Modeling the impact of observation conditions on localization systems

In various applications, sensor fusion has demonstrated success as means to enhance a system performance in perceiving its environment. By combing observations of different sensors, the system is able to achieve improved sensing accuracy, and potentially, expanded sensing capabilities. However, the observation conditions in the surrounding of any multi-sensor system have a considerable impact on the performance of the system. This impact can be hard to mitigate if the observation conditions are stochastic in nature. Therefore, for any sensor fusion strategy to achieve reliable and robust performance it must possess a capability to assess the quality of the observation conditions in its surrounding, and ultimately, the quality of its decisions, as a function of these conditions. One typical application where the impact of the observation conditions can cause sever deterioration of the sensing performance is vehicle localization. It is typical in this application that location measurements obtained from multiple sensors (e.g., GPS, Vision, Inertial, etc.) are combined together to compute accurate vehicle location. However, such improved accuracy can only be attained under nominal observation conditions. Therefore, real-time awareness of the observation conditions around the vehicle position is pivotal for the multi-sensor system to achieve effective fusion performance. In this paper, a Markovian model is proposed to capture the impact of observation conditions on a sensor's localization performance and to consequently determine a reliability index with respect to the localization accuracy claimed by the sensor. The proposed model is implemented on two localization techniques: single-sensor localization and multi-sensor localization. A number of experiments are conducted to determine the different levels of localization accuracy that can be achieved by each technique under a wide range of observation conditions. The proposed reliability model is tested in a variety of real-life and simulated observation conditions scenarios. It is evident from the experimental results that the proposed model is able to estimate the reliability of location estimates produced by either one of the localization techniques. The paper discusses how such reliability model can benefit multi-sensor systems.

[1]  M. Jabbour,et al.  Management of Landmarks in a GIS for an Enhanced Localisation in Urban Areas , 2006, 2006 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[2]  Gaëtan Garcia,et al.  Improving the accuracy of dynamic localization systems using RTK GPS by identifying the GPS latency , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[3]  Abderrahim Benslimane Optimized Dissemination of Alarm Messages in Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks (VANET) , 2004, HSNMC.

[4]  Robert Andrew Rae,et al.  Augmenting Vehicle Localization with Visual Context , 2009 .

[5]  Otman A. Basir,et al.  Traffic pattern detection in a partially deployed vehicular Ad Hoc network of vehicles , 2009, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[6]  Azzedine Boukerche,et al.  Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks: A New Challenge for Localization-Based Systems , 2008, Comput. Commun..

[7]  Liviu Iftode,et al.  Location-Aware Services over Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks using Car-to-Car Communication , 2007, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[8]  Antonio F. Gómez-Skarmeta,et al.  High-Integrity IMM-EKF-Based Road Vehicle Navigation With Low-Cost GPS/SBAS/INS , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[9]  Otman A. Basir A Markovian model for predicting the impact of observation conditions on the reliability of sensory systems , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Innovations in Theory, Practice and Applications (Cat. No.98CH36190).

[10]  Hugh F. Durrant-Whyte,et al.  The aiding of a low-cost strapdown inertial measurement unit using vehicle model constraints for land vehicle applications , 2001, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[11]  Hugh F. Durrant-Whyte,et al.  Achieving integrity in an INS/GPS navigation loop for autonomous land vehicle applications , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[12]  H. Tijms A First Course in Stochastic Models , 2003 .

[13]  Mohinder S. Grewal,et al.  Global Positioning Systems, Inertial Navigation, and Integration , 2000 .

[14]  Otman A. Basir,et al.  Intervehicle-Communication-Assisted Localization , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[15]  Isaac Skog,et al.  In-Car Positioning and Navigation Technologies—A Survey , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[16]  Hyeongcheol Lee,et al.  Reliability Indexed Sensor Fusion and Its Application to Vehicle Velocity Estimation , 2006 .

[17]  James J. Caffery,et al.  Wireless Location in CDMA Cellular Radio Systems , 1999 .