Determination of environmental impact and optimum thickness of insulation for building walls

The optimum insulation thickness of the external walls, energy cost savings over a lifetime of 10 yr, and payback periods are calculated for the four different wall types in the city of Elazig, Turkey. The net energy cost savings is calculated by using the P1−P2 method. According to the results, the optimum insulation thickness has been obtained by using coal as the energy source and stropor as the insulating material. The results show that the optimum insulation thicknesses vary between 4.5 and 16.5 cm, energy cost savings vary between 14 and 22 $/m2, and payback periods vary between 1.5 and 2 yr depending on the wall type. The highest value of energy cost savings is reached for the Wall III, which has a composite structure called a sandwich wall. The emissions of CO2, SO2, CO, and NOx from the combustion of coal are calculated for the four different wall types. It has been determined that when the optimum insulation thickness is used for coal as an energy source in Elazig, the CO2 emission rates of fuel vary between 8.3 and 9.3 kg/m2 yr and the SO2 emission rates of fuel vary between 0.017 and 0.019 kg/m2 yr depending on the wall type. The emissions of CO and NOx are reduced by 82% by applying this optimum insulation thickness. © 2010 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 2011

[1]  Figen Balo,et al.  DETERMINATION OF THE ENERGY SAVINGS AND THE OPTIMUM INSULATION THICKNESS IN THE FOUR DIFFERENT INSULATED EXTERIOR WALLS , 2010 .

[2]  Moncef Krarti,et al.  Optimization of Korean crop storage insulation systems , 2003 .

[3]  Jan Kosny,et al.  Influence of insulation configuration on heating and cooling loads in a continuously used building , 2002 .

[4]  Kamil Kaygusuz,et al.  Environmental impacts of energy utilisation and renewable energy policies in Turkey , 2002 .

[5]  Ö. Altan Dombaycı,et al.  The environmental impact of optimum insulation thickness for external walls of buildings , 2007 .

[6]  Emin Kahya,et al.  Determination of optimum insulation thicknesses of the external walls and roof (ceiling) for Turkey's different degree-day regions , 2007 .

[7]  Ali Bolatturk,et al.  Determination of optimum insulation thickness for building walls with respect to various fuels and climate zones in Turkey , 2006 .

[8]  R. Tuğrul Oğulata,et al.  Energy sector and wind energy potential in Turkey , 2003 .

[9]  Abdullah Yildiz,et al.  ECONOMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES OF THERMAL INSULATION THICKNESS IN BUILDINGS , 2008 .

[10]  Ali Bolatturk,et al.  Optimum insulation thicknesses for building walls with respect to cooling and heating degree-hours in the warmest zone of Turkey , 2008 .

[11]  N. Kyriakis,et al.  Heating and cooling degree-hours for Athens and Thessaloniki, Greece , 2005 .

[12]  Khaled A. Al-Sallal.  Comparison between polystyrene and fiberglass roof insulation in warm and cold climates , 2003 .

[13]  Mohammed Al-Khawaja,et al.  Determination and selecting the optimum thickness of insulation for buildings in hot countries by accounting for solar radiation , 2004 .

[14]  Kemal Çomaklı,et al.  Environmental impact of thermal insulation thickness in buildings , 2004 .

[15]  Kemal Çomaklı,et al.  Optimum insulation thickness of external walls for energy saving , 2003 .

[16]  O. Kaynakli,et al.  A study on residential heating energy requirement and optimum insulation thickness , 2008 .

[17]  Figen Balo,et al.  Effect of fuel type on the optimum thickness of selected insulation materials for the four different climatic regions of Turkey , 2009 .