A COMPUTER-AIDED SYSTEM FOR MASS DETECTION AND CLASSIFICATION IN DIGITIZED MAMMOGRAMS

This paper presents a computer-assisted diagnostic system for mass detection and classification, which performs mass detection on regions of interest followed by the benign-malignant classification on detected masses. In order for mass detection to be effective, a sequence of preprocessing steps are designed to enhance the intensity of a region of interest, remove the noise effects and locate suspicious masses using five texture features generated from the spatial gray level difference matrix (SGLDM) and fractal dimension. Finally, a probabilistic neural network (PNN) coupled with entropic thresholding techniques is developed for mass extraction. Since the shapes of masses are crucial in classification between benignancy and malignancy, four shape features are further generated and joined with the five features previously used in mass detection to be implemented in another PNN for mass classification. To evaluate our designed system a data set collected in the Taichung Veteran General Hospital, Taiwan, R.O.C. was used for performance evaluation. The results are encouraging and have shown promise of our system.

[1]  N. Petrick,et al.  Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses and normal tissue: linear discriminant analysis in texture feature space. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Pau-Choo Chung,et al.  Off-line mammography screening system embedded with hierarchically-coarse-to-fine techniques for the detection and segmentation of clustered microcalcifications , 2000 .

[3]  M L Giger,et al.  Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: analysis of bilateral subtraction images. , 1991, Medical physics.

[4]  Evangelos Dermatas,et al.  Fast detection of masses in computer-aided mammography , 2000, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[5]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  An adaptive density-weighted contrast enhancement filter for mammographic breast mass detection , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[6]  Benoit B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[7]  D. Kopans.  Standardized mammography reporting. , 1992, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[8]  S. Lai,et al.  On techniques for detecting circumscribed masses in mammograms. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[9]  R. Gordon,et al.  Enhancement of Mammographic Features by Optimal Adaptive Neighborhood Image Processing , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  M. Sameti,et al.  Texture feature extraction for tumor detection in mammographic images , 1997, 1997 IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computers and Signal Processing, PACRIM. 10 Years Networking the Pacific Rim, 1987-1997.

[11]  K Doi,et al.  Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. I. Automated detection of microcalcifications in mammography. , 1987, Medical physics.

[12]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Mammographic feature analysis. , 1993, Seminars in roentgenology.

[13]  J. M. Pruneda,et al.  Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. , 1994, Radiology.

[14]  P. P. Deimel,et al.  Full-width-half-maximum and confinement of optical modes in multiple-quantum-well laser structures , 1993 .

[15]  N. Petrick,et al.  Classification of mass and normal breast tissue on digital mammograms: multiresolution texture analysis. , 1995, Medical physics.

[16]  B. Aldrich,et al.  Application of spatial grey level dependence methods to digitized mammograms , 1994, Proceedings of the IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation.

[17]  Sameer Singh,et al.  Detection of masses in mammograms using texture features , 2000, Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000.

[18]  D Brzakovic,et al.  An approach to automated detection of tumors in mammograms. , 1990, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[19]  C J Vyborny,et al.  Can computers help radiologists read mammograms? , 1994, Radiology.