Application of machine learning for filtered density function closure in MILD combustion

Abstract A machine learning algorithm, the deep neural network (DNN) 1 , is trained using a comprehensive direct numerical simulation (DNS) dataset to predict joint filtered density functions (FDFs) of mixture fraction and reaction progress variable in Moderate or Intense Low-oxygen Dilution (MILD) combustion. The important features of the DNS cases include mixture fraction variations, turbulent mixing lengths, exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) dilution levels, etc., posing a great challenge for data-driven modelling. The DNN architecture is built and optimised with extreme care to achieve high robustness and accuracy, resorting to dimensionality reduction techniques such as principal component analysis (PCA) to identify and remove the outliers in the training data. To better interpret the predictive ability of the DNN, two analytical joint FDF models respectively using two independent β and copula distributions, are also employed for a detailed comparison with the DNS data. The FDFs in MILD combustion behave differently compared to those in conventional flames because the reaction zones are more distributed. They generally exhibit non-regular (neither Gaussian nor bi-modal) distributions and strong cross correlations, which cannot be captured adequately by the analytical models. However, the DNN is well suited for this physico-chemically complex problem and its predictions are in excellent agreement with the DNS data for a broad range of mixture conditions and filter sizes. Furthermore, a priori assessment is conducted for filtered reaction rate closure. It is found that the DNN model significantly outperforms the analytical models for all cases showing very good predictions for the filtered reaction rate for a range of filter sizes. The DNN prediction improves as the filter size becomes larger than the characteristic reaction zone thickness while the analytical models works relatively better for smaller filter sizes. This is a clear advantage for the DNN to be used in practical LES applications.

[1]  Bassam B. Dally,et al.  Structure of turbulent non-premixed jet flames in a diluted hot coflow , 2002 .

[2]  M. Ihme,et al.  Tabulated chemistry approach for diluted combustion regimes with internal recirculation and heat losses , 2014 .

[3]  T. Poinsot,et al.  Training convolutional neural networks to estimate turbulent sub-grid scale reaction rates , 2018, Combustion and Flame.

[4]  Norbert Peters,et al.  Laseroptical investigation of highly preheated combustion with strong exhaust gas recirculation , 1998 .

[5]  Stephen B. Pope,et al.  Computations of turbulent combustion: Progress and challenges , 1991 .

[6]  Denis Veynante,et al.  Turbulent combustion modeling , 2002, VKI Lecture Series.

[7]  N. Swaminathan,et al.  DNS of EGR-type turbulent flame in MILD condition , 2013 .

[8]  R. Plackett A Class of Bivariate Distributions , 1965 .

[9]  Mário Costa,et al.  Operational, Combustion, and Emission Characteristics of a Small-Scale Combustor , 2011 .

[10]  P. Moin,et al.  Progress-variable approach for large-eddy simulation of non-premixed turbulent combustion , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  Giancarlo Sorrentino,et al.  The Effect of Diluent on the Sustainability of MILD Combustion in a Cyclonic Burner , 2016 .

[12]  Zhi X. Chen,et al.  A priori investigation of subgrid correlation of mixture fraction and progress variable in partially premixed flames , 2018 .

[13]  R. Barlow,et al.  Experimental study of scalar filtered mass density function in turbulent partially premixed flames , 2007 .

[14]  Heinz Pitsch,et al.  Prediction of extinction and reignition in nonpremixed turbulent flames using a flamelet/progress variable model: 1. A priori study and presumed PDF closure , 2008 .

[15]  J. Wunning,et al.  Flameless oxidation to reduce thermal no-formation , 1997 .

[16]  N. Swaminathan Physical Insights on MILD Combustion From DNS , 2019, Front. Mech. Eng..

[17]  Y. Minamoto,et al.  MILD Combustion , 2021, Advanced Turbulent Combustion Physics and Applications.

[18]  R. Gordon,et al.  Simulations of Autoignition and Laminar Premixed Flames in Methane/Air Mixtures Diluted with Hot Products , 2014 .

[19]  D. Bradley,et al.  A mixedness-reactedness flamelet model for turbulent diffusion flames , 1991 .

[20]  Norbert Peters,et al.  Characteristics of the reaction zone in a combustor operating at mild combustion , 2001 .

[21]  D. Roekaerts,et al.  Ignition kernel formation and lift-off behaviour of jet-in-hot-coflow flames , 2010 .

[22]  M. U. Goktolga,et al.  Numerical investigation of mild combustion in a cyclonic burner , 2017 .

[23]  Chenning Tong,et al.  Measurements of conserved scalar filtered density function in a turbulent jet , 2001 .

[24]  S. Pope PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows , 1985 .

[25]  Numerical Study of a Cyclonic Combustor under Moderate or Intense Low-Oxygen Dilution Conditions Using Non-adiabatic Tabulated Chemistry , 2018, Energy & Fuels.

[26]  Petros Koumoutsakos,et al.  Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanics , 2019, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics.

[27]  Mia Hubert,et al.  Computational Statistics and Data Analysis Robust Pca for Skewed Data and Its Outlier Map , 2022 .

[28]  Zhi X. Chen,et al.  Simulation of turbulent lifted methane jet flames: effects of air-dilution and transient flame propagation , 2015 .

[29]  Van Oijen Direct numerical simulation of autoigniting mixing layers in MILD combustion , 2013 .

[30]  S. Pope Small scales, many species and the manifold challenges of turbulent combustion , 2013 .

[31]  D. Roekaerts,et al.  Flameless combustion and its potential towards gas turbines , 2018, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science.

[32]  Trupti Kathrotia,et al.  Experimental and numerical study of chemiluminescent species in low-pressure flames , 2012 .

[33]  Nedunchezhian Swaminathan,et al.  Scalar gradient behaviour in MILD combustion , 2014 .

[34]  Ray W. Grout,et al.  Deep learning for presumed probability density function models , 2019, Combustion and Flame.

[35]  Alessandro Saponaro,et al.  Zero-dimensional analysis of diluted oxidation of methane in rich conditions , 2000 .

[36]  Nasser Darabiha,et al.  Modelling non-adiabatic partially premixed flames using flame-prolongation of ILDM , 2003 .

[37]  Nedunchezhian Swaminathan,et al.  Reaction Zones and Their Structure in MILD Combustion , 2014 .

[38]  R. Barlow,et al.  Investigation of subgrid-scale mixing of mixture fraction and temperature in turbulent partially premixed flames , 2009 .

[39]  Giancarlo Sorrentino,et al.  MILD combustion in diffusion-controlled regimes of Hot Diluted Fuel , 2012 .

[40]  Dominik Endres,et al.  A new metric for probability distributions , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[41]  W. K. Bushe,et al.  Large eddy simulation of a turbulent reacting jet with conditional source-term estimation , 2001 .

[42]  N. Swaminathan,et al.  Modelling of turbulent lifted jet flames using flamelets: a priori assessment and a posteriori validation , 2014 .

[43]  N. Swaminathan,et al.  Role of radicals on MILD combustion inception , 2019, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute.

[44]  N. Swaminathan,et al.  A Presumed Joint pdf Model for Turbulent Combustion with Varying Equivalence Ratio , 2012 .

[45]  A. Cavaliere,et al.  The role of dilution level and canonical configuration in the modeling of MILD combustion systems with internal recirculation , 2020 .

[46]  Vincent Giovangigli,et al.  Formulation of the premixed and nonpremixed test problems , 1991 .

[47]  ten Jhm Jan Thije Boonkkamp,et al.  State-of-the-art in premixed combustion modeling using flamelet generated manifolds , 2016 .

[48]  Tiziano Faravelli,et al.  Analysis of process parameters for steady operations in methane mild combustion technology , 2004 .

[49]  A. Klimenko,et al.  Conditional moment closure for turbulent combustion , 1999 .

[50]  W. Jones,et al.  Pdf modeling of finite-rate chemistry effects in turbulent nonpremixed jet flames , 1998 .

[51]  N. Swaminathan,et al.  Autoignition and flame propagation in non-premixed MILD combustion , 2019, Combustion and Flame.

[52]  P. Sabia,et al.  Mild Combustion in Homogeneous Charge Diffusion Ignition (HCDI) regime , 2007 .

[53]  R. Barlow,et al.  On defining progress variable for Raman/Rayleigh experiments in partially-premixed methane flames , 2017 .

[54]  Feng Gao,et al.  A large‐eddy simulation scheme for turbulent reacting flows , 1993 .

[55]  A. Kempf,et al.  A simple model for the filtered density function for passive scalar combustion LES , 2009 .

[56]  Laminar Flamelets in Turbulent Combustion Modeling , 2016 .

[57]  N. Swaminathan,et al.  Morphological and statistical features of reaction zones in MILD and premixed combustion , 2014 .

[58]  N. Swaminathan,et al.  DNS of MILD combustion with mixture fraction variations , 2018 .