Quantitative Examination of Tissue Concentration Profiles Associated with Microdialysis

Abstract: Spatial solute concentration profiles resulting from in vivo microdialysis were measured in rat caudate‐putamen by quantitative autoradiography. Radiolabeled sucrose was included in the dialysate, and the tissue concentration profile measured after infusions of 14 min and 61.5 min in an acute preparation. In addition, the changes in sucrose extraction fraction over time were followed in vivo and in a simple in vitro system consisting of 0.5% agarose. These experimental results were then compared with mathematical simulations of microdialysis in vitro and in vivo. Simulations of in vitro microdialysis agreed well with experimental results. In vivo, the autoradiograms of the tissue concentration profiles showed clear evidence of substantial differences between 14 and 61.5 min, even though the change in extraction fraction was relatively small over that period. Comparison with simulated results showed that the model substantially underpre‐dicted the observed extraction fraction and overall amount of sucrose in the tissue. A sensitivity analysis of the various model parameters suggested a tissue extracellular volume fraction of approximately 40% following probe implantation. We conclude that the injury from probe insertion initially causes disruption of the blood‐brain barrier in the vicinity of the probe, and this disruption leads to an influx of water and plasma constituents, causing a vasogenic edema.

[1]  J. LaManna Brain Fluids and Metabolism , 1991, Neurology.

[2]  W. D. Halliburton,et al.  Handbook of Physiology , 1870, Edinburgh Medical Journal.

[3]  J. Hsiao,et al.  Chapter 3 – Quantitative microdialysis , 1991 .

[4]  P F Morrison,et al.  Effects of Different Semipermeable Membranes on In Vitro and In Vivo Performance of Microdialysis Probes , 1990, Journal of neurochemistry.

[5]  P. Jansson,et al.  A microdialysis method allowing characterization of intercellular water space in humans. , 1987, The American journal of physiology.

[6]  Arthur C. Guyton,et al.  Handbook of Physiology—The Cardiovascular System , 1985 .

[7]  C S Patlak,et al.  Measurements of dog blood-brain transfer constants by ventriculocisternal perfusion. , 1975, The American journal of physiology.

[8]  H. Benveniste Brain Microdialysis , 1989, Journal of neurochemistry.

[9]  P F Morrison,et al.  Quantitative Microdialysis: Analysis of Transients and Application to Pharmacokinetics in Brain , 1991, Journal of neurochemistry.

[10]  H. Benveniste,et al.  Determination of Brain Interstitial Concentrations by Microdialysis , 1989, Journal of neurochemistry.

[11]  J. Pickard Physiology and Pathophysiology of the Cerebrospinal Fluid , 1988 .

[12]  K. Pettigrew,et al.  Quantitative aspects of reversible osmotic opening of the blood-brain barrier. , 1980, The American journal of physiology.

[13]  R. Schwartzman,et al.  Flow dependent changes in the effective surface area of microdialysis probes. , 1988, Life sciences.

[14]  A. Hamberger,et al.  Mass transfer in brain dialysis devices—a new method for the estimation of extracellular amino acids concentration , 1985, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[15]  C S Patlak,et al.  Sucrose and inulin space measurements of cerebral cortex in four mammalian species. , 1970, The American journal of physiology.

[16]  N. Lindefors,et al.  Intracerebral microdialysis: II. Mathematical studies of diffusion kinetics. , 1989, Journal of pharmacological methods.

[17]  P F Morrison,et al.  Steady-state theory for quantitative microdialysis of solutes and water in vivo and in vitro. , 1990, Life sciences.