Flexibility in innovation through external learning: exploring two models for enhanced industry-university collaboration

This paper draws on extensive theoretical research and literature reviews, and presents two cases to illustrate practical applications. It addresses the problem of how learning both from extracorporate sources, like universities, as well as across internal corporate functions, like R&D and manufacturing, can enhance company flexibility and performance in innovation. This paper aims at delivering a new theoretical rationale for industry?university (I-U) learning alliances as a natural way out from the managerial problem of trying to perform both exploration and exploitation within the same company boundaries. Through our theoretical framework, the academic science domain becomes a logical partner to handle the full phase of exploration and support the process of exploitation. The presented cases of Packman and HiFiPower offer new insight into how to perform this act in practice.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[2]  Takeru Kusunoki.  The Dilemma of Technological Leadership : A Conceptual Framework , 1992 .

[3]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[4]  H. Chesbrough.  The Era of Open Innovation , 2003 .

[5]  Mei Cao,et al.  Innovation-driven learning in new product development: a conceptual model , 2004, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[6]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[7]  I. Nonaka.  Redundant, Overlapping Organization: A Japanese Approach to Managing the Innovation Process , 1990 .

[8]  A. Amin,et al.  Architectures of Knowledge: Firms, Capabilities, and Communities , 2004 .

[9]  J. Roos,et al.  Intellectual Capital: Navigating in the New Business Landscape , 1997 .

[10]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Managing innovation as a self-renewing process , 1989 .

[11]  B. Kogut,et al.  Social Capital, Structural Holes and the Formation of an Industry Network , 1997 .

[12]  C. Freeman.  Economics of Industrial Innovation , 1975 .

[13]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Industry/University Licensing: Characteristics, Concerns and Issues from the Perspective of the Buyer , 2003 .

[14]  G. O'Connor,et al.  Assessing Transition Readiness for Radical Innovation , 2002 .

[15]  Maria Nedeva,et al.  The international dimension to industry-academic links , 2003, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[16]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  Emergence of a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations , 1996 .

[17]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[18]  Sevgin Eroğlu,et al.  Book Review: The Knowledge Link: How Firms Compete through Strategic Alliances , 1993 .

[19]  Robert Kevin Grigsby.  "Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation" , 1996 .

[20]  James A. Welch,et al.  Strategic sourcing: a progressive approach to the make-or-buy decision , 1992 .

[21]  P. Lorange.  Developing learning partnerships , 1996 .

[22]  Chun Wei Choo,et al.  The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge , 2002 .

[23]  Anne P. Carter,et al.  The Economics of Technological Change , 1966 .

[24]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Time pacing: competing in markets that won't stand still. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[25]  G. Stalk,et al.  Competing on capabilities: the new rules of corporate strategy. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[26]  D. Ernst,et al.  Collaborating to compete : using strategic alliances and acquisitions in the global marketplace , 1993 .

[27]  Reginald F. O'Neill.  Theories of Knowledge , 1962 .

[28]  Sigvald Harryson,et al.  Improving R&D Performance through Networking – Lessons from Canon and Sony , 2003 .

[29]  Georg Krücken.  Mission impossible? Institutional barriers to the diffusion of the "third academic mission" at German universities , 2003, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[30]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Appropriability of innovation benefit as a predictor of the source of innovation , 1982 .

[31]  Doris Schartinger,et al.  Interactive Relations Between Universities and Firms: Empirical Evidence for Austria , 2001 .

[32]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[33]  Ilkka Tuomi,et al.  Networks of Innovation: Change and Meaning in the Age of the Internet , 2002 .

[34]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Organizational knowledge creation theory: A first comprehensive test , 1994 .

[35]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  Why Study National Systems and National Styles of Innovation , 1998 .

[36]  G. Pisano.  The governance of innovation: Vertical integration and collaborative arrangements in the biotechnology industry☆ , 1991 .

[37]  C. P. Goodman,et al.  The Tacit Dimension , 2003 .

[38]  O Xford U Niversity,et al.  Knowledge Works: Managing Intellectual Capital at Toshiba , 1998 .

[39]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  The External Control of Organizations. , 1978 .

[40]  Jordan D. Lewis.  Partnerships for Profit: Structuring and Managing Strategic Alliances , 1990 .

[41]  Roderick E. White,et al.  An Organizational Learning Framework : From Intuition to Institution Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[42]  Bruce A. Pasternack,et al.  The CENTERLESS CORPORATION: A NEW MODEL FOR TRANSFORMING YOUR ORGANIZATION FOR GROWTH AND PROSPERITY , 1998 .

[43]  R. Kanter.  The Change Masters , 1983 .

[44]  Sigvald Harryson,et al.  From experience How Canon and Sony drive product innovation through networking and application-focused R&D , 1997 .

[45]  Jörgen Hansson,et al.  Virtual organizations and beyond - discover imaginary systems , 2001, Wiley series in practical strategy.

[46]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[47]  George Jr. Stalk Hout.  Competing Against Time : How Time Based Competition Is Reshaping Global Markets , 2002 .

[48]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[49]  Clayton M. Christensen.  The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[50]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  Network Memory: The Influence of Past and Current Networks on Performance , 2004 .

[51]  James M. Hulbert,et al.  To Serve or Create? Strategic Orientations toward Customers and Innovation , 1999 .

[52]  G. Ahuja.  Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[53]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[54]  E. C. Martins,et al.  Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation , 2003 .

[55]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[56]  Gustavo Stubrich.  The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization , 1993 .

[57]  John M. Silvester,et al.  The Social Life of Information: Brown, J.S., & Duguid, P. (2000). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing. ISBN 0-87584-762-5. 320 pages , 2000, Internet High. Educ..

[58]  Daniel H. Kim.  The Link between individual and organizational learning , 1997 .

[59]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[60]  Helen Mitchell,et al.  Strategic management of interactions at the academic-industry interface , 1994 .

[61]  L. E. Nimtz.  University-Industry Partnerships: Meeting the Challenge with a High-Tech Partner. , 1996 .

[62]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[63]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[64]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[65]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[66]  Douglas Polley,et al.  Learning While Innovating , 1992 .

[67]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[68]  P. Duguid,et al.  Balancing act: how to capture knowledge without killing it. , 2000, Harvard business review.

[69]  Hiroyuki Itami.  Mobilizing invisible assets , 1987 .

[70]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Concept of “Ba”: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation , 1998 .

[71]  Peter Lorange,et al.  Building successful strategic alliances , 1992 .

[72]  R. Henderson.  The evolution of integrative capability: innovation in cardiovascular drug discovery , 1994 .

[73]  G. Krogh,et al.  An essay on corporate epistemology , 2007 .

[74]  J. Klein,et al.  Skill-Based Competition , 1991 .

[75]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[76]  U. Schmoch,et al.  Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields , 1998 .

[77]  S. Macdonald.  British Science Parks: Reflections on the Politics of High Technology , 1987 .

[78]  John W. Slocum,et al.  Unlearning the organization , 1993 .

[79]  Sigvald Harryson.  Japanese Technology and Innovation Management: From Know-How to Know-Who , 1998 .

[80]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[81]  R. Burt.  The Social Structure of Competition , 2004 .

[82]  C. Barnard.  The Functions of the Executive , 1939 .

[83]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  Inter-firm partnerships and co-operative strategies in core technologies , 1990 .

[84]  Marian Beise,et al.  Public research and industrial innovations in Germany , 1999 .

[85]  P. Lorange,et al.  Bringing the College Inside , 2005 .

[86]  T. Gonard,et al.  The process of change in relationships between public research and industry: two case studies from France , 1999 .

[87]  Graham K. Rand.  Beyond Partnership: Strategies for Innovation and Lean Supply , 1993 .

[88]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[89]  A. Moreno,et al.  Influence of support leadership and teamwork cohesion on organizational learning, innovation and performance: An empirical examination , 2005 .

[90]  David Zilberman,et al.  University Research and Offices of Technology Transfer , 2002 .

[91]  Francisco Javier Lloréns Montes,et al.  Flexibility, fit and innovative capacity: an empirical examination , 2005, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[92]  E. Mansfield,et al.  The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support , 1996 .

[93]  F. Betz.  Managing Technology: Competing Through New Ventures, Innovation, and Corporate Research , 1987 .

[94]  Andrea Piccaluga,et al.  Exploitation and diffusion of public research: the case of academic spin-off companies in Italy , 2000 .

[95]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[96]  S. Kraemer.  Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Gregory Bateson , 1993, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[97]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[98]  M. Y. Yoshino,et al.  Strategic Alliances: An Entrepreneurial Approach to Globalization , 1995 .

[99]  Sigvald J. Harryson.  Managing Know-Who Based Companies: A Multinetworked Approach to Knowledge and Innovation Management , 2000 .

[100]  G. Lakoff.  Philosophy in the flesh , 1999 .

[101]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[102]  H. Etzkowitz.  Research groups as ???quasi-firms???: the invention of the entrepreneurial university , 2003 .

[103]  Mark P. Rice,et al.  Opportunity Recognition and Breakthrough Innovation in Large Established Firms , 2001 .

[104]  Tien-Shang Lee,et al.  The effects of business operation mode on market orientation, learning orientation and innovativeness , 2005, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..