User‐friendly and evidence‐based tool to evaluate probability of eradication of aquatic non‐indigenous species

Summary 1. The gap between practitioners and conservation or environmental management science is difficult to bridge. Managers sometimes use limited scientific information in their decisionmaking process, mainly because they have little time to review primary literature before making a decision. Making data readily available to managers is expected to improve the overall efficiency of management interventions. Here, we present an approach to develop userfriendly applications for evidence-based management and illustrate the concept by presenting a simple computer program designed to evaluate the probability of eradication of aquatic non-indigenous species. 2. We conducted a review of case studies that attempted to control aquatic non-indigenous species and used a statistical model to relate the outcome (eradication or non-eradication) to characteristics of the populations and interventions conducted. Based on a few key variables, the model returned accurate probabilities of eradication as evaluated with a receiver operating characteristic curve and jackknife and cross-validation procedures. 3. We packaged the statistical model in a user-friendly computer program that can be used by managers to (i) rapidly calculate the probability of success of a planned intervention with associated uncertainty, (ii) compare the success probabilities of different possible interventions and (iii) prioritize what information should be collected to increase the reliability of estimates. 4. Synthesis and applications. Our decision support tool is easy to implement, statistically flexible and could be used for any type of conservation or management intervention, given a sufficient number of case studies available in the literature. We recommend that scientists develop such tools whenever they conduct reviews of effectiveness of intervention. This is likely to result in greater use of data by practitioners, increased reliability of cost–benefit analyses and an overall increase in efficiency in conservation and environmental management.

[1]  Monique Borgerhoff Mulder,et al.  Testing Hypotheses for the Success of Different Conservation Strategies , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[2]  G. Hilton,et al.  Costing eradications of alien mammals from islands , 2006 .

[3]  A. Pullin,et al.  Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[4]  D. Oro,et al.  A systematic review of the effects of recreational activities on nesting birds of prey , 2010 .

[5]  Robert P Freckleton,et al.  Making predictive ecology more relevant to policy makers and practitioners , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  W. Sutherland,et al.  The need for evidence-based conservation. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  The nature and role of experiential knowledge for environmental conservation , 2006, Environmental Conservation.

[8]  Peter W J Baxter,et al.  Using Conservation Evidence to Guide Management , 2011, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[9]  Daniel B. Mark,et al.  TUTORIAL IN BIOSTATISTICS MULTIVARIABLE PROGNOSTIC MODELS: ISSUES IN DEVELOPING MODELS, EVALUATING ASSUMPTIONS AND ADEQUACY, AND MEASURING AND REDUCING ERRORS , 1996 .

[10]  David N Lerner,et al.  Bringing diverse knowledge sources together--a meta-model for supporting integrated catchment management. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[11]  A. Pullin,et al.  Do conservation managers use scientific evidence to support their decision-making? , 2004 .

[12]  Andrew S. Pullin,et al.  Applying evidence-based practice in conservation management: Lessons from the first systematic review and dissemination projects , 2005 .

[13]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Can methods applied in medicine be used to summarize and disseminate conservation research? , 2004, Environmental Conservation.

[14]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  We can eliminate invasions or live with them. Successful management projects , 2008, Biological Invasions.

[15]  B. Campbell,et al.  Adaptive management: where are we now? , 2012, Environmental Conservation.

[16]  Andrew S Pullin,et al.  Effectiveness of Predator Removal for Enhancing Bird Populations , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[17]  B. Schaffelke,et al.  A review of rapid response options for the control of ABWMAC listed introduced species and related taxa in Australian waters. Centre for Research on Introduced Marine Pests , 2001 .

[18]  Jan Pergl,et al.  When are eradication campaigns successful? A test of common assumptions , 2012, Biological Invasions.

[19]  Foster J. Provost,et al.  Confidence Bands for Roc Curves , 2004, ROCAI.

[20]  Susan L. Williams,et al.  The Invasive Species Challenge in Estuarine and Coastal Environments: Marrying Management and Science , 2008 .

[21]  Rebecca K. Smith,et al.  Is nest predator exclusion an effective strategy for enhancing bird populations , 2011 .

[22]  A. Pullin,et al.  The relative importance of grazing stock type and grazing intensity for conservation of mesotrophic ‘old meadow’ pasture , 2008 .

[23]  R. W. Carter,et al.  Conservation in the dark? The information used to support management decisions , 2010 .

[24]  Helen R. Bayliss,et al.  Effectiveness of engineered in-stream structure mitigation measures to increase salmonid abundance: a systematic review. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[25]  C. Kolar,et al.  Ecological Predictions and Risk Assessment for Alien Fishes in North America , 2002, Science.

[26]  L. Anderson.  California’s Reaction to Caulerpa taxifolia: A Model for Invasive Species Rapid Response* , 2005, Biological Invasions.

[27]  Andrew S. Pullin,et al.  Effectiveness in Conservation Practice: Pointers from Medicine and Public Health , 2001 .

[28]  D. Simberloff,et al.  BIOTIC INVASIONS: CAUSES, EPIDEMIOLOGY, GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES, AND CONTROL , 2000 .

[29]  M. Boyce.  Population Viability Analysis , 1992 .

[30]  Andrew S. Pullin,et al.  Assessing Conservation Management's Evidence Base: a Survey of Management‐Plan Compilers in the United Kingdom and Australia , 2005 .

[31]  Adrian C. Newton,et al.  Bayesian Belief Networks as a tool for evidence-based conservation management , 2007 .

[32]  P. J. Daugherty,et al.  What Makes Community Forest Management Successful: A Meta-Study From Community Forests Throughout the World , 2006 .

[33]  Daniel Sol,et al.  TEASIng apart alien species risk assessments: a framework for best practices. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[34]  B. Schaffelke,et al.  A review of rapid response options for the control of ABWMAC listed introduced marine pest species and related taxa in Australian waters , 2001 .

[35]  W. Thuiller,et al.  Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[36]  A. Pullin,et al.  Are current management recommendations for saproxylic invertebrates effective? A systematic review , 2007, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[37]  R. Ambrose,et al.  Differentiating successful and failed molluscan invaders in estuarine ecosystems , 2007 .

[38]  Tatsuya Amano,et al.  Conservation practice could benefit from routine testing and publication of management outcomes , 2013 .

[39]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[40]  Jeffrey M. Dambacher,et al.  Qualitative modelling of invasive species eradication on subantarctic Macquarie Island , 2011 .

[41]  Andrew S. Pullin,et al.  Are hedgerows effective corridors between fragments of woodland habitat? An evidence-based approach , 2007, Landscape Ecology.