Family therapy and qualitative research

Qualitative research is becoming accepted by the scientific community as a viable way to explore and understand socialscience phenomena. The purpose of this paper is to describe the essential features of the qualitative research paradigm and to encourage further development of that paradigm in the field of family therapy. First, typical characteristics of qualitative research designs are delineated; these characteristics are illustrated with two extended examples from the qualitative research literature in the field of education. Next, possible applications of the qualitative paradigm to research issues in the field of family therapy are discussed. Finally, potential pitfalls that could inhibit the development of qualitative family therapy research are examined. It is hoped that this paper will serve as a stimulus for the development of qualititative research in the field of family therapy.

[1]  Yvonna S. Lincoln,et al.  Judging the quality of case study reports , 1990 .

[2]  J. Feldhusen,et al.  Conducting Research and Evaluation in Gifted Education: A Handbook of Methods and Applications , 1991 .

[3]  L. Greenberg,et al.  INTEGRATING PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE: MODELING THE CHANGE PROCESS , 1988 .

[4]  A. Heath,et al.  Toward the Identification of Variables for Evaluating Family Therapy Workshops. , 1988 .

[5]  L. Greenberg.  Resolving splits: Use of the two chair technique. , 1979 .

[6]  J. Smith.  Quantitative Versus Qualitative Research: An Attempt to Clarify the Issue , 1983 .

[7]  W. Firestone.  Meaning in Method: The Rhetoric of Quantitative and Qualitative Research , 1987 .

[8]  B. Keeney,et al.  Implications of Cybernetic Epistemology for Clinical Research: A Reply to Howard , 1985 .

[9]  L. Greenberg.  The intensive analysis of recurring events from the practice of Gestalt therapy. , 1980 .

[10]  Sandra Hollingsworth,et al.  Prior Beliefs and Cognitive Change in Learning to Teach , 1989 .

[11]  Neal A. Newfield,et al.  A Mini Ethnography of the Family Therapy of Adolescent Drug Abuse , 1990 .

[12]  Ralph LaRossa,et al.  On Qualitative Family Research , 1985 .

[13]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  New methods for qualitative data collection and analysis: vignettes and pre‐structured cases , 1990 .

[14]  L. Shepard,et al.  Kindergarten Readiness and Retention: A Qualitative Study of Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices , 1988 .

[15]  D. Sprenkle,et al.  Ecosystemic epistemology: critical implications for the aesthetics and pragmatics of family therapy. , 1982, Family process.

[16]  Evelyn Jacob,et al.  Clarifying Qualitative Research: A Focus on Traditions , 1988 .

[17]  Claude N. Goldenberg.  Parents’ Effects on Academic Grouping for Reading: Three Case Studies , 1989 .

[18]  J. Schwartzman.  Family theory and the scientific method. , 1984, Family process.

[19]  L. Wynne.  FAMILY RESEARCH AND FAMILY THERAPY: A REUNION?* , 1983 .

[20]  C. Anderson.  THE ALL‐TOO‐SHORT TRIP FROM POSITIVE TO NEGATIVE CONNOTATION , 1986 .

[21]  David G. O'Brien,et al.  Preservice Teachers' Perspectives on why Every Teacher is not a Teacher of Reading: A Qualitative Analysis , 1990 .

[22]  P. Shannon.  Paradigmatic Diversity within the Reading Research Community , 1989 .

[23]  John K. Smith,et al.  Closing Down the Conversation: The End of the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate Among Educational Inquirers , 1986 .

[24]  Evaluating the effectiveness of family therapies: an integrative review and analysis. , 1987 .

[25]  A. Mahrer.  Discovery-oriented psychotherapy research. Rationale, aims, and methods. , 1988, The American psychologist.

[26]  S. B. Levenberg,et al.  Multi-modal behavioral approach to the treatment and management of essential hypertension. , 1979 .

[27]  L. Locke,et al.  Qualitative research as a form of scientific inquiry in sport and physical education. , 1989, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[28]  I. Eisler,et al.  WHAT'S HAPPENED TO FAMILY INTERACTION RESEARCH? AN HISTORICAL ACCOUNT AND A FAMILY SYSTEMS VIEWPOINT , 1988 .

[29]  G. Burlingame,et al.  Systems of family treatment: substance or semantics? , 1988, Annual review of psychology.

[30]  L. T. Hoshmand.  Alternate Research Paradigms , 1989 .

[31]  A. Peshkin.  In Search of Subjectivity—One's Own , 1988 .

[32]  D. Royce Sadler,et al.  Intuitive Data Processing as a Potential Source of Bias in Naturalistic Evaluations , 1981 .

[33]  P. Loader,et al.  THE FAMILY TASK INTERVIEW: A TOOL FOR CLINICAL RESEARCH IN FAMILY INTERACTION , 1988 .

[34]  A. Gurman,et al.  Technolatry, methodolatry, and the results of family therapy. , 1978, Family process.

[35]  A. Gurman.  FAMILY THERAPY RESEARCH AND THE “NEW EPISTEMOLOGY”* , 1983 .

[36]  E. Guba,et al.  Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .

[37]  K. Howe.  Against the Quantitative-Qualitative Incompatibility Thesis or Dogmas Die Hard , 1988 .

[38]  Evelyn Jacob,et al.  Qualitative Research Traditions: A Review , 1987 .

[39]  Evelyn Jacob,et al.  Qualitative Research: A Defense of Traditions , 1989 .

[40]  Deborah R. Dillon.  Showing Them That I Want Them to Learn and That I Care About Who They Are: A Microethnography of the Social Organization of a Secondary Low-Track English-Reading Classroom , 1989 .

[41]  The self‐reflexive mind: the life's work of Gregory Bateson , 1988 .

[42]  J. Alexander.  Defensive and supportive communications in normal and deviant families. , 1973, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[43]  R. Gelles,et al.  Ethical dilemmas in qualitative family research. , 1981, Journal of marriage and the family.

[44]  R. W. Grove,et al.  An analysis of the constant comparative method , 1988 .

[45]  N. Jacobson,et al.  COMPONENT ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIORAL MARITAL THERAPY: 2-YEAR FOLLOW-UP AND PREDICTION OF RELAPSE , 1987 .

[46]  Bruce P. Kuehl,et al.  A client-based description of family therapy. , 1990 .

[47]  Morris Taggart,et al.  THE FEMINIST CRITIQUE IN EPISTEMOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE: QUESTIONS OF CONTEXT IN FAMILY THERAPY , 1985 .

[48]  M. Selvini.  TOWARDS A GENERAL MODEL OF PSYCHOTIC FAMILY GAMES , 1986 .

[49]  C. Shields.  CRITIQUING THE NEW EPISTEMOLOGIES: TOWARDMINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR A SCIENTIFIC THEORY OF FAMILY THERAPY* , 1986 .