Dynamics of translation can determine the spatial organization of membrane-bound proteins and their mRNA

Significance Unlike their eukaryotic counterparts, bacterial cells are composed of a single compartment. This allows many rapidly diffusing macromolecules, such as proteins and mRNAs, to be evenly distributed in the cell. Important exceptions are proteins embedded in the cell membrane, which transport material and information across the membrane. Often these proteins attach to the membrane before their translation is complete, anchoring their mRNAs to the vicinity of the membrane. This coupling between translation and localization suggests that the dynamics of translation may shape the spatial organization. In this paper, we use a canonical model of nonequilibrium statistical physics to characterize this connection and show how tunable kinetic properties allow the cell to regulate the spatial organization of both mRNAs and proteins. Unlike most macromolecules that are homogeneously distributed in the bacterial cell, mRNAs that encode inner-membrane proteins can be concentrated near the inner membrane. Cotranslational insertion of the nascent peptide into the membrane brings the translating ribosome and the mRNA close to the membrane. This suggests that kinetic properties of translation can determine the spatial organization of these mRNAs and proteins, which can be modulated through posttranscriptional regulation. Here we use a simple stochastic model of translation to characterize the effect of mRNA properties on the dynamics and statistics of its spatial distribution. We show that a combination of the rate of translation initiation, the availability of secretory apparatuses, and the composition of the coding region determines the abundance of mRNAs near the membrane, as well as their residence time. We propose that the spatiotemporal dynamics of mRNAs can give rise to protein clusters on the membrane and determine their size distribution.

[1]  Erin E. Carlson,et al.  Progress and prospects for small-molecule probes of bacterial imaging. , 2016, Nature chemical biology.

[2]  Gene-Wei Li,et al.  The anti-Shine-Dalgarno sequence drives translational pausing and codon choice in bacteria , 2012, Nature.

[3]  Judith Frydman,et al.  Local slowdown of translation by nonoptimal codons promotes nascent-chain recognition by SRP in vivo , 2014, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[4]  E. Levine,et al.  Sub-cellular mRNA localization modulates the regulation of gene expression by small RNAs in bacteria , 2017, Physical biology.

[5]  E. Domany,et al.  Phase transitions in an exactly soluble one-dimensional exclusion process , 1993, cond-mat/9303038.

[6]  Ido Golding,et al.  RNA dynamics in live Escherichia coli cells. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Alistair N Boettiger,et al.  Spatial organization shapes the turnover of a bacterial transcriptome , 2016, eLife.

[8]  T. Chou,et al.  Clustered bottlenecks in mRNA translation and protein synthesis. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[9]  S. Karamanou,et al.  Protein export through the bacterial Sec pathway , 2016, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[10]  Thorsten Lang,et al.  Anatomy and Dynamics of a Supramolecular Membrane Protein Cluster , 2007, Science.

[11]  Thomas E. Gorochowski,et al.  Translational sensitivity of the Escherichia coli genome to fluctuating tRNA availability , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[12]  K. Gaus,et al.  Mechanisms of protein nanoscale clustering. , 2017, Current opinion in cell biology.

[13]  M. Sørensen,et al.  Absolute in vivo translation rates of individual codons in Escherichia coli. The two glutamic acid codons GAA and GAG are translated with a threefold difference in rate. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  P. Hrabák,et al.  Inter-particle gap distribution and spectral rigidity of the totally asymmetric simple exclusion process with open boundaries , 2010, 1011.0196.

[15]  J. Armitage,et al.  Positioning of bacterial chemoreceptors. , 2015, Trends in microbiology.

[16]  W. E. Moerner,et al.  Exploring bacterial cell biology with single-molecule tracking and super-resolution imaging , 2013, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[17]  É. Massé,et al.  New insights into small RNA-dependent translational regulation in prokaryotes. , 2013, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[18]  R. Losick,et al.  Protein subcellular localization in bacteria. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[19]  E. Wagner,et al.  Two antisense RNAs target the transcriptional regulator CsgD to inhibit curli synthesis , 2010, The EMBO journal.

[20]  P. Dennis,et al.  Differential rate of ribosomal protein synthesis in Escherichia coli B/r. , 1974, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  Ned S. Wingreen,et al.  Self-Organization of the Escherichia coli Chemotaxis Network Imaged with Super-Resolution Light Microscopy , 2009, PLoS biology.

[22]  E. Levine,et al.  Quantitative effect of target translation on small RNA efficacy reveals a novel mode of interaction , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[23]  S. Gottesman,et al.  Involvement of a novel transcriptional activator and small RNA in post‐transcriptional regulation of the glucose phosphoenolpyruvate phosphotransferase system , 2004, Molecular microbiology.

[24]  Lingchong You,et al.  Optimal tuning of bacterial sensing potential , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[25]  F. Rodríguez-Valera,et al.  Replicating phages in the epidermal mucosa of the eel (Anguilla anguilla) , 2015, Front. Microbiol..

[26]  P. Spencer,et al.  Silent substitutions predictably alter translation elongation rates and protein folding efficiencies. , 2012, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  A. Driessen,et al.  Protein Targeting to the Bacterial Cytoplasmic Membrane , 1999, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[28]  É. Massé,et al.  Dual-acting riboswitch control of translation initiation and mRNA decay , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  J. Abate,et al.  Multi‐precision Laplace transform inversion , 2004 .

[30]  Kai Simons,et al.  Membrane organization and lipid rafts. , 2011, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[31]  O. Amster-Choder,et al.  RNA localization in bacteria , 2014, RNA biology.

[32]  M. Goulian,et al.  Chromosome-Membrane Interactions in Bacteria. , 2015, Annual review of genetics.

[33]  T. Hwa,et al.  Traffic patrol in the transcription of ribosomal RNA , 2009, RNA biology.

[34]  B. Derrida,et al.  Exact solution of a 1d asymmetric exclusion model using a matrix formulation , 1993 .

[35]  P. Cluzel,et al.  Minimally invasive determination of mRNA concentration in single living bacteria , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[36]  T. Inada,et al.  Implication of membrane localization of target mRNA in the action of a small RNA: mechanism of post-transcriptional regulation of glucose transporter in Escherichia coli. , 2005, Genes & development.

[37]  M. Margaliot,et al.  Sensitivity of mRNA Translation , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[38]  S. Zimmerman,et al.  Hypothesis: the RNase-sensitive restraint to unfolding of spermidine nucleoids from Escherichia coli is composed of cotranslational insertion linkages. , 2002, Biophysical chemistry.

[39]  H. Bremer,et al.  Polypeptide-chain-elongation rate in Escherichia coli B/r as a function of growth rate. , 1976, The Biochemical journal.

[40]  Albert Siryaporn,et al.  Superresolution imaging of ribosomes and RNA polymerase in live Escherichia coli cells , 2012, Molecular microbiology.

[41]  E. Grayhack,et al.  Synonymous Codons: Choose Wisely for Expression. , 2017, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[42]  H. Salis,et al.  Translation rate is controlled by coupled trade-offs between site accessibility, selective RNA unfolding and sliding at upstream standby sites , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[43]  V. Norris,et al.  The membrane: transertion as an organizing principle in membrane heterogeneity , 2015, Front. Microbiol..

[44]  Maido Remm,et al.  Preferred and avoided codon pairs in three domains of life , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[45]  Kelvin H. Lee,et al.  Totally asymmetric exclusion process with extended objects: a model for protein synthesis. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[46]  Ned S Wingreen,et al.  Spatial organization of bacterial transcription and translation , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Gabriela R. Moura,et al.  Species-Specific Codon Context Rules Unveil Non-Neutrality Effects of Synonymous Mutations , 2011, PloS one.

[48]  J. Puglisi,et al.  Real-time observation of signal recognition particle binding to actively translating ribosomes , 2014, eLife.

[49]  J. Collins,et al.  DNA condensation in live E. coli provides evidence for transertion. , 2017, Molecular bioSystems.

[50]  Sigal Ben-Yehuda,et al.  Translation-Independent Localization of mRNA in E. coli , 2011, Science.

[51]  K. Keiler,et al.  RNA localization in bacteria. , 2011, Current opinion in microbiology.

[52]  D. Bray,et al.  Receptor clustering as a cellular mechanism to control sensitivity , 1998, Nature.

[53]  Paul J. Choi,et al.  Quantifying E. coli Proteome and Transcriptome with Single-Molecule Sensitivity in Single Cells , 2010, Science.

[54]  Jean-François Jacques,et al.  The small RNA RyhB activates the translation of shiA mRNA encoding a permease of shikimate, a compound involved in siderophore synthesis , 2007, Molecular microbiology.

[55]  Rafael Najmanovich,et al.  Large-scale analysis of conserved rare codon clusters suggests an involvement in co-translational molecular recognition events , 2012, Bioinform..

[56]  X. Xie,et al.  Probing Gene Expression in Live Cells, One Protein Molecule at a Time , 2006, Science.