rban solid waste plant treatment in Brazil : Is there a net emergy yield on the ecovered materials ?

Disposal alternatives of urban solid waste (USW) are being considered one of the main topics on the political agenda worldwide due to high concerns related to economic, social and environmental issues. In São Paulo Municipality, Brazil, the Sorting and Composting Waste Treatment Plant (SCWTP) is suggested as an appropriated way to manage the 14,000 Mg of USW generated daily by 11 million inhabitants in 2010. The argument is that recovering materials from USW is aligned to sustainable development concept, however there is a lack of a deeper sustainability assessment, raising doubts about the benefits received by society on recovering materials. In this sense, emergy accounting (spelled with “m”) suggests to be a good alternative when assessing these benefits under a global scale. The aim of this work is to assess the São Paulo’s SCWTP using Emergy Accounting. Results shown that currently there is an emergy balance by sorting paper (ratio of recovered by invested emergy of 0.97), and an emergy benefit for iron&steel (2.65), plastic (2.91) and compost (2.57). However, there is an emergy cost by sorting glass (0.23) and aluminum (0.20). A plausible scenario by increasing the recovering efficiency of glass from current 11.6% to 52.9%, and aluminum from 4.7% to 24.7% (both in wet weight), results in an emergy benefit for all materials. The Net Emergy Benefit indicates the SCWTP as a better alternative when the total net emergy return to society is the focus, because while it makes available about 3.13E+14 seJ/Mg of treated USW, the landfills have an average emergy deficit of −3.39E+13 seJ, indicating that landfill uses more emergy than makes available. Results indicates that SCWTP must receive political incentives due to its good emergy performance and others social beneficial aspects, however, aiming to improve the overall performance, each individual citizen must collaborate with waste reduction and the separation of non-organic material from the organic ones at origin.

[1]  Cecília M.V.B. Almeida,et al.  An emergy-based evaluation of a reverse logistics network for steel recycling , 2013 .

[2]  B. Giannetti,et al.  An evaluation of a MSW-to-energy system using Emergy synthesis , 2012 .

[3]  O. Le Corre,et al.  Impact of building material recycle or reuse on selected emergy ratios , 2012 .

[4]  Fang Yuan,et al.  Emergy analysis of the recycling options for construction and demolition waste. , 2011, Waste management.

[5]  Cecília M.V.B. Almeida,et al.  Emergy assessment of a coffee farm in Brazilian Cerrado considering in a broad form the environmental services, negative externalities and fair price , 2011 .

[6]  B. Rugani,et al.  Environmental performance of a XIV Century water management system: An emergy evaluation of cultural heritage , 2011 .

[7]  D. Tilley,et al.  Dynamic accounting of emergy cycling , 2011 .

[8]  O. Le Corre,et al.  Recycling flows in emergy evaluation: A mathematical paradox? , 2011 .

[9]  Tommaso Flaminio,et al.  Emergy and emergy algebra explained by means of ingenuous set theory , 2011 .

[10]  Kamal Abdel Radi Ismail,et al.  Energy and environmental potential of solid waste in Brazil , 2011 .

[11]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Assessing geobiosphere work of generating global reserves of coal, crude oil, and natural gas , 2011 .

[12]  Li Li,et al.  Emergy evaluation of the sustainability of two industrial systems based on wastes exchanges , 2010 .

[13]  R. Almond,et al.  Living Planet Report 2010: Biodiversity, biocapacity and development , 2010 .

[14]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  Assessment of a large watershed in Brazil using Emergy Evaluation and Geographical Information System , 2010 .

[15]  Silvia Bargigli,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) of waste management strategies: Landfilling, sorting plant and incineration , 2009 .

[16]  Silvia Bargigli,et al.  Life cycle assessment of urban waste management: energy performances and environmental impacts. The case of Rome, Italy. , 2008, Waste management.

[17]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  The use of emergy assessment and the Geographical Information System in the diagnosis of small family farms in Brazil , 2008 .

[18]  Nickolas J. Themelis,et al.  Methane generation in landfills , 2007 .

[19]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Energy quality, emergy, and transformity: H.T. Odum’s contributions to quantifying and understanding systems , 2004 .

[20]  Vorasun Buranakarn,et al.  Emergy indices and ratios for sustainable material cycles and recycle options , 2003 .

[21]  Simone Bastianoni,et al.  Sustainability assessment of a farm in the Chianti area (Italy) , 2001 .

[22]  Gerard P.J. Dijkema,et al.  A new paradigm for waste management , 2000 .

[23]  Mark T. Brown,et al.  Emergy-based indices and ratios to evaluate sustainability: monitoring economies and technology toward environmentally sound innovation , 1997 .

[24]  M. T Brown,et al.  Embodied energy analysis and EMERGY analysis: a comparative view , 1996 .

[25]  J. Ramírez-Hernández,et al.  Assessment of groundwater contamination by landfill leachate: a case in México. , 2008, Waste management.

[26]  Cecília M.V.B. Almeida,et al.  Emergetic ternary diagrams: five examples for application in environmental accounting for decision-making , 2007 .

[27]  N Marchettini,et al.  An environmental analysis for comparing waste management options and strategies. , 2007, Waste management.

[28]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Emergy Analysis and Environmental Accounting , 2004 .

[29]  K. Hanaki,et al.  Assessment of the environmental impact of management measures for the biodegradable fraction of municipal solid waste in São Paulo City. , 2003, Waste management.

[30]  O. E. G. B. M. D. Planejamento.  Pesquisa nacional de saneamento básico: 2000 , 2001 .

[31]  Paulo Antônio de Almeida Sinisgalli,et al.  Análise de fluxo energético: aplicação ao caso da cadeia produtiva da celulose , 1998 .