Using Signal-to-Noise Ratio to Explore The Cognitive Cost of The Detection Response Task

The Detection Response Task (DRT) is a standardized measure of cognitive load requiring manual responses to intermittent stimuli. Given its simplicity, it is hypothesized that its completion will not interfere with the primary task. However, recent studies challenge this assumption showing a definite cost of DRT performance. In this study we adopt signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), a measure commonly used in communication engineering: 1) to explore the cognitive cost of DRT 2) to compare the sensitivity of DRT performance and pupil size in measuring cognitive load. SNR was calculated using the data from a study wherein DRT performance and pupil size were recorded while participants completed increasingly difficult mental tasks. We conclude that DRT completion interfered with the overall cognitive task demand and showed pupil size’s greater sensitivity to changes in cognitive load. Though exploratory, our study advances using SNR as a powerful tool for data integration in HF/E research.

[1]  R. Jagacinski,et al.  Spatio-Temporal Flexibility of Attention Inferred from Drivers’ Steering Movements , 2021, Journal of motor behavior.

[2]  Francesco Biondi,et al.  Response time and eye tracking datasets for activities demanding varying cognitive load , 2020, Data in brief.

[3]  Balakumar Balasingam,et al.  On the Cost of Detection Response Task Performance on Cognitive Load , 2020, Hum. Factors.

[4]  Junmin Wang,et al.  Drivers’ Spatio-Temporal Attentional Distributions Are Influenced by Vehicle Dynamics and Displayed Point of View , 2020, Hum. Factors.

[5]  Andrew Heathcote,et al.  Using response time modeling to understand the sources of dual-task interference in a dynamic environment. , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Andrew Heathcote,et al.  Cognitive workload measurement and modeling under divided attention. , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Brennan R. Payne,et al.  A Review of Psychophysiological Measures to Assess Cognitive States in Real-World Driving , 2019, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[8]  Krzysztof Krejtz,et al.  Eye tracking cognitive load using pupil diameter and microsaccades with fixed gaze , 2018, PloS one.

[9]  M. Kret,et al.  Preprocessing pupil size data: Guidelines and code , 2018, Behavior research methods.

[10]  Jaka Sodnik,et al.  An analysis of the suitability of a low-cost eye tracker for assessing the cognitive load of drivers. , 2018, Applied ergonomics.

[11]  Richard J. Jagacinski,et al.  Measuring Memory and Attention to Preview in Motion , 2017, Hum. Factors.

[12]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Extending the Detection Response Task to Simultaneously Measure Cognitive and Visual Task Demands , 2016 .

[13]  Emery N. Brown,et al.  Measuring the signal-to-noise ratio of a neuron , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Yves Rosseel,et al.  On the Definition of Signal-To-Noise Ratio and Contrast-To-Noise Ratio for fMRI Data , 2013, PloS one.

[15]  Wan-Young Chung,et al.  A Smartphone-Based Driver Safety Monitoring System Using Data Fusion , 2012, Sensors.

[16]  John D. Lee,et al.  Driver Distraction : Theory, Effects, and Mitigation , 2008 .

[17]  Frank Drews,et al.  Profiles in Driver Distraction: Effects of Cell Phone Conversations on Younger and Older Drivers , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[18]  E. Viding,et al.  Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  R. Gilkey,et al.  Sound localization in noise: the effect of signal-to-noise ratio. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Gary Burnett,et al.  Defining Driver Distraction , 2005 .

[21]  Steven W. Smith,et al.  The Scientist and Engineer's Guide to Digital Signal Processing , 1997 .

[22]  Drew H. Abney,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Influence of Musical Groove on Postural Sway , 2015 .