The management of mechanical integrity inspections at small-sized "Seveso" facilities

Abstract The mechanical integrity (MI) of equipment has been controlled at all industrial facilities for many decades. Control methods and intervals are regulated by laws or codes and best practices. In European countries, the legislations implementing the Seveso Directives on the control of major accident hazards require the owner of establishments where hazardous chemicals are handled, to implement a safety management system (SMS). MI controls should be an integral part of the SMS. At large establishments this goal is achieved by adopting the RBI method, but in small-sized establishments with a limited budget and scanty personnel, a heuristic approach is more suitable. This paper demonstrates the feasibility and advantages of integrating SMS and MI by means of a simple method that includes a few basic concepts of RBI without additional costs for operator. This method, supported by a software tool, is resilient as it functions effectively in spite of eventual budget reductions and personnel turnover. The results of MI controls can also be exploited to monitor equipment condition and demonstrate the adequacy of technical systems to the Competent Authorities (CA). Furthermore, the SMS can “capture” knowledge resulting from MI experience and exploit it for a better understanding of risk.

[1]  P M Hagemeijer,et al.  A methodology for risk-based inspection of pressurized systems , 1998 .

[2]  Yunmin Kim,et al.  Application of a Knowledge-Based Information System for Life Extension of Steel Making Plant , 2004 .

[3]  Maarten-Jan Kallen,et al.  Optimal maintenance decisions under imperfect inspection , 2005, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  P Vincze Application of the IAEA Safety Standards on Management System or Facilities and Activities , 2006 .

[5]  Ryan Sitton Integration of RBI with an Inspection Data Management System , 2006 .

[6]  B Basso,et al.  Reviewing the safety management system by incident investigation and performance indicators , 2004 .

[7]  Ramesh J. Patel Risk Based Inspection , 2005 .

[8]  Chris Ablitt,et al.  Experiences in Implementing Risk-Based Inspection , 2006 .

[9]  Mats Jackson,et al.  A survey on condition monitoring systems in industry , 2004 .

[10]  Julian B. Speck,et al.  Industry Survey of Risk-Based Life Management Practices , 2002 .

[11]  Aleksandar Jovanovic,et al.  RIMAP demonstration project. Risk-based life management of piping system in power plant Heilbronn , 2004 .

[12]  Maureen Wood THE MUTUAL JOINT VISIT PROGRAMME ON INSPECTIONS UNDER SEVESO II: EXCHANGING LESSONS LEARNED ON INSPECTION BEST PRACTICES , 2004 .

[13]  Fred Nilsson Risk-based approach to plant life management , 2003 .

[14]  Terje Aven,et al.  Risk based maintenance optimization: foundational issues , 2000, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Risk‐based maintenance (RBM): A new approach for process plant inspection and maintenance , 2004 .

[16]  A. Culyer,et al.  The effectiveness of occupational health and safety management system interventions: A systematic review , 2007 .