Preferences, Utility and Prescriptive Decision Control in Complex Systems

The evaluation of the preferences based utility function is a goal of the human cantered control (management) design.The achievement of this goal depends on the determination and on the presentation of the requirements, characteristics and preferences of the human behaviour in the appropriate environment (management, control or administration of complex processes). The decision making theory, the utility and the probability theory are a possible approach under consideration. This paper presents an approach to evaluation of human’s preferences and their utilization in complex problems.The stochastic approximation is a possible resolution to the problem under consideration. The stochastic evaluation bases on mathematically formulated axiomatic principles and stochastic procedures. The uncertainty of the human preferences is eliminated as typically for the stochastic programming. The evaluation is preferences-oriented machine learning with restriction of the “certainty effect and probability distortion” of the utility assessment. The mathematical formulations presented here serve as basis of tools development. The utility and value evaluation leads to the development of preferences-based decision support in machine learning environments and iterative control design in complex problems.

[1]  H. Brachinger,et al.  Decision analysis , 1997 .

[2]  Heinrich Kuhn,et al.  Designing decision support systems for value-based management: A survey and an architecture , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[3]  Jean-Yves Jaffray,et al.  Certainty effect versus probability distortion: An experimental analysis of decision making under risk. , 1988 .

[4]  Jonathan Barzilai,et al.  On the foundations of measurement , 2001, 2001 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. e-Systems and e-Man for Cybernetics in Cyberspace (Cat.No.01CH37236).

[5]  Dr.Yuri Pavlov Specific Growth Rate And Sliding Mode Stabilization Of Fed-Batch Processes , 1965 .

[6]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[7]  R. M. Adelson,et al.  Utility Theory for Decision Making , 1971 .

[8]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Optimal Predictions in Everyday Cognition , 2006, Psychological science.

[9]  Yuri Pavlov,et al.  Decision Control, Management, and Support in Adaptive and Complex Systems: Quantitative Models , 2013 .

[10]  Y. Pavlov Equivalent Forms of Wang-Yerusalimsky Kinetic Model and Optimal Growth Rate Control of Fed-batch Cultivation Processes , 2008 .

[11]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[12]  Johann Pfanzagl,et al.  Theory of measurement , 1970 .

[13]  Paul Collopy,et al.  Value-Driven Design , 2011 .

[14]  M. Allais Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque : critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole americaine , 1953 .

[15]  R. Neeleman,et al.  Biomass performance : monitoring and control in bio-pharmaceutical production , 2002 .

[16]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[17]  D. Schmeidler Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity , 1989 .

[18]  Alexander J. Smola,et al.  Online learning with kernels , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[19]  Jaap Van Brakel,et al.  Foundations of measurement , 1983 .

[20]  Nancy Cartwright,et al.  A theory of measurement. , 2016 .