2002, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[11]  L. Farkas,et al.  Anthropometric growth study of the ear. , 1992, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[12]  W. K. Lindsay,et al.  Ear morphology in cleft lip and palate anomaly , 1973, Archives of oto-rhino-laryngology.

[13]  C. Yakıncı,et al.  Anthropometric growth study of auricle of healthy preterm and term newborns. , 2006, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[14]  P. Lakshminarayana,et al.  Anthropometry for syndromology , 1991, Indian journal of pediatrics.

[15]  S. Green,et al.  Framework Growth after Reconstruction for Microtia: Is It Real and What Are the Implications? , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[16]  R. Azaria,et al.  Morphometry of the Adult Human Earlobe: A Study of 547 Subjects and Clinical Application , 2003, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[17]  J A Heathcote,et al.  Why do old men have big ears? , 1995, BMJ.

[18]  C. Barut,et al.  Anthropometric Measurements of the External Ear in a Group of Turkish Primary School Students , 2006, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[19]  U. Bite Plastic Surgery. Indications, Operations, and Outcomes. , 2001 .

[20]  M. Bozkır,et al.  Morphometry of the External Ear in Our Adult Population , 2006, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[21]  Emanuela Gualdi,et al.  Longitudinal study of anthropometric changes with aging in an urban Italian population , 1998 .