Ultrasound Radiation Force Modulates Ligand Availability on Targeted Contrast Agents

Radiation force produced by low-amplitude ultrasound at clinically relevant frequencies remotely translates freely flowing microbubble ultrasound contrast agents over distances up to centimeters from the luminal space to the vessel wall in order to enhance ligand-receptor contact in targeting applications. The question arises as to how the microbubble shell might be designed at the molecular level to fully take advantage of such physical forces in targeted adhesion for molecular imaging and controlled therapeutic release. Herein, we report on a novel surface architecture in which the tethered ligand is buried in a polymeric overbrush. Our results, with biotin-avidin as the model ligand-receptor pair, show that the overbrush conceals the ligand, thereby reducing immune cell binding and increasing circulation persistence. Targeted adhesion is achieved through application of ultrasound radiation force to instantly reveal the ligand within a well-defined focal zone and simultaneously bind the ligand and receptor. Our data illustrate how the adhesive properties of the contrast agent surface can be reversibly changed, from stealth to sticky, through the physical effects of ultrasound. This technique can be combined with any ligand-receptor pair to optimize targeted adhesion for ultrasonic molecular imaging.

[1]  S. Simon,et al.  Dynamic Regulation of LFA-1 Activation and Neutrophil Arrest on Intercellular Adhesion Molecule 1 (ICAM-1) in Shear Flow* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  Jonathan R. Lindner,et al.  Microbubbles in medical imaging: current applications and future directions , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[3]  P. Lai,et al.  Structure of a bidisperse polymer brush : Monte Carlo simulation and self-consistent field results , 1992 .

[4]  M. Longo,et al.  Dissolution behavior of lipid monolayer-coated, air-filled microbubbles: Effect of lipid hydrophobic chain length , 2002 .

[5]  David Needham,et al.  The Influence of Tiered Layers of Surface-Grafted Poly(ethylene glycol) on Receptor−Ligand-Mediated Adhesion between Phospholipid Monolayer-Stabilized Microbubbles and Coated Glass Beads , 2000 .

[6]  S Otto,et al.  Dissolution of multicomponent microbubbles in the bloodstream: 2. Experiment. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[7]  A. Klibanov,et al.  Targeted delivery of gas-filled microspheres, contrast agents for ultrasound imaging. , 1999, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[8]  Paul A. Dayton,et al.  Radiation-Force Assisted Targeting Facilitates Ultrasonic Molecular Imaging , 2004 .

[9]  K W Ferrara,et al.  Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis with US: imaging, Doppler, and contrast agents. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[10]  P. Dayton,et al.  Targeted imaging using ultrasound contrast agents , 2004, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[11]  Mark A. Borden,et al.  Oxygen Permeability of Fully Condensed Lipid Monolayers , 2004 .

[12]  Klaus Ley,et al.  Binding and detachment dynamics of microbubbles targeted to P-selectin under controlled shear flow. , 2004, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[13]  S. Kaul,et al.  Influence of microbubble surface charge on capillary transit and myocardial contrast enhancement. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  Giles Richardson,et al.  Mathematical modelling of magnetically targeted drug delivery , 2005 .

[15]  E. Unger,et al.  Targeted-Microbubble Binding Selectively to GPIIb IIIa Receptors of Platelet Thrombi , 2002, Investigative radiology.

[16]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Ultrasound-induced microbubble coalescence. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  J. Hossack,et al.  Acoustic radiation force enhances targeted delivery of ultrasound contrast microbubbles: in vitro verification , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[18]  E. Unger,et al.  Nitrogen-filled liposomes as a vascular US contrast agent: preliminary evaluation. , 1992, Radiology.

[19]  D. Hammer,et al.  The effect of polymer chain length and surface density on the adhesiveness of functionalized polymersomes. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[20]  K. Nightingale,et al.  A preliminary evaluation of the effects of primary and secondary radiation forces on acoustic contrast agents , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[21]  P. Dayton,et al.  Threshold of fragmentation for ultrasonic contrast agents. , 2001, Journal of biomedical optics.

[22]  J. Israelachvili,et al.  Impact of polymer tether length on multiple ligand-receptor bond formation. , 2001, Science.

[23]  E. Unger,et al.  Therapeutic applications of lipid-coated microbubbles. , 2004, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[24]  P. Dayton,et al.  Influence of lipid shell physicochemical properties on ultrasound-induced microbubble destruction , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[25]  S. Kaul,et al.  Assessment of Endogenous and Therapeutic Arteriogenesis by Contrast Ultrasound Molecular Imaging of Integrin Expression , 2005, Circulation.

[26]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Targeted imaging using ultrasound , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[27]  N. Dan,et al.  Effect of bimodal molecular weight distribution on the polymer brush , 1993 .

[28]  A. Klibanov,et al.  Ligand-carrying gas-filled microbubbles: ultrasound contrast agents for targeted molecular imaging. , 2005, Bioconjugate chemistry.